Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BOOT
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BOOT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOOT | $135.16 | -5.82% | 4.1B | 18.93 | $7.14 | N/A |
| TJX | $161.29 | -0.46% | 179.5B | 33.12 | $4.87 | +1.05% |
| ROST | $219.98 | +0.01% | 71.2B | 33.33 | $6.60 | +0.75% |
| BURL | $328.73 | -0.63% | 20.6B | 34.60 | $9.50 | N/A |
| LULU | $155.72 | -1.95% | 18.3B | 11.73 | $13.27 | N/A |
| ONON | $33.03 | -5.00% | 10.9B | 43.46 | $0.76 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $24.61 | -0.61% | 9.2B | 11.55 | $2.13 | +2.68% |
| URBN | $64.57 | +1.33% | 5.8B | 12.76 | $5.06 | N/A |
| ANF | $92.21 | -2.17% | 4.2B | 8.82 | $10.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BOOT vs TJX Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 179.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while TJX trades at $161.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check TJX's competition here
BOOT vs ROST Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while ROST trades at $219.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check ROST's competition here
BOOT vs BURL Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while BURL trades at $328.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 34.60. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check BURL's competition here
BOOT vs LULU Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while LULU trades at $155.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check LULU's competition here
BOOT vs ONON Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while ONON trades at $33.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 43.46. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check ONON's competition here
BOOT vs GPS Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check GPS's competition here
BOOT vs GAP Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while GAP trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check GAP's competition here
BOOT vs URBN Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while URBN trades at $64.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check URBN's competition here
BOOT vs ANF Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while ANF trades at $92.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check ANF's competition here
BOOT vs VSCO Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while VSCO trades at $46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check VSCO's competition here
BOOT vs AEO Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while AEO trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check AEO's competition here
BOOT vs BKE Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while BKE trades at $50.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check BKE's competition here
BOOT vs FL Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check FL's competition here
BOOT vs CRI Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while CRI trades at $35.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CRI's competition here
BOOT vs HIBB Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check HIBB's competition here
BOOT vs CHS Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CHS's competition here
BOOT vs GES Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check GES's competition here
BOOT vs SFIX Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 464.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while SFIX trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -17.89. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check SFIX's competition here
BOOT vs SCVL Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while SCVL trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check SCVL's competition here
BOOT vs ZUMZ Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 366.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while ZUMZ trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check ZUMZ's competition here
BOOT vs CTRN Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 361.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while CTRN trades at $43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 68.84. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CTRN's competition here
BOOT vs GCO Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while GCO trades at $28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check GCO's competition here
BOOT vs DBI Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 293.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while DBI trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -34.82. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check DBI's competition here
BOOT vs CURV Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 180.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while CURV trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CURV's competition here
BOOT vs JILL Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while JILL trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check JILL's competition here
BOOT vs TLYS Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while TLYS trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check TLYS's competition here
BOOT vs DLTH Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while DLTH trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check DLTH's competition here
BOOT vs PLCE Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 73.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while PLCE trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check PLCE's competition here
BOOT vs CATO Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while CATO trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CATO's competition here
BOOT vs DXLG Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while DXLG trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check DXLG's competition here
BOOT vs LVLU Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while LVLU trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check LVLU's competition here
BOOT vs DBGIW Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check DBGIW's competition here
BOOT vs RENT Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while RENT trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check RENT's competition here
BOOT vs BIRD Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while BIRD trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check BIRD's competition here
BOOT vs DBGI Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while DBGI trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check DBGI's competition here
BOOT vs EXPR Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check EXPR's competition here
BOOT vs JEM Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while JEM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check JEM's competition here
BOOT vs LDG Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check LDG's competition here
BOOT vs CLE Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CLE's competition here
BOOT vs COX Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check COX's competition here
BOOT vs TSA Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check TSA's competition here
BOOT vs FINL Comparison April 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $135.16, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check FINL's competition here