Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. (BDL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BDL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDL | $32.59 | +0.00% | 60.6M | 10.48 | $3.11 | +1.69% |
| MCD | $327.11 | +0.00% | 235B | 27.53 | $11.96 | +2.18% |
| SBUX | $95.80 | +0.00% | 111.1B | 81.24 | $1.20 | +2.53% |
| CMG | $37.97 | +0.00% | 49.6B | 32.93 | $1.14 | N/A |
| YUM | $163.48 | +0.00% | 45.3B | 29.37 | $5.56 | +1.76% |
| DRI | $212.98 | +0.00% | 25.3B | 22.77 | $9.54 | +2.72% |
| QSR | $68.58 | +0.00% | 22.6B | 26.17 | $2.63 | +3.60% |
| YUMC | $54.61 | +0.00% | 18.9B | 21.37 | $2.51 | +1.79% |
| DPZ | $385.13 | +0.00% | 13B | 22.48 | $17.11 | +1.81% |
| TXRH | $182.53 | +0.00% | 11.9B | 27.34 | $6.54 | +1.53% |
Stock Comparison
BDL vs MCD Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 235B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while MCD trades at $327.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCD's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check MCD's competition here
BDL vs SBUX Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while SBUX trades at $95.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 81.24. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check SBUX's competition here
BDL vs CMG Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while CMG trades at $37.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 32.93. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check CMG's competition here
BDL vs YUM Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while YUM trades at $163.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check YUM's competition here
BDL vs DRI Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while DRI trades at $212.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check DRI's competition here
BDL vs QSR Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while QSR trades at $68.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check QSR's competition here
BDL vs YUMC Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while YUMC trades at $54.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check YUMC's competition here
BDL vs DPZ Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while DPZ trades at $385.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check DPZ's competition here
BDL vs TXRH Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while TXRH trades at $182.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check TXRH's competition here
BDL vs BROS Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while BROS trades at $49.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 76.28. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check BROS's competition here
BDL vs CAVA Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while CAVA trades at $68.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 60.45. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check CAVA's competition here
BDL vs WING Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while WING trades at $259.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check WING's competition here
BDL vs EAT Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, EAT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while EAT trades at $150.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas EAT's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EAT's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to EAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check EAT's competition here
BDL vs SHAK Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while SHAK trades at $93.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 91.75. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check SHAK's competition here
BDL vs CAKE Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while CAKE trades at $62.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check CAKE's competition here
BDL vs ARCO Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while ARCO trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check ARCO's competition here
BDL vs WEN Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while WEN trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check WEN's competition here
BDL vs BH-A Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while BH-A trades at $2,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is 190.79. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BH-A's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check BH-A's competition here
BDL vs BH Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while BH trades at $399.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BH's P/E ratio is 181.60. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check BH's competition here
BDL vs PZZA Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while PZZA trades at $32.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check PZZA's competition here
BDL vs HDL Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while HDL trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check HDL's competition here
BDL vs FWRG Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 971.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while FWRG trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 199.00. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check FWRG's competition here
BDL vs BJRI Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 911.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while BJRI trades at $41.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check BJRI's competition here
BDL vs KRUS Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 871.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while KRUS trades at $69.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -218.09. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check KRUS's competition here
BDL vs TWNPV Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check TWNPV's competition here
BDL vs CNNE Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 792.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while CNNE trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check CNNE's competition here
BDL vs CBRL Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 753.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while CBRL trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is 45.61. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBRL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check CBRL's competition here
BDL vs RUTH Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check RUTH's competition here
BDL vs SG Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 684.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while SG trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas SG's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check SG's competition here
BDL vs CHUY Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check CHUY's competition here
BDL vs BLMN Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 551.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while BLMN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLMN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check BLMN's competition here
BDL vs PBPB Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while PBPB trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL and PBPB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBPB's competition here
BDL vs TAST Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check TAST's competition here
BDL vs DIN Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 466M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while DIN trades at $33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check DIN's competition here
BDL vs NATH Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 414.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while NATH trades at $101.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check NATH's competition here
BDL vs PTLO Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 407.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while PTLO trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check PTLO's competition here
BDL vs LOCO Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 325.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while LOCO trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check LOCO's competition here
BDL vs DENN Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while DENN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check DENN's competition here
BDL vs JACK Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while JACK trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JACK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check JACK's competition here
BDL vs FRGI Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check FRGI's competition here
BDL vs VENU Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 222.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while VENU trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check VENU's competition here
BDL vs RICK Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 202.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while RICK trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RICK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check RICK's competition here
BDL vs BBQ Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check BBQ's competition here
BDL vs THCHW Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check THCHW's competition here
BDL vs MB Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while MB trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check MB's competition here
BDL vs STKS Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while STKS trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check STKS's competition here
BDL vs RRGB Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while RRGB trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check RRGB's competition here
BDL vs GENK Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while GENK trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check GENK's competition here
BDL vs THCH Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while THCH trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check THCH's competition here
BDL vs GRIL Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRIL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check GRIL's competition here
BDL vs FATAV Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check FATAV's competition here
BDL vs RAVE Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while RAVE trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check RAVE's competition here
BDL vs FATBW Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check FATBW's competition here
BDL vs NDLS Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while NDLS trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check NDLS's competition here
BDL vs PC Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while PC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL and PC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PC's competition here
BDL vs ARKR Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while ARKR trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check ARKR's competition here
BDL vs MYT Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check MYT's competition here
BDL vs HCHL Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while HCHL trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check HCHL's competition here
BDL vs FATBB Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while FATBB trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check FATBB's competition here
BDL vs GTIM Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while GTIM trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check GTIM's competition here
BDL vs REBN Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while REBN trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REBN's ROE of +22.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check REBN's competition here
BDL vs YOSH Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while YOSH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check YOSH's competition here
BDL vs BTBD Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while BTBD trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check BTBD's competition here
BDL vs BTB Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check BTB's competition here
BDL vs FATBV Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check FATBV's competition here
BDL vs FAT Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while FAT trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check FAT's competition here
BDL vs TWNP Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while TWNP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL and TWNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TWNP's competition here
BDL vs CHSN Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while CHSN trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHSN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check CHSN's competition here
BDL vs BFI Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check BFI's competition here
BDL vs FATBP Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while FATBP trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check FATBP's competition here
BDL vs PNST Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while PNST trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check PNST's competition here
BDL vs BTBDW Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 910.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while BTBDW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check BTBDW's competition here
BDL vs BFIIW Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check BFIIW's competition here
BDL vs ONDR Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BDL and ONDR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ONDR's competition here
BDL vs LUB Comparison February 2026
BDL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BDL stands at 60.6M. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BDL is priced at $32.59, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BDL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.48, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BDL's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BDL is less volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BDL.Check LUB's competition here