The Allstate Corporation

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 165.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while PGR trades at $282.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 115.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while CB trades at $287.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, TKOMF has a market cap of 79.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while TKOMF trades at $42.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas TKOMF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TKOMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to TKOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, TKOMY has a market cap of 76.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while TKOMY trades at $39.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas TKOMY's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TKOMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to TKOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, SMPNY has a market cap of 60.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while SMPNY trades at $15.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas SMPNY's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMPNY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to SMPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 60.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while TRV trades at $267.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 53.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while ALL trades at $200.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 52.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while ALL-PB trades at $25.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, PPCCY has a market cap of 45.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while PPCCY trades at $48.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas PPCCY's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPCCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to PPCCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, IFCZF has a market cap of 39.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while IFCZF trades at $222.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas IFCZF's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IFCZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to IFCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, IFTPF has a market cap of 39.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while IFTPF trades at $20.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas IFTPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IFTPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to IFTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, PPCCF has a market cap of 38.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while PPCCF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas PPCCF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PPCCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to PPCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FAXXF has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FAXXF trades at $16.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FAXXF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FAXXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to FAXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FRFXF has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FRFXF trades at $16.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FRFXF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRFXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to FRFXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FRFFF has a market cap of 38.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FRFFF trades at $17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FRFFF's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRFFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to FRFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, PINXY has a market cap of 37.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while PINXY trades at $9.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas PINXY's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PINXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to PINXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, PINXF has a market cap of 37.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while PINXF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas PINXF's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PINXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to PINXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FRFHF has a market cap of 36.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FRFHF trades at $1,591.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FRFHF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRFHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to FRFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, MSADF has a market cap of 35.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while MSADF trades at $23.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas MSADF's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to MSADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, MSADY has a market cap of 34.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while MSADY trades at $22.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas MSADY's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSADY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to MSADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 28.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while WRB-PH trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, NHOLF has a market cap of 28.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while NHOLF trades at $30.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas NHOLF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NHOLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to NHOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 28.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while WRB-PE trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 28.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while WRB-PF trades at $19.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while WRB-PG trades at $16.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 27.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while WRB trades at $72.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 23.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while MKL trades at $1,868.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 22.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while CINF trades at $143.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, QBEIF has a market cap of 21.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while QBEIF trades at $14.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas QBEIF's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QBEIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to QBEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, QBIEY has a market cap of 20.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while QBIEY trades at $13.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas QBIEY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QBIEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to QBIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, INTAF has a market cap of 20.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while INTAF trades at $116.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas INTAF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INTAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to INTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FRFGF has a market cap of 20.04B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FRFGF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FRFGF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRFGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to FRFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 18.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while L trades at $86.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FXFLF has a market cap of 16.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FXFLF trades at $16.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FXFLF's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FXFLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to FXFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, SNMYF has a market cap of 16.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while SNMYF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas SNMYF's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNMYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to SNMYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, SNMCY has a market cap of 14.15B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while SNMCY trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas SNMCY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNMCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to SNMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AMIGY has a market cap of 13.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AMIGY trades at $43.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AMIGY's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMIGY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AMIGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AMIGF has a market cap of 13.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AMIGF trades at $43.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AMIGF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMIGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AMIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while CNA trades at $48.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, IAUGY has a market cap of 12.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while IAUGY trades at $26.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas IAUGY's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IAUGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to IAUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, PZAKY has a market cap of 11.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while PZAKY trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas PZAKY's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PZAKY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to PZAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFGC trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFGE trades at $16.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFGD trades at $20.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFG trades at $129.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFGB trades at $21.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 10.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while KNSL trades at $455.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, PWZYF has a market cap of 10.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while PWZYF trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas PWZYF's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PWZYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to PWZYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, IAUGF has a market cap of 9.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while IAUGF trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas IAUGF's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IAUGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to IAUGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AXS trades at $99.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AXS-PE trades at $20.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, BZLYF has a market cap of 7.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while BZLYF trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas BZLYF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BZLYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to BZLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while RLI trades at $74.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while THG trades at $168.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, HCXLY has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while HCXLY trades at $31.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas HCXLY's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCXLY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to HCXLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while SIGI trades at $85.