BurgerFi International, Inc.

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 235B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while MCD trades at $327.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MCD's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check MCD's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while SBUX trades at $95.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 81.24. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check SBUX's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while CMG trades at $37.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 32.93. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check CMG's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while YUM trades at $163.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check YUM's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while DRI trades at $212.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check DRI's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while QSR trades at $68.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check QSR's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while YUMC trades at $54.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check YUMC's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while DPZ trades at $385.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check DPZ's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while TXRH trades at $182.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check TXRH's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while BROS trades at $49.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 76.28. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check BROS's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while CAVA trades at $68.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 60.45. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check CAVA's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while WING trades at $259.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check WING's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while EAT trades at $150.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EAT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check EAT's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while SHAK trades at $93.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 91.75. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check SHAK's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while CAKE trades at $62.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check CAKE's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while ARCO trades at $8.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check ARCO's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while WEN trades at $8.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check WEN's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while BH-A trades at $2,100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is 190.79. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BH-A's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check BH-A's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while BH trades at $399.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BH's P/E ratio is 181.60. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check BH's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while PZZA trades at $32.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check PZZA's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while HDL trades at $17.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check HDL's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 971.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while FWRG trades at $15.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 199.00. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check FWRG's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 911.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while BJRI trades at $41.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check BJRI's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 871.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while KRUS trades at $69.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -218.09. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check KRUS's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check TWNPV's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 792.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while CNNE trades at $13.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check CNNE's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 753.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while CBRL trades at $32.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 45.61. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check CBRL's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while RUTH trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check RUTH's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 684.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while SG trades at $6.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check SG's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while CHUY trades at $37.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check CHUY's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 551.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while BLMN trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check BLMN's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while PBPB trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check PBPB's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while TAST trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check TAST's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 466M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while DIN trades at $33.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check DIN's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 414.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while NATH trades at $101.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check NATH's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 407.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while PTLO trades at $5.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check PTLO's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 325.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while LOCO trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check LOCO's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while DENN trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check DENN's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while JACK trades at $18.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check JACK's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while FRGI trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check FRGI's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 222.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while VENU trades at $5.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check VENU's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 202.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while RICK trades at $23.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check RICK's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while BBQ trades at $17.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check BBQ's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while THCHW trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check THCHW's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while MB trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check MB's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while STKS trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check STKS's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while RRGB trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check RRGB's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while BDL trades at $32.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check BDL's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while GENK trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check GENK's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while THCH trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check THCH's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while GRIL trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GRIL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check GRIL's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while FATAV trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check FATAV's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while RAVE trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check RAVE's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while FATBW trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check FATBW's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while NDLS trades at $4.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check NDLS's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while PC trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check PC's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while ARKR trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check ARKR's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while MYT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check MYT's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while HCHL trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check HCHL's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while FATBB trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check FATBB's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while GTIM trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check GTIM's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while REBN trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to REBN's ROE of +22.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check REBN's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while YOSH trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check YOSH's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while BTBD trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check BTBD's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while BTB trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check BTB's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while FATBV trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check FATBV's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while FAT trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check FAT's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while TWNP trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check TWNP's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while CHSN trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check CHSN's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while FATBP trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check FATBP's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while PNST trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check PNST's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 910.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while BTBDW trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check BTBDW's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check BFIIW's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while ONDR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check ONDR's competition here

BFI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BFI stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BFI is priced at $0.08, while LUB trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BFI's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BFI is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BFI.Check LUB's competition here