Aclarion, Inc.
Aclarion, Inc. ACONW Peers
See (ACONW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Healthcare Information Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACONW | $0.04 | +0.00% | 18.6K | N/A | -$6.58 | N/A |
| VEEV | $287.98 | +0.00% | 46.3B | 60.23 | $4.70 | N/A |
| GEHC | $74.07 | +0.00% | 34.8B | 15.96 | $4.76 | +0.17% |
| GEHCV | $56.00 | -4.08% | 25.5B | N/A | N/A | +0.17% |
| DOCS | $61.34 | +0.00% | 11B | 52.60 | $1.11 | N/A |
| SGFY | $30.49 | +0.07% | 8.9B | 70.91 | $0.43 | N/A |
| HQY | $104.76 | +0.00% | 8.9B | 75.10 | $1.37 | N/A |
| RCM | $14.31 | N/A | 6B | -102.21 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| BTSGU | $82.55 | +0.00% | 4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BTSG | $23.59 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 82.48 | $0.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ACONW vs VEEV Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while VEEV trades at $287.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 60.23. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs GEHC Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, GEHC has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while GEHC trades at $74.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEHC's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to GEHC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to GEHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs GEHCV Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, GEHCV has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while GEHCV trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEHCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to GEHCV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to GEHCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs DOCS Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, DOCS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while DOCS trades at $61.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCS's P/E ratio is 52.60. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to DOCS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to DOCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SGFY Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SGFY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SGFY trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGFY's P/E ratio is 70.91. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SGFY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to SGFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs HQY Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, HQY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while HQY trades at $104.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HQY's P/E ratio is 75.10. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to HQY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to HQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs RCM Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, RCM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while RCM trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCM's P/E ratio is -102.21. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to RCM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to RCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs BTSGU Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, BTSGU has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while BTSGU trades at $82.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTSGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to BTSGU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to BTSGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs BTSG Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, BTSG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while BTSG trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTSG's P/E ratio is 82.48. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to BTSG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to BTSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs ONEM Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, ONEM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while ONEM trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEM's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to ONEM's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to ONEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs PRVA Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, PRVA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while PRVA trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRVA's P/E ratio is 187.83. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to PRVA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to PRVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs WGS Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, WGS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while WGS trades at $92.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGS's P/E ratio is -65.03. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to WGS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to WGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs PGNY Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, PGNY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while PGNY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGNY's P/E ratio is 38.70. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to PGNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to PGNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs CERT Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, CERT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while CERT trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CERT's P/E ratio is -576.00. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to CERT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to CERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs PINC Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, PINC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while PINC trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINC's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to PINC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to PINC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs GDRX Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, GDRX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while GDRX trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDRX's P/E ratio is 70.86. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to GDRX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to GDRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs PHR Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, PHR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while PHR trades at $28.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHR's P/E ratio is -38.51. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to PHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to PHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs NXGN Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, NXGN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while NXGN trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXGN's P/E ratio is -266.00. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to NXGN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to NXGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SDGR Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SDGR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SDGR trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDGR's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SDGR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SDGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs TXG Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, TXG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while TXG trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXG's P/E ratio is -9.28. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to TXG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to TXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs TDOC Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, TDOC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while TDOC trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDOC's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to TDOC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to TDOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs OMCL Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, OMCL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while OMCL trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMCL's P/E ratio is 65.07. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to OMCL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to OMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs EVH Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, EVH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while EVH trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVH's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to EVH's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to EVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs AGTI Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, AGTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while AGTI trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGTI's P/E ratio is -71.79. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to AGTI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to AGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs HSTM Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, HSTM has a market cap of 846.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while HSTM trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSTM's P/E ratio is 44.02. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to HSTM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to HSTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs NUTX Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, NUTX has a market cap of 732.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while NUTX trades at $124.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUTX's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to NUTX's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to NUTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs CTEV Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, CTEV has a market cap of 720.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while CTEV trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTEV's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to CTEV's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to CTEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs MPLN-WT Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, MPLN-WT has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while MPLN-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to MPLN-WT's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to MPLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs ACCD Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, ACCD has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while ACCD trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACCD's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to ACCD's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to ACCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SHCR Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SHCR has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SHCR trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHCR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SHCR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SHCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs DH Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, DH has a market cap of 434.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while DH trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DH's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to DH's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to DH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SLGC Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SLGC has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SLGC trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGC's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SLGC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SLGCW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SLGCW has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SLGCW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGCW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SLGCW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SLGCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs NRC Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, NRC has a market cap of 379.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while NRC trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRC's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to NRC's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to NRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs MPLN Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, MPLN has a market cap of 375M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while MPLN trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPLN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to MPLN's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to MPLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SPOK Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SPOK has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SPOK trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPOK's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SPOK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SPOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SY Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SY has a market cap of 369.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SY trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SY's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SLP Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SLP has a market cap of 368.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SLP trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLP's P/E ratio is 50.89. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SLP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs TBRG Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, TBRG has a market cap of 352.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while TBRG trades at $23.