The Allstate Corporation
The Allstate Corporation (ALL-PI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ALL-PI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALL-PI | $19.32 | -0.26% | 5.1B | 1.61 | $12.04 | +1.97% |
| CB | $328.97 | -0.18% | 129.5B | 12.81 | $25.69 | +1.18% |
| PGR | $205.17 | -0.00% | 120.2B | 10.67 | $19.23 | +6.74% |
| TRV | $302.49 | +0.16% | 67.5B | 11.03 | $27.42 | +1.45% |
| ALL-PB | $26.13 | -0.08% | 54.5B | 2.17 | $12.04 | +1.97% |
| ALL | $206.17 | +0.56% | 53.5B | 5.42 | $38.05 | +1.97% |
| ALL-PH | $20.78 | -0.91% | 51.7B | 3.31 | $6.28 | +1.97% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.97% |
| WRB | $68.76 | +0.09% | 26.1B | 15.45 | $4.45 | +2.69% |
| CINF | $163.82 | -0.25% | 25.6B | 10.80 | $15.17 | +2.11% |
Stock Comparison
ALL-PI vs CB Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 129.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while CB trades at $328.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check CB's competition here
ALL-PI vs PGR Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 120.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while PGR trades at $205.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check PGR's competition here
ALL-PI vs TRV Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while TRV trades at $302.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check TRV's competition here
ALL-PI vs ALL-PB Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while ALL-PB trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check ALL-PB's competition here
ALL-PI vs ALL Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while ALL trades at $206.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check ALL's competition here
ALL-PI vs ALL-PH Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while ALL-PH trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check ALL-PH's competition here
ALL-PI vs ALL-PG Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check ALL-PG's competition here
ALL-PI vs WRB Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while WRB trades at $68.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check WRB's competition here
ALL-PI vs CINF Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while CINF trades at $163.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check CINF's competition here
ALL-PI vs MKL Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while MKL trades at $1,942.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check MKL's competition here
ALL-PI vs L Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while L trades at $108.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check L's competition here
ALL-PI vs CNA Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while CNA trades at $46.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check CNA's competition here
ALL-PI vs AFG Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AFG trades at $128.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check AFG's competition here
ALL-PI vs KNSL Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while KNSL trades at $362.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check KNSL's competition here
ALL-PI vs WRB-PE Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while WRB-PE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ALL-PI has daily volatility of 0.77 and WRB-PE has daily volatility of N/A.Check WRB-PE's competition here
ALL-PI vs AXS Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AXS trades at $100.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check AXS's competition here
ALL-PI vs AXS-PE Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AXS-PE trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check AXS-PE's competition here
ALL-PI vs WRB-PF Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while WRB-PF trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check WRB-PF's competition here
ALL-PI vs ALL-PJ Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
ALL-PI vs WRB-PG Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while WRB-PG trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check WRB-PG's competition here
ALL-PI vs THG Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while THG trades at $173.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check THG's competition here
ALL-PI vs WRB-PH Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while WRB-PH trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check WRB-PH's competition here
ALL-PI vs RLI Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while RLI trades at $61.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check RLI's competition here
ALL-PI vs WTM Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while WTM trades at $2,194.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check WTM's competition here
ALL-PI vs MCY Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while MCY trades at $88.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check MCY's competition here
ALL-PI vs SIGI Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while SIGI trades at $76.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check SIGI's competition here
ALL-PI vs LMND Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while LMND trades at $55.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check LMND's competition here
ALL-PI vs HGTY-WT Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
ALL-PI vs HGTY Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while HGTY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check HGTY's competition here
ALL-PI vs AHL Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check AHL's competition here
ALL-PI vs PLMR Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while PLMR trades at $120.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check PLMR's competition here
ALL-PI vs AHL-PD Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AHL-PD trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -84.44. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check AHL-PD's competition here
ALL-PI vs SLDE Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while SLDE trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check SLDE's competition here
ALL-PI vs HCI Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while HCI trades at $167.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check HCI's competition here
ALL-PI vs SKWD Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while SKWD trades at $45.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check SKWD's competition here
ALL-PI vs STC Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while STC trades at $64.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check STC's competition here
ALL-PI vs AHL-PE Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AHL-PE trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -84.36. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check AHL-PE's competition here
ALL-PI vs AFGB Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AFGB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ALL-PI has daily volatility of 0.77 and AFGB has daily volatility of N/A.Check AFGB's competition here
