The Allstate Corporation

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 165.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while PGR trades at $282.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 115.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while CB trades at $287.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, TKOMF has a market cap of 79.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while TKOMF trades at $42.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TKOMF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TKOMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to TKOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, TKOMY has a market cap of 76.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while TKOMY trades at $39.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TKOMY's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TKOMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to TKOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, SMPNY has a market cap of 60.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while SMPNY trades at $15.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SMPNY's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMPNY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to SMPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 60.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while TRV trades at $267.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 52.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while ALL-PB trades at $25.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 52.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while ALL-PH trades at $20.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, PPCCY has a market cap of 45.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while PPCCY trades at $48.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PPCCY's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPCCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to PPCCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, IFCZF has a market cap of 39.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while IFCZF trades at $222.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas IFCZF's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IFCZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to IFCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, IFTPF has a market cap of 39.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while IFTPF trades at $20.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas IFTPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IFTPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to IFTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, PPCCF has a market cap of 38.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while PPCCF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PPCCF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPCCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to PPCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FAXXF has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FAXXF trades at $16.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FAXXF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FAXXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to FAXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FRFXF has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FRFXF trades at $16.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FRFXF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRFXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to FRFXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FRFFF has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FRFFF trades at $17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FRFFF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRFFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to FRFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, PINXY has a market cap of 37.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while PINXY trades at $9.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PINXY's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PINXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to PINXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, PINXF has a market cap of 37.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while PINXF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PINXF's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PINXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to PINXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FRFHF has a market cap of 36.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FRFHF trades at $1,591.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FRFHF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRFHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to FRFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, MSADF has a market cap of 35.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while MSADF trades at $23.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MSADF's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to MSADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, MSADY has a market cap of 34.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while MSADY trades at $22.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MSADY's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSADY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to MSADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 28.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while WRB-PH trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, NHOLF has a market cap of 28.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while NHOLF trades at $30.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NHOLF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NHOLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to NHOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 28.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while WRB-PE trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 28.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while WRB-PF trades at $19.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while WRB-PG trades at $16.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 27.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while WRB trades at $72.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 23.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while MKL trades at $1,868.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 22.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while CINF trades at $143.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, QBEIF has a market cap of 21.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while QBEIF trades at $14.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas QBEIF's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QBEIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to QBEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, QBIEY has a market cap of 20.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while QBIEY trades at $13.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas QBIEY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QBIEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to QBIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, INTAF has a market cap of 20.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while INTAF trades at $116.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas INTAF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INTAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to INTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FRFGF has a market cap of 20.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FRFGF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FRFGF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRFGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to FRFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 18.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while L trades at $86.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FXFLF has a market cap of 16.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FXFLF trades at $16.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FXFLF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FXFLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to FXFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, SNMYF has a market cap of 16.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while SNMYF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SNMYF's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNMYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to SNMYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, SNMCY has a market cap of 14.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while SNMCY trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SNMCY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNMCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to SNMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AMIGY has a market cap of 13.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AMIGY trades at $43.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AMIGY's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMIGY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AMIGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AMIGF has a market cap of 13.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AMIGF trades at $43.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AMIGF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMIGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AMIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while CNA trades at $48.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, IAUGY has a market cap of 12.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while IAUGY trades at $26.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas IAUGY's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IAUGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to IAUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, PZAKY has a market cap of 11.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while PZAKY trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PZAKY's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PZAKY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to PZAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFGC trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFGE trades at $16.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFGD trades at $20.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFG trades at $129.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFGB trades at $21.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 10.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while KNSL trades at $455.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, PWZYF has a market cap of 10.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while PWZYF trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PWZYF's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PWZYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to PWZYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, IAUGF has a market cap of 9.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while IAUGF trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas IAUGF's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IAUGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to IAUGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AXS trades at $99.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AXS-PE trades at $20.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, BZLYF has a market cap of 7.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while BZLYF trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas BZLYF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BZLYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to BZLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while RLI trades at $74.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while THG trades at $168.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, HCXLY has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while HCXLY trades at $31.