Southern California Bancorp
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BCAL
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BCAL
Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BCAL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCAL | $18.02 | +1.46% | 581.9M | 9.33 | $1.93 | +1.12% |
| USB-PA | $756.72 | -0.10% | 1.3T | 215.95 | $3.51 | +3.85% |
| HDB | $25.48 | +2.62% | 131.7B | 17.83 | $1.44 | +4.30% |
| MFG | $8.16 | -0.06% | 101.2B | 15.46 | $0.53 | +2.10% |
| IBN | $26.11 | +1.93% | 93.2B | 16.60 | $1.57 | +0.99% |
| ITUB | $8.34 | +0.00% | 92.8B | 10.94 | $0.77 | +7.21% |
| PNC | $213.73 | +0.96% | 86B | 12.84 | $16.60 | +3.15% |
| USB | $53.51 | +1.05% | 83.1B | 11.57 | $4.62 | +3.85% |
| LYG | $5.18 | -0.67% | 76.9B | 14.15 | $0.37 | +3.16% |
| USB-PP | $21.71 | +0.09% | 68.2B | 4.69 | $4.64 | +3.85% |
Stock Comparison
BCAL vs USB-PA Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while USB-PA trades at $756.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 215.95. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check USB-PA's competition here
BCAL vs HDB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 131.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while HDB trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check HDB's competition here
BCAL vs MFG Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while MFG trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check MFG's competition here
BCAL vs IBN Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 93.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while IBN trades at $26.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check IBN's competition here
BCAL vs ITUB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while ITUB trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check ITUB's competition here
BCAL vs PNC Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while PNC trades at $213.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check PNC's competition here
BCAL vs USB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while USB trades at $53.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check USB's competition here
BCAL vs LYG Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while LYG trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check LYG's competition here
BCAL vs USB-PP Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while USB-PP trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check USB-PP's competition here
BCAL vs USB-PS Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while USB-PS trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check USB-PS's competition here
BCAL vs USB-PH Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while USB-PH trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check USB-PH's competition here
BCAL vs TFC Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while TFC trades at $47.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check TFC's competition here
BCAL vs DB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while DB trades at $29.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check DB's competition here
BCAL vs BSBR Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while BSBR trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check BSBR's competition here
BCAL vs BBD Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while BBD trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check BBD's competition here
BCAL vs HBANL Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while HBANL trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check HBANL's competition here
BCAL vs HBANZ Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while HBANZ trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check HBANZ's competition here
BCAL vs KB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while KB trades at $98.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check KB's competition here
BCAL vs BBDO Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while BBDO trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check BBDO's competition here
BCAL vs HBANM Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while HBANM trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check HBANM's competition here
BCAL vs FITB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FITB trades at $47.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FITB's competition here
BCAL vs MTB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while MTB trades at $211.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check MTB's competition here
BCAL vs SHG Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while SHG trades at $61.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check SHG's competition here
BCAL vs BAP Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while BAP trades at $335.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check BAP's competition here
BCAL vs TFC-PO Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while TFC-PO trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check TFC-PO's competition here
BCAL vs KEY-PL Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while KEY-PL trades at $24.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check KEY-PL's competition here
BCAL vs CFG Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CFG trades at $61.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check CFG's competition here
BCAL vs HBANP Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while HBANP trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check HBANP's competition here
BCAL vs USB-PR Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while USB-PR trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check USB-PR's competition here
BCAL vs TFC-PI Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while TFC-PI trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check TFC-PI's competition here
BCAL vs TFC-PR Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while TFC-PR trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check TFC-PR's competition here
BCAL vs HBAN Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while HBAN trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check HBAN's competition here
BCAL vs FITBM Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FITBM trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FITBM's competition here
BCAL vs USB-PQ Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while USB-PQ trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check USB-PQ's competition here
BCAL vs RF Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while RF trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check RF's competition here
BCAL vs FCNCA Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FCNCA trades at $1,917.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FCNCA's competition here
BCAL vs KEY Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while KEY trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check KEY's competition here
BCAL vs FCNCN Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FCNCN trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FCNCN's competition here
BCAL vs RF-PF Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while RF-PF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check RF-PF's competition here
BCAL vs KEY-PJ Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
BCAL vs RF-PC Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while RF-PC trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check RF-PC's competition here
BCAL vs KEY-PI Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while KEY-PI trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check KEY-PI's competition here
BCAL vs CIB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CIB trades at $72.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check CIB's competition here
BCAL vs BCH Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while BCH trades at $36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check BCH's competition here
BCAL vs KEY-PK Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while KEY-PK trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check KEY-PK's competition here
BCAL vs FITBI Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FITBI trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FITBI's competition here
