Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V.
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. ASR Peers
See (ASR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASR | $316.50 | +1.03% | 9.3B | 13.10 | $23.86 | +9.64% |
| DAL | $49.18 | +0.42% | 32.4B | 8.79 | $5.64 | +1.21% |
| UAL | $79.40 | +2.39% | 25.9B | 7.20 | $10.99 | N/A |
| LUV | $32.15 | +1.98% | 18.3B | 36.13 | $0.89 | +2.23% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $40.43 | +0.99% | 12.1B | 11.30 | $3.55 | +1.58% |
| PAC | $229.29 | +1.99% | 11.4B | 24.25 | $9.35 | +5.07% |
| JOBY-WT | $2.46 | +24.87% | 7.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JOBY | $10.82 | +14.08% | 7.5B | -11.25 | -$0.84 | N/A |
| AAL | $11.22 | +0.81% | 7.4B | 11.28 | $1.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ASR vs DAL Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while DAL trades at $49.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs UAL Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while UAL trades at $79.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs LUV Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while LUV trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs CEA Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs LTM Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while LTM trades at $40.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs PAC Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while PAC trades at $229.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs JOBY-WT Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while JOBY-WT trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs JOBY Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while JOBY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs AAL Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while AAL trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs RYAAY Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while RYAAY trades at $57.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs ALK Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while ALK trades at $49.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs OMAB Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while OMAB trades at $105.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs CPA Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while CPA trades at $108.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs GOL Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs SKYW Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while SKYW trades at $102.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs PBI-PB Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while PBI-PB trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs CAAP Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while CAAP trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs AAWW Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs JBLU Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while JBLU trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs ATSG Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs ALGT Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while ALGT trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs HA Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HA's ROE of +18.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs UP Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 901.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while UP trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UP's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs ULCC Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 822.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while ULCC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ULCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs SNCY Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 631.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while SNCY trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs VLRS Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 536.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while VLRS trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VLRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs BLDEW Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 342.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while BLDEW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs BLDE Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while BLDE trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -12.52. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLDE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs ASLE Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while ASLE trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is -55.27. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ASLE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs FLYX Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while FLYX trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs AZUL Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs FLYY Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 129M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while FLYY trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs MATH Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while MATH trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs SAVE Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs SRFM Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while SRFM trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs MESA Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while MESA trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MESA's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs SOAR Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while SOAR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SOAR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs FLYX-WT Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs ZNH Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.
ASR vs ASLEW Comparison
ASR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASR stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASR is priced at $316.50, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.10, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, ASR's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASR is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASR.