Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
Brighthouse Financial, Inc. BHF Peers
See (BHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHF | $61.15 | +0.01% | 3.51B | 7.82 | $7.82 | N/A |
| AFL | $105.62 | -0.76% | 57.10B | 16.43 | $6.43 | +1.97% |
| MFC | $31.80 | -0.84% | 54.80B | 16.83 | $1.89 | +3.78% |
| MET-PE | $23.68 | +0.38% | 54.22B | 3.03 | $7.81 | +2.74% |
| MET-PA | $24.38 | -0.08% | 54.13B | 3.12 | $7.81 | +2.74% |
| MET | $80.33 | -0.67% | 53.93B | 13.13 | $6.12 | +2.74% |
| PRH | $24.66 | +0.08% | 38.26B | N/A | N/A | +6.03% |
| PRS | $23.02 | -0.04% | 37.98B | N/A | N/A | +6.11% |
| PRU | $105.87 | -1.95% | 37.48B | 16.70 | $6.34 | +5.01% |
| PUK | $23.13 | -0.60% | 30.00B | 13.77 | $1.68 | +2.00% |
Stock Comparison
BHF vs AFL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 57.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while AFL trades at $105.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MFC Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 54.80B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while MFC trades at $31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MET-PE Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 54.22B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while MET-PE trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MET-PA Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 54.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while MET-PA trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MET Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 53.93B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while MET trades at $80.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs PRH Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 38.26B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while PRH trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs PRS Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 37.98B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while PRS trades at $23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs PRU Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 37.48B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while PRU trades at $105.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs PUK Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 30.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while PUK trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs UNM Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while UNM trades at $82.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MET-PF Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.25B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while MET-PF trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs GL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 10.09B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while GL trades at $122.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs GL-PD Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 10.02B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while GL-PD trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs PRI Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 9.15B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while PRI trades at $278.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs JXN Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while JXN trades at $85.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 64.42. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs LNC Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while LNC trades at $33.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs LNC-PD Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while LNC-PD trades at $26.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs AEL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs FG Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while FG trades at $32.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs FGN Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.32B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while FGN trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs CNO Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while CNO trades at $39.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs BHFAL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while BHFAL trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs BHFAP Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while BHFAP trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs GNW Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while GNW trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs JXN-PA Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while JXN-PA trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs AEL-PB Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs NWLI Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs AEL-PA Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MHNC Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while MHNC trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF and MHNC have similar daily volatility (1.86).
BHF vs BHFAO Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while BHFAO trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs BHFAN Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 945.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while BHFAN trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs BHFAM Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 870.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while BHFAM trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs ABLLW Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 851.94M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while ABLLW trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs ABLLL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 851.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while ABLLL trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs ABL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 837.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while ABL trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -32.44. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs CIA Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 195.08M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while CIA trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs VERY Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170.02M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MDWT Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs AAME Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 3.51B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 34.88M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $61.15, while AAME trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.82, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -17.10. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.