Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHFAP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BHFAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHFAP | $15.79 | -0.69% | 2.6B | 1.25 | $12.61 | N/A |
| MFC | $34.11 | +2.10% | 57.2B | 15.09 | $2.26 | +3.89% |
| AFL | $109.11 | +0.37% | 56.3B | 16.00 | $6.82 | +2.15% |
| MET-PE | $23.06 | -0.37% | 48.6B | 2.95 | $7.81 | +3.32% |
| MET | $69.18 | +1.78% | 45.6B | 14.69 | $4.71 | +3.32% |
| MET-PA | $21.58 | +0.23% | 41.9B | 2.76 | $7.81 | +3.32% |
| PUK | $29.40 | +2.65% | 38.4B | 11.44 | $2.57 | +1.64% |
| PRU | $93.22 | +1.33% | 32.4B | 9.33 | $9.99 | +5.90% |
| MET-PF | $18.90 | -0.01% | 12.3B | 2.42 | $7.81 | +3.32% |
| UNM | $72.86 | +0.96% | 12.2B | 17.06 | $4.27 | +2.49% |
Stock Comparison
BHFAP vs MFC Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while MFC trades at $34.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check MFC's competition here
BHFAP vs AFL Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while AFL trades at $109.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check AFL's competition here
BHFAP vs MET-PE Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while MET-PE trades at $23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check MET-PE's competition here
BHFAP vs MET Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while MET trades at $69.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check MET's competition here
BHFAP vs MET-PA Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while MET-PA trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check MET-PA's competition here
BHFAP vs PUK Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while PUK trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check PUK's competition here
BHFAP vs PRU Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while PRU trades at $93.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check PRU's competition here
BHFAP vs MET-PF Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while MET-PF trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check MET-PF's competition here
BHFAP vs UNM Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while UNM trades at $72.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check UNM's competition here
BHFAP vs GL Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while GL trades at $139.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check GL's competition here
BHFAP vs PRH Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while PRH trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check PRH's competition here
BHFAP vs PRS Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while PRS trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check PRS's competition here
BHFAP vs PRI Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while PRI trades at $249.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check PRI's competition here
BHFAP vs JXN Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while JXN trades at $103.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is -431.00. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check JXN's competition here
BHFAP vs LNC Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while LNC trades at $33.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check LNC's competition here
BHFAP vs LNC-PD Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while LNC-PD trades at $26.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check LNC-PD's competition here
BHFAP vs AEL Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check AEL's competition here
BHFAP vs FGN Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while FGN trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check FGN's competition here
BHFAP vs CNO Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while CNO trades at $40.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check CNO's competition here
BHFAP vs BHF Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while BHF trades at $59.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check BHF's competition here
BHFAP vs GNW Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while GNW trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check GNW's competition here
BHFAP vs FG Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while FG trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check FG's competition here
BHFAP vs ABLLL Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while ABLLL trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check ABLLL's competition here
BHFAP vs BHFAL Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while BHFAL trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check BHFAL's competition here
BHFAP vs MLCIL Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while MLCIL trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check MLCIL's competition here
BHFAP vs AEL-PB Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check AEL-PB's competition here
BHFAP vs NWLI Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check NWLI's competition here
BHFAP vs JXN-PA Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while JXN-PA trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check JXN-PA's competition here
BHFAP vs AEL-PA Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check AEL-PA's competition here
BHFAP vs MHNC Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while MHNC trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check MHNC's competition here
BHFAP vs GL-PD Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while GL-PD trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check GL-PD's competition here
BHFAP vs ABX Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 971.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while ABX trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 198.70. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check ABX's competition here
BHFAP vs ABL Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 958M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while ABL trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 196.00. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check ABL's competition here
BHFAP vs BHFAO Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 922.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while BHFAO trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check BHFAO's competition here
BHFAP vs LIFE Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 750M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while LIFE trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check LIFE's competition here
BHFAP vs BHFAN Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 732.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while BHFAN trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check BHFAN's competition here
BHFAP vs BHFAM Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 649M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while BHFAM trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check BHFAM's competition here
BHFAP vs ABLLW Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check ABLLW's competition here
BHFAP vs CIA Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 242.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while CIA trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check CIA's competition here
BHFAP vs VERY Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check VERY's competition here
BHFAP vs MDWT Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check MDWT's competition here
BHFAP vs AAME Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while AAME trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check AAME's competition here
BHFAP vs GWGH Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check GWGH's competition here
BHFAP vs LFC Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check LFC's competition here
BHFAP vs IHC Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check IHC's competition here
BHFAP vs MLG Comparison March 2026
BHFAP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAP stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAP is priced at $15.79, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAP currently has a P/E ratio of 1.25, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAP's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAP is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAP.Check MLG's competition here