American Financial Group, Inc.
American Financial Group, Inc. AFGC Peers
See (AFGC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFGC | $18.95 | +0.72% | 10.45B | N/A | N/A | +7.19% |
| PGR | $285.98 | +1.72% | 167.65B | 19.30 | $14.82 | +1.72% |
| CB | $294.38 | +0.80% | 117.97B | 14.18 | $20.76 | +1.24% |
| TRV | $273.60 | +1.00% | 61.99B | 14.89 | $18.37 | +1.53% |
| ALL | $209.05 | +1.84% | 55.36B | 14.28 | $14.64 | +1.80% |
| ALL-PH | $20.82 | +0.39% | 54.86B | 3.39 | $6.15 | +1.80% |
| ALL-PB | $25.66 | -0.19% | 54.42B | 2.13 | $12.04 | +1.80% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | N/A | 32.10B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.80% |
| WRB | $73.29 | +0.81% | 27.80B | 17.00 | $4.31 | +2.36% |
| WRB-PF | $19.41 | +0.73% | 27.14B | N/A | N/A | +2.36% |
Stock Comparison
AFGC vs PGR Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 167.65B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while PGR trades at $285.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs CB Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 117.97B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while CB trades at $294.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs TRV Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 61.99B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while TRV trades at $273.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs ALL Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 55.36B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while ALL trades at $209.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs ALL-PH Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 54.86B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while ALL-PH trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs ALL-PB Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54.42B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while ALL-PB trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs ALL-PG Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs WRB Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 27.80B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while WRB trades at $73.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs WRB-PF Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 27.14B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while WRB-PF trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs WRB-PE Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 27.05B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while WRB-PE trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs WRB-PH Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 26.98B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while WRB-PH trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs WRB-PG Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 26.97B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while WRB-PG trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs MKL Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 24.34B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while MKL trades at $1,918.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs CINF Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 23.58B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while CINF trades at $150.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs L Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 18.75B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while L trades at $89.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas L's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs CNA Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 13.28B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while CNA trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs KNSL Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 10.79B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while KNSL trades at $462.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs AFG Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.58B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while AFG trades at $126.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs AFGE Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.40B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while AFGE trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs AFGB Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while AFGB trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs AFGD Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.23B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while AFGD trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs AXS Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 8.07B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while AXS trades at $102.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs AXS-PE Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.77B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while AXS-PE trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs ALL-PJ Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs RLI Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while RLI trades at $75.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs THG Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while THG trades at $168.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs SIGI Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while SIGI trades at $85.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs ALL-PI Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while ALL-PI trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs WTM Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while WTM trades at $1,806.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs PLMR Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while PLMR trades at $159.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs KMPR Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while KMPR trades at $64.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs KMPB Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while KMPB trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs HGTY-WT Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs MCY Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while MCY trades at $61.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs LMND Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while LMND trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs ROOT Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while ROOT trades at $135.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs SKWD Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while SKWD trades at $54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs HCI Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while HCI trades at $166.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs STC Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while STC trades at $66.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs AHL-PE Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while AHL-PE trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -80.41. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs HMN Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while HMN trades at $43.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs MHLA Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while MHLA trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs BOW Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while BOW trades at $38.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs SAFT Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while SAFT trades at $83.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs PRA Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while PRA trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs AHL-PD Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while AHL-PD trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -80.04. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs SIGIP Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while SIGIP trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs ARGO Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs HGTY Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 879.49M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while HGTY trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 46.17. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs HRTG Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 758.10M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while HRTG trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs UVE Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 743.86M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while UVE trades at $26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs UFCS Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 728.40M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while UFCS trades at $28.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs DGICA Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 724.74M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while DGICA trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs DGICB Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 706.81M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while DGICB trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs ACIC Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 534.79M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while ACIC trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs GBLI Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 443.66M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while GBLI trades at $31.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs UIHC Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.27M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs AII Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 322.51M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while AII trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs NODK Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 262.67M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while NODK trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 43.76. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs KINS Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 237.82M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while KINS trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs CNFRZ Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 226.12M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while CNFRZ trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs CNFR Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 10.05M. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while CNFR trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs UNAM Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430224.00. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs HALL Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 95834.00. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while HALL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs AHL Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 918.00. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while AHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.
AFGC vs ARGO-PA Comparison
AFGC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFGC stands at 10.45B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 328.00. Regarding current trading prices, AFGC is priced at $18.95, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFGC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.17. In terms of profitability, AFGC's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFGC is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFGC.