Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ASM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASM | $3.49 | +3.56% | 505.2M | 34.90 | $0.10 | N/A |
| TFPM | $24.48 | +2.56% | 5.1B | 816.00 | $0.03 | +0.92% |
| BVN | $17.89 | +2.23% | 4.5B | 10.91 | $1.64 | +1.67% |
| PPTA | $16.68 | -0.36% | 1.8B | -57.52 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| SILV | $11.55 | -0.86% | 1.7B | 19.91 | $0.58 | N/A |
| EXK | $5.25 | +0.77% | 1.5B | -20.19 | -$0.26 | N/A |
| GATO | $14.40 | -3.10% | 1B | 30.64 | $0.47 | N/A |
| SLSR | $4.99 | +1.84% | 821.3M | -9.78 | -$0.51 | N/A |
| MMX | $5.00 | +2.88% | 741.6M | 29.24 | $0.17 | N/A |
| MUX | $10.65 | +2.36% | 574.7M | -18.68 | -$0.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ASM vs TFPM Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while TFPM trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 816.00. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check TFPM's competition here
ASM vs BVN Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while BVN trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check BVN's competition here
ASM vs PPTA Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while PPTA trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -57.52. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check PPTA's competition here
ASM vs SILV Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check SILV's competition here
ASM vs EXK Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while EXK trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -20.19. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check EXK's competition here
ASM vs GATO Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check GATO's competition here
ASM vs SLSR Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 821.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while SLSR trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -9.78. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +20.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check SLSR's competition here
ASM vs MMX Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check MMX's competition here
ASM vs MUX Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 574.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while MUX trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MUX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check MUX's competition here
ASM vs GROY Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 486.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while GROY trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -142.75. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check GROY's competition here
ASM vs NSR Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check NSR's competition here
ASM vs MTA Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 388.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while MTA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check MTA's competition here
ASM vs NEWP Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 271.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while NEWP trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -52.83. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check NEWP's competition here
ASM vs ITRG Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while ITRG trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -156.00. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check ITRG's competition here
ASM vs PLG Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while PLG trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -39.87. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check PLG's competition here
ASM vs VOXR Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while VOXR trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is -81.25. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VOXR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check VOXR's competition here
ASM vs GROY-WT Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while GROY-WT trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check GROY-WT's competition here
ASM vs ATLX Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 116.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while ATLX trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check ATLX's competition here
ASM vs AUMN Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while AUMN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUMN's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check AUMN's competition here
ASM vs TRQ Comparison August 2025
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 505.2M. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $3.49, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check TRQ's competition here