Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ASM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASM | $6.53 | -0.91% | 1.1B | 38.29 | $0.17 | N/A |
| BVN | $36.41 | -2.07% | 9.3B | 11.05 | $3.30 | +1.18% |
| TFPM | $35.81 | -0.25% | 7.4B | 30.37 | $1.18 | +0.64% |
| AUGO | $87.69 | +0.34% | 7.3B | -86.82 | -$1.01 | +2.12% |
| ELVR | $58.91 | -4.26% | 4.4B | -3.55 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| ALM | $15.36 | +2.26% | 4B | -27.43 | -$0.56 | N/A |
| ARIS | $19.31 | -1.53% | 4B | 47.06 | $0.41 | +1.45% |
| PPTA | $29.43 | -0.30% | 3.6B | -27.25 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| GMTL | $19.03 | -1.25% | 3.2B | -95.15 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| FSM | $10.27 | -1.53% | 3.2B | 12.08 | $0.85 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ASM vs BVN Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while BVN trades at $36.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check BVN's competition here
ASM vs TFPM Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while TFPM trades at $35.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check TFPM's competition here
ASM vs AUGO Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while AUGO trades at $87.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is -86.82. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check AUGO's competition here
ASM vs ELVR Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while ELVR trades at $58.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check ELVR's competition here
ASM vs ALM Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while ALM trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -27.43. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check ALM's competition here
ASM vs ARIS Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while ARIS trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 47.06. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check ARIS's competition here
ASM vs PPTA Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while PPTA trades at $29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -27.25. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPTA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check PPTA's competition here
ASM vs GMTL Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GMTL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while GMTL trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas GMTL's P/E ratio is -95.15. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to GMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check GMTL's competition here
ASM vs FSM Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FSM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while FSM trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas FSM's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FSM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to FSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check FSM's competition here
ASM vs FRGOX Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FRGOX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while FRGOX trades at $41.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas FRGOX's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to FRGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check FRGOX's competition here
ASM vs EXK Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while EXK trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -22.73. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check EXK's competition here
ASM vs SILV Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check SILV's competition here
ASM vs CNL Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while CNL trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -31.36. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check CNL's competition here
ASM vs SLSR Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while SLSR trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -33.81. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check SLSR's competition here
ASM vs MUX Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while MUX trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check MUX's competition here
ASM vs ELE Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while ELE trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is 319.83. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check ELE's competition here
ASM vs GATO Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check GATO's competition here
ASM vs NEWP Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 794.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while NEWP trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -215.75. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check NEWP's competition here
ASM vs MMX Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check MMX's competition here
ASM vs SCZM Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SCZM has a market cap of 715.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while SCZM trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas SCZM's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCZM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to SCZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check SCZM's competition here
ASM vs GROY Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 643.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while GROY trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -183.50. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check GROY's competition here
ASM vs MTA Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 628.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while MTA trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -226.30. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check MTA's competition here
ASM vs ITRG Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 490.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while ITRG trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -289.50. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check ITRG's competition here
ASM vs NSR Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check NSR's competition here
ASM vs GROY-WT Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 298.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while GROY-WT trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check GROY-WT's competition here
ASM vs VOXR Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 291.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while VOXR trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is 52.60. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOXR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check VOXR's competition here
ASM vs PLG Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 222.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while PLG trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check PLG's competition here
ASM vs NVA Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while NVA trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check NVA's competition here
ASM vs ATLX Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while ATLX trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check ATLX's competition here
ASM vs NEXM Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while NEXM trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check NEXM's competition here
ASM vs ALOY Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while ALOY trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check ALOY's competition here
ASM vs GRML Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GRML has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while GRML trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas GRML's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to GRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check GRML's competition here
ASM vs GRMLW Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GRMLW has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while GRMLW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas GRMLW's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRMLW's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is less volatile compared to GRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check GRMLW's competition here
ASM vs AUMN Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while AUMN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUMN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check AUMN's competition here
ASM vs HDLS Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HDLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check HDLS's competition here
ASM vs ERS Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ERS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while ERS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas ERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ERS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to ERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check ERS's competition here
ASM vs SWC Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SWC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while SWC trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas SWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to SWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check SWC's competition here
ASM vs ATL Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ATL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while ATL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas ATL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ASM has daily volatility of 8.37 and ATL has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATL's competition here
ASM vs TRQ Comparison April 2026
ASM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASM stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASM is priced at $6.53, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASM currently has a P/E ratio of 38.29, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, ASM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASM is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASM.Check TRQ's competition here