Golden Minerals Company
Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AUMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUMN | $0.24 | -4.04% | 3.7M | -0.91 | -$0.27 | N/A |
| TFPM | $23.39 | -0.95% | 4.9B | 788.83 | $0.03 | +0.93% |
| BVN | $17.10 | -3.85% | 4.4B | 10.60 | $1.64 | +1.69% |
| PPTA | $15.93 | -5.43% | 1.7B | -55.90 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| SILV | $11.55 | -0.86% | 1.7B | 19.91 | $0.58 | N/A |
| EXK | $5.55 | -2.72% | 1.7B | -22.88 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| GATO | $14.40 | -3.10% | 1B | 30.64 | $0.47 | N/A |
| SLSR | $4.83 | -2.82% | 819.7M | -9.76 | -$0.51 | N/A |
| MMX | $5.00 | +2.88% | 741.6M | 29.24 | $0.17 | N/A |
| MUX | $10.80 | -6.09% | 613.3M | -19.93 | -$0.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AUMN vs TFPM Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while TFPM trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 788.83. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check TFPM's competition here
AUMN vs BVN Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while BVN trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check BVN's competition here
AUMN vs PPTA Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while PPTA trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -55.90. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check PPTA's competition here
AUMN vs SILV Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check SILV's competition here
AUMN vs EXK Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while EXK trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -22.88. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check EXK's competition here
AUMN vs GATO Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check GATO's competition here
AUMN vs SLSR Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 819.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while SLSR trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +20.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check SLSR's competition here
AUMN vs MMX Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check MMX's competition here
AUMN vs MUX Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 613.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while MUX trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is -19.93. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to MUX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check MUX's competition here
AUMN vs ASM Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 514.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while ASM trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check ASM's competition here
AUMN vs NSR Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check NSR's competition here
AUMN vs GROY Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 461.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while GROY trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -135.25. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check GROY's competition here
AUMN vs MTA Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 388.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while MTA trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -83.90. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check MTA's competition here
AUMN vs NEWP Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 289.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while NEWP trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -56.33. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check NEWP's competition here
AUMN vs ITRG Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 262M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while ITRG trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check ITRG's competition here
AUMN vs PLG Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 187.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while PLG trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check PLG's competition here
AUMN vs VOXR Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 166.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while VOXR trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is -82.00. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to VOXR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check VOXR's competition here
AUMN vs GROY-WT Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 133M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while GROY-WT trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check GROY-WT's competition here
AUMN vs ATLX Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while ATLX trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check ATLX's competition here
AUMN vs TRQ Comparison July 2025
AUMN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AUMN stands at 3.7M. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AUMN is priced at $0.24, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, AUMN's ROE is +5.93%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AUMN is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AUMN.Check TRQ's competition here