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HCXLY's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCXLY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to HCXLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while SIGI trades at $85.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, HCXLF has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while HCXLF trades at $14.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HCXLF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCXLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to HCXLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while ALL-PI trades at $19.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while WTM trades at $1,784.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while PLMR trades at $155.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while KMPR trades at $61.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while KMPB trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, IFZZF has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while IFZZF trades at $20.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas IFZZF's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IFZZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to IFZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, QUCOF has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while QUCOF trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas QUCOF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QUCOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to QUCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, ZZHGF has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while ZZHGF trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ZZHGF's P/E ratio is -48.00. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZZHGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ZZHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, INFFF has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while INFFF trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas INFFF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INFFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to INFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while MCY trades at $58.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFSIC has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFSIC trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFSIC's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AFSIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFSIM has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFSIM trades at $14.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFSIM's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AFSIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFSIP has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFSIP trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFSIP's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AFSIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFSIN has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFSIN trades at $13.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFSIN's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AFSIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFSIB has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFSIB trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFSIB's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AFSIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFSIA has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFSIA trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFSIA's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AFSIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while ROOT trades at $143.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 84.98. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while LMND trades at $30.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while SKWD trades at $54.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while STC trades at $65.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, ZZHGY has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while ZZHGY trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ZZHGY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZZHGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ZZHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while HMN trades at $42.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while HCI trades at $148.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, LNDAF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while LNDAF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas LNDAF's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LNDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to LNDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while BOW trades at $41.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 32.02. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while MHLA trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, DIISY has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while DIISY trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas DIISY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DIISY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to DIISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while PRA trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while SAFT trades at $77.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AHL-PD trades at $18.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -77.74. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AHL-PE trades at $18.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -77.70. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while SIGIP trades at $18.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while ARGO trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 812.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while HGTY trades at $8.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 89.65. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 721.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while UVE trades at $25.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 718.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while UFCS trades at $28.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 698.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while DGICA trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 697.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while DGICB trades at $17.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 619.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while HRTG trades at $19.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 563.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while ACIC trades at $11.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 412.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while GBLI trades at $28.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FFHPF has a market cap of 396.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FFHPF trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FFHPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FFHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to FFHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FXFHF has a market cap of 387.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FXFHF trades at $17.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FXFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FXFHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to FXFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while UIHC trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UIHC's ROE of -54.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FAXRF has a market cap of 310.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FAXRF trades at $13.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FAXRF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FAXRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to FAXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 259.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while NODK trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 40.45. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 251.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while KINS trades at $18.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 233.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while CNFRZ trades at $19.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, EGFHF has a market cap of 44.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while EGFHF trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas EGFHF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EGFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to EGFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FIGP has a market cap of 21.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FIGP trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FIGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FIGP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to FIGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 9.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while CNFR trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430224.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while UNAM trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 94379.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while HALL trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, SGYI has a market cap of 6433.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while SGYI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SGYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGYI's ROE of +40.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to SGYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, MAJCQ has a market cap of 1879.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while MAJCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MAJCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MAJCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to MAJCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFHIF has a market cap of 1765.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFHIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFHIF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFHIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AFHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 326.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.05. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FNHCQ has a market cap of 18.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FNHCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FNHCQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNHCQ's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to FNHCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, MILEW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while MILEW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFHBL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, NSEC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while NSEC trades at $16.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AHL-PC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, Y comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while Y trades at $847.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, FNHC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while FNHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AHL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, STFC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while STFC trades at $52.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, SBBG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while SBBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SBBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to SBBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, AFHIQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while AFHIQ trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AFHIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFHIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to AFHIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.

ALL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL stands at 53.03B. In comparison, MILE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL is priced at $200.25, while MILE trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ALL's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL.