Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited (AHL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AHL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHL | $32.80 | -3.66% | 3B | 5.41 | $6.06 | N/A |
| PGR | $244.09 | -2.05% | 143.1B | 13.76 | $17.74 | +2.01% |
| CB | $274.41 | -1.18% | 109.4B | 12.11 | $22.66 | +1.35% |
| TRV | $272.34 | -1.43% | 61.3B | 12.04 | $22.60 | +1.56% |
| ALL-PH | $22.08 | -0.18% | 54.9B | 3.37 | $6.56 | +1.90% |
| ALL-PB | $26.16 | -0.30% | 54.5B | 2.17 | $12.04 | +1.90% |
| ALL | $202.08 | -1.67% | 53.2B | 9.51 | $21.25 | +1.90% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.90% |
| WRB-PH | $17.72 | -0.95% | 28B | N/A | N/A | +2.22% |
| WRB-PG | $17.56 | +0.00% | 27.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.22% |
Stock Comparison
AHL vs PGR Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 143.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while PGR trades at $244.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check PGR's competition here
AHL vs CB Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while CB trades at $274.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check CB's competition here
AHL vs TRV Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while TRV trades at $272.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check TRV's competition here
AHL vs ALL-PH Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while ALL-PH trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check ALL-PH's competition here
AHL vs ALL-PB Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while ALL-PB trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check ALL-PB's competition here
AHL vs ALL Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while ALL trades at $202.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check ALL's competition here
AHL vs ALL-PG Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check ALL-PG's competition here
AHL vs WRB-PH Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while WRB-PH trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check WRB-PH's competition here
AHL vs WRB-PG Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while WRB-PG trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check WRB-PG's competition here
AHL vs WRB-PE Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while WRB-PE trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check WRB-PE's competition here
AHL vs WRB-PF Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while WRB-PF trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check WRB-PF's competition here
AHL vs WRB Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while WRB trades at $71.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check WRB's competition here
AHL vs MKL Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while MKL trades at $1,978.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check MKL's competition here
AHL vs CINF Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while CINF trades at $153.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check CINF's competition here
AHL vs L Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while L trades at $95.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas L's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check L's competition here
AHL vs CNA Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while CNA trades at $48.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check CNA's competition here
AHL vs AFGB Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AFGB trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AFGB's competition here
AHL vs AFGE Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AFGE trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AFGE's competition here
AHL vs AFGC Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AFGC trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AFGC's competition here
AHL vs AFGD Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AFGD trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AFGD's competition here
AHL vs AFG Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AFG trades at $133.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AFG's competition here
AHL vs KNSL Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while KNSL trades at $449.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check KNSL's competition here
AHL vs AXS-PE Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AXS-PE trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AXS-PE's competition here
AHL vs AXS Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AXS trades at $98.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AXS's competition here
AHL vs ALL-PJ Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while ALL-PJ trades at $27.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
AHL vs RLI Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while RLI trades at $67.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check RLI's competition here
AHL vs THG Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while THG trades at $173.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check THG's competition here
AHL vs ALL-PI Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while ALL-PI trades at $20.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check ALL-PI's competition here
AHL vs SIGI Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while SIGI trades at $77.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check SIGI's competition here
AHL vs WTM Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while WTM trades at $1,828.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check WTM's competition here
AHL vs MCY Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while MCY trades at $76.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check MCY's competition here
AHL vs LMND Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while LMND trades at $53.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -18.87. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check LMND's competition here
AHL vs HGTY Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while HGTY trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 54.20. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check HGTY's competition here
AHL vs HGTY-WT Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
AHL vs KMPB Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while KMPB trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check KMPB's competition here
AHL vs KMPR Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while KMPR trades at $52.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check KMPR's competition here
AHL vs PLMR Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while PLMR trades at $122.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check PLMR's competition here
AHL vs AHL-PD Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AHL-PD trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -85.64. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AHL-PD's competition here
AHL vs HCI Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while HCI trades at $163.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check HCI's competition here
AHL vs STC Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while STC trades at $73.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check STC's competition here
AHL vs SKWD Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while SKWD trades at $48.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check SKWD's competition here
AHL vs AHL-PE Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AHL-PE trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -85.80. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AHL-PE's competition here
AHL vs HMN Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while HMN trades at $45.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check HMN's competition here
AHL vs MHLA Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while MHLA trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check MHLA's competition here
AHL vs PRA Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while PRA trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check PRA's competition here
AHL vs ROOT Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while ROOT trades at $87.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check ROOT's competition here
AHL vs SIGIP Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while SIGIP trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check SIGIP's competition here
AHL vs SAFT Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while SAFT trades at $73.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check SAFT's competition here
AHL vs ARGO Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check ARGO's competition here
AHL vs BOW Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while BOW trades at $30.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check BOW's competition here
AHL vs UFCS Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 796.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while UFCS trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check UFCS's competition here
AHL vs UVE Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 691.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while UVE trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check UVE's competition here
AHL vs HRTG Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 674.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while HRTG trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check HRTG's competition here
AHL vs DGICB Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 629M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while DGICB trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check DGICB's competition here
AHL vs DGICA Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 620.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while DGICA trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check DGICA's competition here
AHL vs ACIC Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 512M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while ACIC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check ACIC's competition here
AHL vs GBLI Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 418.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while GBLI trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check GBLI's competition here
AHL vs AII Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 385.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AII trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AII's competition here
AHL vs UIHC Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check UIHC's competition here
AHL vs NODK Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 259.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while NODK trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check NODK's competition here
AHL vs CNFRZ Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while CNFRZ trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check CNFRZ's competition here
AHL vs KINS Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while KINS trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check KINS's competition here
AHL vs CNFR Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while CNFR trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check CNFR's competition here
AHL vs UNAM Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check UNAM's competition here
AHL vs HALL Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 97.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while HALL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check HALL's competition here
AHL vs ARGO-PA Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 330. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.31. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
AHL vs FNHC Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check FNHC's competition here
AHL vs Y Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check Y's competition here
AHL vs STFC Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check STFC's competition here
AHL vs AFHBL Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AFHBL's competition here
AHL vs NSEC Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check NSEC's competition here
AHL vs MILE Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check MILE's competition here
AHL vs AHL-PC Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check AHL-PC's competition here
AHL vs MILEW Comparison August 2025
AHL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHL stands at 3B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHL is priced at $32.80, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.41, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHL's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AHL is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHL.Check MILEW's competition here