BCAL vs WF Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while WF trades at $64.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check WF's competition here
BCAL vs BSAC Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while BSAC trades at $32.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check BSAC's competition here
BCAL vs FITBP Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FITBP trades at $23.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FITBP's competition here
BCAL vs CFG-PD Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check CFG-PD's competition here
BCAL vs RF-PE Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while RF-PE trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check RF-PE's competition here
BCAL vs VLYPN Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while VLYPN trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check VLYPN's competition here
BCAL vs FHN-PC Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FHN-PC trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FHN-PC's competition here
BCAL vs FITBO Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FITBO trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FITBO's competition here
BCAL vs FHN-PB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FHN-PB's competition here
BCAL vs FHN-PE Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FHN-PE trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FHN-PE's competition here
BCAL vs CFG-PH Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CFG-PH trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check CFG-PH's competition here
BCAL vs CMA Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check CMA's competition here
BCAL vs WBS Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while WBS trades at $69.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check WBS's competition here
BCAL vs FHN Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FHN trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FHN's competition here
BCAL vs SSB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while SSB trades at $93.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check SSB's competition here
BCAL vs WTFC Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while WTFC trades at $140.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check WTFC's competition here
BCAL vs BPOP Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while BPOP trades at $141.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check BPOP's competition here
BCAL vs ONBPO Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while ONBPO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check ONBPO's competition here
BCAL vs ONBPP Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while ONBPP trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check ONBPP's competition here
BCAL vs FHN-PD Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FHN-PD's competition here
BCAL vs FHN-PF Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FHN-PF trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FHN-PF's competition here
BCAL vs CFR Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CFR trades at $140.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL and CFR have similar daily volatility (1.11).Check CFR's competition here
BCAL vs UMBF Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while UMBF trades at $116.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check UMBF's competition here
BCAL vs ONB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while ONB trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check ONB's competition here
BCAL vs ZION Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while ZION trades at $58.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check ZION's competition here
BCAL vs CFG-PE Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CFG-PE trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 3.96. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check CFG-PE's competition here
BCAL vs WAL Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while WAL trades at $71.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check WAL's competition here
BCAL vs BOKF Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while BOKF trades at $131.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check BOKF's competition here
BCAL vs CADE Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check CADE's competition here
BCAL vs CHYM Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CHYM trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check CHYM's competition here
BCAL vs GGAL Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while GGAL trades at $45.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 52.51. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check GGAL's competition here
BCAL vs BSMX Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check BSMX's competition here
BCAL vs CBSH Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CBSH trades at $50.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check CBSH's competition here
BCAL vs VLY Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while VLY trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check VLY's competition here
BCAL vs SNV Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check SNV's competition here
BCAL vs PB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while PB trades at $67.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check PB's competition here
BCAL vs PNFP Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while PNFP trades at $88.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check PNFP's competition here
BCAL vs SNV-PD Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check SNV-PD's competition here
BCAL vs COLB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while COLB trades at $27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check COLB's competition here
BCAL vs CUBI-PE Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
BCAL vs FNB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FNB trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FNB's competition here
BCAL vs GBCI Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while GBCI trades at $46.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check GBCI's competition here
BCAL vs UBSI Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while UBSI trades at $42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check UBSI's competition here
BCAL vs CBC Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while CBC trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check CBC's competition here
BCAL vs FLG Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while FLG trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -27.14. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check FLG's competition here
BCAL vs IFS Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while IFS trades at $49.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check IFS's competition here
BCAL vs VLYPP Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while VLYPP trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check VLYPP's competition here
BCAL vs HOMB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while HOMB trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check HOMB's competition here
BCAL vs ABCB Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while ABCB trades at $79.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check ABCB's competition here
BCAL vs VLYPO Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while VLYPO trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check VLYPO's competition here
BCAL vs HWC Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while HWC trades at $65.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check HWC's competition here
BCAL vs AVAL Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while AVAL trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check AVAL's competition here
BCAL vs BXS Comparison April 2026
BCAL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BCAL stands at 581.9M. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BCAL is priced at $18.02, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BCAL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.33, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BCAL's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BCAL is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BCAL.Check BXS's competition here