American Financial Group, Inc.
American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AFGC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFGC | $19.83 | +1.38% | 11.2B | N/A | N/A | +6.47% |
| PGR | $249.21 | +0.10% | 146.1B | 14.04 | $17.75 | +1.97% |
| CB | $277.69 | -0.41% | 110.7B | 12.26 | $22.65 | +1.33% |
| TRV | $276.29 | +0.50% | 62.2B | 12.23 | $22.60 | +1.54% |
| ALL-PH | $22.12 | +0.73% | 55.1B | 3.40 | $6.51 | +1.87% |
| ALL-PB | $26.24 | +0.19% | 54.7B | 2.18 | $12.04 | +1.87% |
| ALL | $205.52 | -0.50% | 54.1B | 9.67 | $21.25 | +1.87% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.87% |
| WRB-PH | $17.89 | +3.29% | 27.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.19% |
| WRB-PG | $17.56 | +1.62% | 27.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.19% |
Stock Comparison
AFGC vs PGR Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 146.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while PGR trades at $249.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check PGR's competition here
AFGC vs CB Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 110.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while CB trades at $277.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check CB's competition here
AFGC vs TRV Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while TRV trades at $276.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check TRV's competition here
AFGC vs ALL-PH Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while ALL-PH trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check ALL-PH's competition here
AFGC vs ALL-PB Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while ALL-PB trades at $26.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check ALL-PB's competition here
AFGC vs ALL Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while ALL trades at $205.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check ALL's competition here
AFGC vs ALL-PG Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check ALL-PG's competition here
AFGC vs WRB-PH Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while WRB-PH trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check WRB-PH's competition here
AFGC vs WRB-PG Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while WRB-PG trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check WRB-PG's competition here
AFGC vs WRB Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while WRB trades at $72.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check WRB's competition here
AFGC vs WRB-PF Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while WRB-PF trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check WRB-PF's competition here
AFGC vs WRB-PE Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while WRB-PE trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check WRB-PE's competition here
AFGC vs MKL Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while MKL trades at $1,992.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check MKL's competition here
AFGC vs CINF Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while CINF trades at $155.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check CINF's competition here
AFGC vs L Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while L trades at $96.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas L's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check L's competition here
AFGC vs CNA Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while CNA trades at $49.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check CNA's competition here
AFGC vs AFGB Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AFGB trades at $22.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AFGB's competition here
AFGC vs AFGE Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AFGE trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AFGE's competition here
AFGC vs AFGD Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AFGD trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AFGD's competition here
AFGC vs AFG Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AFG trades at $134.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AFG's competition here
AFGC vs KNSL Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while KNSL trades at $455.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check KNSL's competition here
AFGC vs AXS Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AXS trades at $99.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AXS's competition here
AFGC vs AXS-PE Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AXS-PE trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AXS-PE's competition here
AFGC vs ALL-PJ Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while ALL-PJ trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
AFGC vs RLI Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while RLI trades at $68.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check RLI's competition here
AFGC vs THG Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while THG trades at $175.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check THG's competition here
AFGC vs ALL-PI Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while ALL-PI trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check ALL-PI's competition here
AFGC vs WTM Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while WTM trades at $1,863.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check WTM's competition here
AFGC vs SIGI Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while SIGI trades at $78.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check SIGI's competition here
AFGC vs MCY Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while MCY trades at $76.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check MCY's competition here
AFGC vs LMND Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while LMND trades at $56.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -20.13. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check LMND's competition here
AFGC vs HGTY Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while HGTY trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 54.65. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check HGTY's competition here
AFGC vs HGTY-WT Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
AFGC vs KMPR Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while KMPR trades at $53.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check KMPR's competition here
AFGC vs PLMR Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while PLMR trades at $125.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check PLMR's competition here
AFGC vs KMPB Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while KMPB trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check KMPB's competition here
AFGC vs AHL Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AHL trades at $34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AHL's competition here
AFGC vs AHL-PD Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AHL-PD trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -86.42. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AHL-PD's competition here
AFGC vs HCI Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while HCI trades at $165.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check HCI's competition here
AFGC vs STC Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while STC trades at $73.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check STC's competition here
AFGC vs SKWD Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while SKWD trades at $49.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check SKWD's competition here
AFGC vs AHL-PE Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AHL-PE trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -86.30. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AHL-PE's competition here
AFGC vs HMN Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while HMN trades at $45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check HMN's competition here
AFGC vs MHLA Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while MHLA trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check MHLA's competition here
AFGC vs ROOT Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while ROOT trades at $91.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check ROOT's competition here
AFGC vs PRA Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while PRA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check PRA's competition here
AFGC vs SAFT Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while SAFT trades at $75.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check SAFT's competition here
AFGC vs SIGIP Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while SIGIP trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check SIGIP's competition here
AFGC vs ARGO Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check ARGO's competition here
AFGC vs BOW Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while BOW trades at $31.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check BOW's competition here
AFGC vs UFCS Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while UFCS trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check UFCS's competition here
AFGC vs HRTG Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 701.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while HRTG trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check HRTG's competition here
AFGC vs UVE Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 697.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while UVE trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check UVE's competition here
AFGC vs DGICB Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 656.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while DGICB trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check DGICB's competition here
AFGC vs DGICA Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 622.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while DGICA trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check DGICA's competition here
AFGC vs ACIC Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 529.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while ACIC trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check ACIC's competition here
AFGC vs GBLI Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 423.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while GBLI trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check GBLI's competition here
AFGC vs AII Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 358.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AII trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AII's competition here
AFGC vs UIHC Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check UIHC's competition here
AFGC vs NODK Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 265.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while NODK trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check NODK's competition here
AFGC vs CNFRZ Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 239M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while CNFRZ trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check CNFRZ's competition here
AFGC vs KINS Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 196M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while KINS trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check KINS's competition here
AFGC vs CNFR Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while CNFR trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check CNFR's competition here
AFGC vs UNAM Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check UNAM's competition here
AFGC vs HALL Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 97.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while HALL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check HALL's competition here
AFGC vs ARGO-PA Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 330. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.31. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
AFGC vs MILE Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check MILE's competition here
AFGC vs AHL-PC Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AHL-PC's competition here
AFGC vs FNHC Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check FNHC's competition here
AFGC vs Y Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check Y's competition here
AFGC vs NSEC Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check NSEC's competition here
AFGC vs AFHBL Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check AFHBL's competition here
AFGC vs MILEW Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check MILEW's competition here
AFGC vs STFC Comparison August 2025
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 11.2B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $19.83, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.Check STFC's competition here