ALL-PI vs KMPR Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while KMPR trades at $29.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check KMPR's competition here
ALL-PI vs HMN Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while HMN trades at $42.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check HMN's competition here
ALL-PI vs AFGD Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AFGD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ALL-PI has daily volatility of 0.77 and AFGD has daily volatility of N/A.Check AFGD's competition here
ALL-PI vs AFGC Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AFGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ALL-PI has daily volatility of 0.77 and AFGC has daily volatility of N/A.Check AFGC's competition here
ALL-PI vs AFGE Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AFGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ALL-PI has daily volatility of 0.77 and AFGE has daily volatility of N/A.Check AFGE's competition here
ALL-PI vs KMPB Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while KMPB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ALL-PI has daily volatility of 0.77 and KMPB has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMPB's competition here
ALL-PI vs PRA Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while PRA trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check PRA's competition here
ALL-PI vs SAFT Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while SAFT trades at $73.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check SAFT's competition here
ALL-PI vs ARGO Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check ARGO's competition here
ALL-PI vs MHLA Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while MHLA trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check MHLA's competition here
ALL-PI vs SIGIP Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 994.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while SIGIP trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check SIGIP's competition here
ALL-PI vs UVE Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 961.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while UVE trades at $34.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check UVE's competition here
ALL-PI vs ASIC Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 949.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while ASIC trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check ASIC's competition here
ALL-PI vs UFCS Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 941M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while UFCS trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check UFCS's competition here
ALL-PI vs HRTG Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 872M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while HRTG trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check HRTG's competition here
ALL-PI vs BOW Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 739.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while BOW trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check BOW's competition here
ALL-PI vs DGICA Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 616.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while DGICA trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check DGICA's competition here
ALL-PI vs ROOT Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 601.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while ROOT trades at $43.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check ROOT's competition here
ALL-PI vs DGICB Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 558.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while DGICB trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check DGICB's competition here
ALL-PI vs ACIC Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 551.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while ACIC trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check ACIC's competition here
ALL-PI vs GBLI Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 415.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while GBLI trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check GBLI's competition here
ALL-PI vs AII Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AII trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check AII's competition here
ALL-PI vs UIHC Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check UIHC's competition here
ALL-PI vs NODK Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 272.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while NODK trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 120.27. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check NODK's competition here
ALL-PI vs PRHIZ Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 218.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while PRHIZ trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check PRHIZ's competition here
ALL-PI vs KINS Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 215M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while KINS trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check KINS's competition here
ALL-PI vs CNFR Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check CNFR's competition here
ALL-PI vs CNFRZ Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check CNFRZ's competition here
ALL-PI vs PRHI Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while PRHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ALL-PI has daily volatility of 0.77 and PRHI has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRHI's competition here
ALL-PI vs UNAM Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check UNAM's competition here
ALL-PI vs HALL Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 145.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while HALL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check HALL's competition here
ALL-PI vs ARGO-PA Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
ALL-PI vs STFC Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check STFC's competition here
ALL-PI vs AFHBL Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check AFHBL's competition here
ALL-PI vs MILEW Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check MILEW's competition here
ALL-PI vs GFZ Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check GFZ's competition here
ALL-PI vs AHL-PC Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check AHL-PC's competition here
ALL-PI vs FNHC Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check FNHC's competition here
ALL-PI vs MILE Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check MILE's competition here
ALL-PI vs NSEC Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check NSEC's competition here
ALL-PI vs Y Comparison March 2026
ALL-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PI stands at 5.1B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PI is priced at $19.32, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.61, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, ALL-PI's ROE is +0.39%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PI is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PI.Check Y's competition here