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, HCXLF has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while HCXLF trades at $14.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas HCXLF's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCXLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to HCXLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while ALL-PI trades at $19.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while WTM trades at $1,784.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while PLMR trades at $155.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while KMPR trades at $61.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while KMPB trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, IFZZF has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while IFZZF trades at $20.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas IFZZF's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IFZZF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to IFZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, QUCOF has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while QUCOF trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas QUCOF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QUCOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to QUCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, ZZHGF has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while ZZHGF trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas ZZHGF's P/E ratio is -48.00. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZZHGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ZZHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, INFFF has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while INFFF trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas INFFF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INFFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to INFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while MCY trades at $58.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFSIC has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFSIC trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFSIC's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFSIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFSIM has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFSIM trades at $14.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFSIM's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AFSIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFSIP has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFSIP trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFSIP's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AFSIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFSIN has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFSIN trades at $13.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFSIN's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFSIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFSIB has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFSIB trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFSIB's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFSIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFSIA has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFSIA trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFSIA's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFSIA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AFSIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while ROOT trades at $143.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 84.98. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while LMND trades at $30.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while SKWD trades at $54.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while STC trades at $65.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, ZZHGY has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while ZZHGY trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas ZZHGY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZZHGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ZZHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while HMN trades at $42.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while HCI trades at $148.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, LNDAF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while LNDAF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas LNDAF's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LNDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to LNDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while BOW trades at $41.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 32.02. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while MHLA trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, DIISY has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while DIISY trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas DIISY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DIISY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to DIISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while PRA trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while SAFT trades at $77.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AHL-PD trades at $18.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -77.74. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AHL-PE trades at $18.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -77.70. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while SIGIP trades at $18.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while ARGO trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 812.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while HGTY trades at $8.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 89.65. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 721.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while UVE trades at $25.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 718.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while UFCS trades at $28.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 698.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while DGICA trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 697.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while DGICB trades at $17.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 619.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while HRTG trades at $19.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 563.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while ACIC trades at $11.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 412.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while GBLI trades at $28.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FFHPF has a market cap of 396.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FFHPF trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FFHPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FFHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to FFHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FXFHF has a market cap of 387.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FXFHF trades at $17.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FXFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FXFHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to FXFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while UIHC trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UIHC's ROE of -54.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FAXRF has a market cap of 310.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FAXRF trades at $13.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FAXRF's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FAXRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to FAXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 259.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while NODK trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 40.45. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 251.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while KINS trades at $18.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 233.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while CNFRZ trades at $19.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, EGFHF has a market cap of 44.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while EGFHF trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas EGFHF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EGFHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to EGFHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FIGP has a market cap of 21.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FIGP trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FIGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FIGP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to FIGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 9.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while CNFR trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430224.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while UNAM trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 94379.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while HALL trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, SGYI has a market cap of 6433.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while SGYI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas SGYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGYI's ROE of +40.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to SGYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, MAJCQ has a market cap of 1879.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while MAJCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas MAJCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MAJCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to MAJCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFHIF has a market cap of 1765.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFHIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFHIF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFHIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 326.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.05. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FNHCQ has a market cap of 18.00. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FNHCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FNHCQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNHCQ's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to FNHCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, MILEW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while MILEW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFHBL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, NSEC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while NSEC trades at $16.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AHL-PC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, Y comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while Y trades at $847.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, FNHC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while FNHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AHL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, STFC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while STFC trades at $52.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, SBBG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while SBBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas SBBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to SBBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, AFHIQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while AFHIQ trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas AFHIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFHIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to AFHIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.

ALL-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALL-PH stands at 52.51B. In comparison, MILE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ALL-PH is priced at $20.36, while MILE trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALL-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.34, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ALL-PH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALL-PH is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALL-PH.