Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
Brighthouse Financial, Inc. BHF Peers
See (BHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHF | $49.76 | -2.12% | 2.9B | 6.36 | $7.82 | N/A |
| MET-PA | $24.01 | +0.04% | 55B | 3.08 | $7.81 | +3.58% |
| AFL | $101.12 | -0.70% | 54.7B | 15.73 | $6.43 | +2.12% |
| MET-PE | $23.98 | +0.29% | 53.7B | 3.06 | $7.81 | +3.58% |
| MFC | $30.51 | -1.01% | 52.3B | 15.73 | $1.94 | +4.01% |
| MET | $76.33 | -1.06% | 51.3B | 12.48 | $6.12 | +3.58% |
| PRH | $25.28 | -0.35% | 38.6B | N/A | N/A | +5.88% |
| PRS | $24.06 | -0.25% | 37.5B | N/A | N/A | +5.83% |
| PRU | $102.11 | -1.12% | 36.2B | 16.11 | $6.34 | +5.15% |
| PUK | $24.74 | +0.37% | 31.9B | 14.73 | $1.68 | +1.86% |
Stock Comparison
BHF vs MET-PA Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while MET-PA trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs AFL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while AFL trades at $101.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MET-PE Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while MET-PE trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MFC Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while MFC trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MET Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while MET trades at $76.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs PRH Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while PRH trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs PRS Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while PRS trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs PRU Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while PRU trades at $102.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs PUK Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while PUK trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs UNM Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while UNM trades at $79.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MET-PF Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while MET-PF trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs GL-PD Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while GL-PD trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs GL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while GL trades at $120.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs PRI Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while PRI trades at $263.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs JXN Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while JXN trades at $87.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 66.13. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs LNC Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while LNC trades at $34.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs LNC-PD Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while LNC-PD trades at $27.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs AEL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs FGN Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while FGN trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs FG Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while FG trades at $30.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs CNO Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while CNO trades at $37.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs GNW Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while GNW trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs BHFAL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while BHFAL trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs BHFAP Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while BHFAP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs JXN-PA Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while JXN-PA trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs AEL-PB Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs NWLI Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs AEL-PA Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MHNC Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while MHNC trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs BHFAO Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while BHFAO trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.24. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs BHFAN Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 710.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while BHFAN trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs BHFAM Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 620M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while BHFAM trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs ABL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 510.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while ABL trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs ABLLL Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 499.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while ABLLL trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs ABLLW Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while ABLLW trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs CIA Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 183M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while CIA trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs VERY Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs MDWT Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs AAME Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while AAME trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -21.80. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs GWGH Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs IHC Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.
BHF vs LFC Comparison
BHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHF is priced at $49.76, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.36, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHF is more volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHF.