Dutch Bros Inc.
Dutch Bros Inc. BROS Peers
See (BROS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BROS | $70.19 | +0.47% | 11.54B | 206.43 | $0.34 | N/A |
| MCD | $308.65 | -1.05% | 220.70B | 27.24 | $11.33 | +2.22% |
| SBUX | $86.88 | +1.41% | 98.73B | 31.59 | $2.75 | +2.72% |
| CMG | $50.66 | -0.20% | 68.26B | 44.83 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $145.74 | -0.72% | 40.51B | 29.03 | $5.02 | +1.87% |
| DRI | $205.00 | +0.56% | 23.99B | 23.11 | $8.87 | +2.71% |
| QSR | $67.80 | -1.44% | 22.21B | 21.32 | $3.18 | +3.47% |
| YUMC | $46.09 | -0.04% | 17.21B | 19.28 | $2.39 | +1.56% |
| DPZ | $484.40 | +0.47% | 16.59B | 27.76 | $17.45 | +1.28% |
| TXRH | $190.51 | +0.29% | 12.66B | 29.45 | $6.47 | +1.31% |
Stock Comparison
BROS vs MCD Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 220.70B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while MCD trades at $308.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs SBUX Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 98.73B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while SBUX trades at $86.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CMG Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 68.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while CMG trades at $50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs YUM Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while YUM trades at $145.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs DRI Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while DRI trades at $205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs QSR Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while QSR trades at $67.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs YUMC Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 17.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while YUMC trades at $46.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs DPZ Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 16.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while DPZ trades at $484.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs TXRH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 12.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while TXRH trades at $190.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CAVA Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 11.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while CAVA trades at $99.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 90.65. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs WING Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 7.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while WING trades at $286.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs EAT Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while EAT trades at $151.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs SHAK Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while SHAK trades at $99.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 431.00. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CAKE Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while CAKE trades at $53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs WEN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while WEN trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs SG Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while SG trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -19.97. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs ARCO Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while ARCO trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs HDL Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while HDL trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 59.05. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs PZZA Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while PZZA trades at $41.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CBRL Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while CBRL trades at $54.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 33.87. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CNNE Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while CNNE trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FWRG Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while FWRG trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 99.88. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BJRI Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 947.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while BJRI trades at $42.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 44.63. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs TWNPV Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.88M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs KRUS Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 811.06M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while KRUS trades at $67.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -72.95. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs PTLO Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 788.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while PTLO trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 736.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while BH trades at $238.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -88.94. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BH-A Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 735.52M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while BH-A trades at $1,171.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -86.92. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BLMN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 717.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while BLMN trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs RUTH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.54M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CHUY Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.87M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs TAST Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs JACK Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 491.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while JACK trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -13.94. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs NATH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 417.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while NATH trades at $102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NATH's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs RICK Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 398.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while RICK trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 78.93. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs DIN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 385.33M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while DIN trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs TWNP Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 353.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while TWNP trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs PBPB Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 311.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while PBPB trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs VENU Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 293.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while VENU trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs LOCO Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 283.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while LOCO trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs DENN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 227.55M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while DENN trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FRGI Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BBQ Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs GENK Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 165.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while GENK trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is 38.77. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GENK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs STKS Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 139.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while STKS trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs THCHW Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.58M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs THCH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 88.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while THCH trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THCH's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs MB Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 64.09M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while MB trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FATBW Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 54.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while FATBW trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs GRIL Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRIL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FATAV Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs RRGB Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 53.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while RRGB trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FAT Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 50.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while FAT trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FATBP Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 49.48M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while FATBP trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FATBB Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 48.38M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while FATBB trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BDL Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 43.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while BDL trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs NDLS Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 40.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while NDLS trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs RAVE Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 39.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while RAVE trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs ARKR Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 38.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while ARKR trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs YOSH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 22.92M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while YOSH trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs MYT Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs GTIM Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 19.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while GTIM trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs PC Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 15.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while PC trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs REBN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 13.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while REBN trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REBN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CHSN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 12.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while CHSN trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BTBDW Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 8.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while BTBDW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BTBD Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 6.40M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while BTBD trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BTB Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FATBV Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BFI Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs PNST Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while PNST trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BFIIW Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242318.00. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs ONDR Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.54B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81.00. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.19, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 206.43, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.