Dutch Bros Inc.
Dutch Bros Inc. BROS Peers
See (BROS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BROS | $70.80 | -1.34% | 11.6B | 181.54 | $0.39 | N/A |
| MCD | $312.38 | -0.10% | 223.4B | 27.57 | $11.33 | +2.23% |
| SBUX | $86.60 | +1.66% | 98.4B | 31.49 | $2.75 | +2.77% |
| CMG | $50.06 | +0.44% | 67.4B | 44.30 | $1.13 | N/A |
| YUM | $143.99 | -0.44% | 40B | 28.68 | $5.02 | +1.91% |
| DRI | $217.22 | +0.17% | 25.4B | 24.49 | $8.87 | +2.58% |
| QSR | $71.71 | -0.40% | 23.5B | 24.31 | $2.95 | +3.28% |
| YUMC | $43.39 | -1.33% | 16.2B | 18.15 | $2.39 | +1.84% |
| DPZ | $464.41 | -0.34% | 15.9B | 26.64 | $17.43 | +1.35% |
| TXRH | $196.00 | +0.68% | 13B | 30.25 | $6.48 | +1.63% |
Stock Comparison
BROS vs MCD Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 223.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while MCD trades at $312.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCD's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs SBUX Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while SBUX trades at $86.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CMG Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while CMG trades at $50.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 44.30. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs YUM Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while YUM trades at $143.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs DRI Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while DRI trades at $217.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs QSR Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while QSR trades at $71.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs YUMC Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while YUMC trades at $43.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs DPZ Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while DPZ trades at $464.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs TXRH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while TXRH trades at $196.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs WING Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while WING trades at $346.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 58.22. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CAVA Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while CAVA trades at $81.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 67.57. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs EAT Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while EAT trades at $173.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EAT's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs SHAK Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while SHAK trades at $127.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 439.48. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CAKE Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while CAKE trades at $56.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs WEN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while WEN trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEN's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs SG Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while SG trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -18.32. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs ARCO Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while ARCO trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs PZZA Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while PZZA trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs HDL Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while HDL trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CBRL Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while CBRL trades at $56.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CNNE Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while CNNE trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BJRI Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 993M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while BJRI trades at $44.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 46.77. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FWRG Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while FWRG trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 90.29. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs KRUS Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 877.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while KRUS trades at $72.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -78.91. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs TWNPV Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BH-A Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 789.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while BH-A trades at $1,250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 782.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while BH trades at $254.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs PTLO Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 765.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while PTLO trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs RUTH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CHUY Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BLMN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 642.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while BLMN trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs TAST Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs NATH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 430.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while NATH trades at $105.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NATH's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs DIN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 368.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while DIN trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs JACK Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 365.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while JACK trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs RICK Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 354.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while RICK trades at $40.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 46.85. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs VENU Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 338.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while VENU trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs LOCO Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while LOCO trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs PBPB Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while PBPB trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FRGI Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs TWNP Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 215M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while TWNP trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs DENN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while DENN trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BBQ Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs STKS Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 112.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while STKS trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs RRGB Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while RRGB trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs THCHW Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs THCH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while THCH trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THCH's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs MB Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while MB trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas MB's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs GRIL Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FATAV Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FATAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BDL Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while BDL trades at $28.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FATBP Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while FATBP trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FAT Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while FAT trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FATBW Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while FATBW trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FATBB Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while FATBB trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs RAVE Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while RAVE trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs ARKR Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while ARKR trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs NDLS Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while NDLS trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs MYT Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs YOSH Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while YOSH trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs GENK Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while GENK trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -100.37. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs GTIM Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while GTIM trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs PC Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while PC trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -18.15. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs REBN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while REBN trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REBN's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs CHSN Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while CHSN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BTBD Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while BTBD trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BTBDW Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while BTBDW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BTB Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs FATBV Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs PNST Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while PNST trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BFI Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs BFIIW Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs ONDR Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.
BROS vs LUB Comparison
BROS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BROS stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BROS is priced at $70.80, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BROS currently has a P/E ratio of 181.54, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BROS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LUB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BROS is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BROS.