The Allstate Corporation
The Allstate Corporation ALL-PH Peers
See (ALL-PH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALL-PH | $20.46 | -0.08% | 54.2B | 3.37 | $6.07 | +1.82% |
| PGR | $277.30 | +0.10% | 162.6B | 18.70 | $14.83 | +1.77% |
| CB | $294.09 | +1.76% | 117.8B | 14.16 | $20.77 | +1.24% |
| TRV | $274.34 | +0.25% | 62.2B | 14.93 | $18.37 | +1.53% |
| ALL | $206.75 | +0.89% | 54.8B | 14.13 | $14.63 | +1.82% |
| ALL-PB | $25.77 | +0.16% | 54.4B | 2.14 | $12.04 | +1.82% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | N/A | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.82% |
| WRB-PE | $21.76 | +0.37% | 28.3B | 4.73 | $4.60 | +2.35% |
| WRB | $73.92 | +0.86% | 28B | 17.15 | $4.31 | +2.35% |
| WRB-PF | $19.26 | -0.04% | 27.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.35% |
Stock Comparison
ALL-PH vs PGR Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 162.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while PGR trades at $277.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs CB Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 117.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while CB trades at $294.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs TRV Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while TRV trades at $274.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs ALL Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while ALL trades at $206.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs ALL-PB Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while ALL-PB trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs ALL-PG Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs WRB-PE Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while WRB-PE trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs WRB Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while WRB trades at $73.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs WRB-PF Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while WRB-PF trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs WRB-PH Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while WRB-PH trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs WRB-PG Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while WRB-PG trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs MKL Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while MKL trades at $1,907.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs CINF Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while CINF trades at $149.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs L Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while L trades at $88.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs CNA Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while CNA trades at $47.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs KNSL Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while KNSL trades at $466.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AFGB Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AFGB trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AFGD Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AFGD trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AFGE Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AFGE trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AFG Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AFG trades at $122.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AFGC Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AFGC trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AXS Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AXS trades at $102.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AXS-PE Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AXS-PE trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs RLI Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while RLI trades at $76.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs ALL-PJ Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs THG Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while THG trades at $174.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs SIGI Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while SIGI trades at $87.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs ALL-PI Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while ALL-PI trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs WTM Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while WTM trades at $1,782.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 167.17. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs PLMR Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while PLMR trades at $163.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs KMPR Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while KMPR trades at $63.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs KMPB Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while KMPB trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs HGTY-WT Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs MCY Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while MCY trades at $63.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AHL Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AHL trades at $34.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs SKWD Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while SKWD trades at $61.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs LMND Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while LMND trades at $32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs ROOT Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while ROOT trades at $125.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs HCI Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while HCI trades at $162.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AHL-PE Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AHL-PE trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -79.43. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs HMN Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while HMN trades at $43.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs STC Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while STC trades at $60.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs MHLA Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while MHLA trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs SAFT Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while SAFT trades at $82.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs BOW Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while BOW trades at $37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs PRA Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while PRA trades at $23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AHL-PD Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AHL-PD trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -79.59. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs ARGO Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs SIGIP Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while SIGIP trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs HGTY Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 881.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while HGTY trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 46.26. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs UVE Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 757.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while UVE trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs HRTG Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 735.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while HRTG trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs UFCS Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 730.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while UFCS trades at $28.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs DGICB Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 710.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while DGICB trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs DGICA Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 708.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while DGICA trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs ACIC Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while ACIC trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs GBLI Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 433.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while GBLI trades at $30.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs UIHC Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AII Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AII trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs NODK Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 273.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while NODK trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 45.59. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs CNFRZ Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 225.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while CNFRZ trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs KINS Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 224.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while KINS trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs CNFR Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while CNFR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs UNAM Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs HALL Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 102.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while HALL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs ARGO-PA Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 329. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs FNHC Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs MILEW Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs NSEC Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs MILE Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AFHBL Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs AHL-PC Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs STFC Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.
ALL-PH vs Y Comparison
ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 54.2B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.46, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.37, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.