The Allstate Corporation

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 141.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while PGR trades at $241.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check PGR's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 106.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while CB trades at $267.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check CB's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while TRV trades at $258.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check TRV's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while ALL-PH trades at $21.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check ALL-PH's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while ALL-PB trades at $26.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check ALL-PB's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check ALL-PG's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while WRB trades at $69.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check WRB's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while WRB-PF trades at $19.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check WRB-PF's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while WRB-PE trades at $22.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check WRB-PE's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while WRB-PG trades at $16.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check WRB-PG's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while WRB-PH trades at $16.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check WRB-PH's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while MKL trades at $1,929.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check MKL's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while CINF trades at $146.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check CINF's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while L trades at $90.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check L's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while CNA trades at $43.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check CNA's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AFGD trades at $21.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AFGD's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AFGC trades at $18.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AFGC's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while KNSL trades at $444.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check KNSL's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AFGB trades at $21.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AFGB's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AFGE trades at $17.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AFGE's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AFG trades at $122.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AFG's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AXS-PE trades at $20.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AXS-PE's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AXS trades at $93.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AXS's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check ALL-PJ's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while THG trades at $168.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check THG's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while RLI trades at $65.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check RLI's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while ALL-PI trades at $19.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check ALL-PI's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while SIGI trades at $77.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check SIGI's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while WTM trades at $1,774.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 166.08. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check WTM's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while KMPB trades at $23.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check KMPB's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while KMPR trades at $60.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check KMPR's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while MCY trades at $68.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check MCY's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check HGTY-WT's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while PLMR trades at $129.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check PLMR's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AHL trades at $31.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AHL's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AHL-PD trades at $20.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -83.78. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AHL-PD's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while LMND trades at $36.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check LMND's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while SKWD trades at $49.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check SKWD's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AHL-PE trades at $20.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -84.44. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AHL-PE's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while ROOT trades at $116.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check ROOT's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while STC trades at $65.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check STC's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while HMN trades at $41.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check HMN's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while HCI trades at $138.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check HCI's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while MHLA trades at $15.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check MHLA's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while PRA trades at $23.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check PRA's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while ARGO trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check ARGO's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while SIGIP trades at $17.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check SIGIP's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while BOW trades at $31.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check BOW's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while SAFT trades at $69.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check SAFT's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 907.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while HGTY trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 47.62. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check HGTY's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 664.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while UFCS trades at $26.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check UFCS's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 651M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while HRTG trades at $21.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check HRTG's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 650.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while UVE trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check UVE's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 596M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while DGICA trades at $16.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check DGICA's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 552.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while DGICB trades at $14.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check DGICB's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 489.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while ACIC trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check ACIC's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while GBLI trades at $30.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check GBLI's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 361.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AII trades at $18.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AII's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while UIHC trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check UIHC's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 258.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while NODK trades at $12.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check NODK's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while KINS trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check KINS's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 215.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while CNFRZ trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check CNFRZ's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while CNFR trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check CNFR's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while UNAM trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check UNAM's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 90.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while HALL trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check HALL's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 329. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.22. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check ARGO-PA's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while MILE trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check MILE's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AFHBL's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while Y trades at $847.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check Y's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while STFC trades at $52.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check STFC's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while MILEW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check MILEW's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check AHL-PC's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while NSEC trades at $16.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check NSEC's competition here

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 52.7B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $199.77, while FNHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 9.40, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.Check FNHC's competition here