Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. ASM Peers
See (ASM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASM | $3.90 | +2.36% | 563.1M | 38.90 | $0.10 | N/A |
| TFPM | $23.28 | -1.02% | 4.7B | 775.67 | $0.03 | +1.17% |
| BVN | $16.50 | +0.61% | 4.2B | 10.07 | $1.64 | +2.21% |
| SILV | $11.55 | -0.86% | 1.7B | 19.91 | $0.58 | N/A |
| EXK | $5.44 | +2.84% | 1.6B | -21.74 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| PPTA | $14.58 | +11.64% | 1.5B | -50.29 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| GATO | $14.40 | -3.10% | 1B | 30.64 | $0.47 | N/A |
| SLSR | $5.57 | +3.34% | 921.7M | -10.98 | -$0.51 | N/A |
| MMX | $5.00 | +2.88% | 741.6M | 29.24 | $0.17 | N/A |
| MUX | $10.64 | -1.02% | 575M | -18.68 | -$0.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ASM vs TFPM Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while TFPM trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 775.67. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs BVN Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while BVN trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs SILV Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs EXK Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while EXK trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -21.74. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs PPTA Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while PPTA trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -50.29. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs GATO Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs SLSR Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 921.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while SLSR trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +20.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs MMX Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs MUX Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 575M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while MUX trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs NSR Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs GROY Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 404.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while GROY trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -118.75. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs MTA Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 370.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while MTA trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -80.10. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs NEWP Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while NEWP trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -50.93. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs ITRG Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 248.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while ITRG trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -147.00. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs PLG Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while PLG trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -33.30. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs VOXR Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while VOXR trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is -77.00. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VOXR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs GROY-WT Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while GROY-WT trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs ATLX Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while ATLX trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs AUMN Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while AUMN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUMN's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.
ASM vs TRQ Comparison
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 563.1M. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.90, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.90, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.