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBRG's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to TBRG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to TBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs TRHC Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, TRHC has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while TRHC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRHC's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to TRHC's ROE of +121.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to TRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs HCAT Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, HCAT has a market cap of 281.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while HCAT trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCAT's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to HCAT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to HCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs OPRX Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, OPRX has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while OPRX trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRX's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to OPRX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to OPRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SMFR Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SMFR has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SMFR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SMFR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SMFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SOPH Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SOPH has a market cap of 219.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SOPH trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOPH's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SOPH's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SOPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs AMWL Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, AMWL has a market cap of 133.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while AMWL trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMWL's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to AMWL's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to AMWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs CPSI Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, CPSI has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while CPSI trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSI's P/E ratio is -183.80. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to CPSI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to CPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs EUDA Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, EUDA has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while EUDA trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUDA's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to EUDA's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to EUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs AUGX Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, AUGX has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while AUGX trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUGX's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to AUGX's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to AUGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs CCLDO Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, CCLDO has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while CCLDO trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLDO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to CCLDO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to CCLDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs CCLD Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, CCLD has a market cap of 96.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while CCLD trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLD's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to CCLD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to CCLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs FORA Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, FORA has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while FORA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORA's P/E ratio is -16.42. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to FORA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to FORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs CCLDP Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, CCLDP has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while CCLDP trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to CCLDP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to CCLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs BEAT Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, BEAT has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while BEAT trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEAT's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to BEAT's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to BEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs BEATW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, BEATW has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while BEATW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEATW's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to BEATW's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to BEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SNCE Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SNCE has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SNCE trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNCE's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SNCE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs AKLI Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, AKLI has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while AKLI trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKLI's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to AKLI's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to AKLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SHLT Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SHLT has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SHLT trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHLT's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SHLT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to SHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SHCRW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SHCRW has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SHCRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHCRW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SHCRW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SHCRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs VSEEW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, VSEEW has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while VSEEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSEEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to VSEEW's ROE of -6.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to VSEEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs STRM Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, STRM has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while STRM trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRM's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to STRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to STRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs RNLX Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, RNLX has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while RNLX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNLX's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to RNLX's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to RNLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs LIFW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, LIFW has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while LIFW trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to LIFW's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to LIFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs VSEE Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, VSEE has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while VSEE trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSEE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to VSEE's ROE of -6.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to VSEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs ONMD Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, ONMD has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while ONMD trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONMD's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to ONMD's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to ONMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs SCNX Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, SCNX has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while SCNX trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCNX's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to SCNX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to SCNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs BFRGW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, BFRGW has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while BFRGW trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFRGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to BFRGW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to BFRGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs MGRX Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, MGRX has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while MGRX trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRX's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to MGRX's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to MGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs BFRG Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, BFRG has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while BFRG trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFRG's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to BFRG's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to BFRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs BBLN Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, BBLN has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while BBLN trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBLN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to BBLN's ROE of +4.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to BBLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs INOV Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, INOV has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while INOV trades at $32.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INOV's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to INOV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to INOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs HCTI Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, HCTI has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while HCTI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCTI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to HCTI's ROE of -23.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to HCTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs ETAO Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, ETAO has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while ETAO trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETAO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to ETAO's ROE of -13.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to ETAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs MSPR Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, MSPR has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while MSPR trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to MSPR's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to MSPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs HLTH Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, HLTH has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while HLTH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to HLTH's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to HLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs ZCMD Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, ZCMD has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while ZCMD trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCMD's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to ZCMD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to ZCMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs UPH Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, UPH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while UPH trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to UPH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to UPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs ACON Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, ACON has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while ACON trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACON's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to ACON's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to ACON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs PEARW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, PEARW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while PEARW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEARW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to PEARW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to PEARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs PEAR Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, PEAR has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while PEAR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEAR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to PEAR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to PEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs EUDAW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, EUDAW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while EUDAW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to EUDAW's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to EUDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs OTRK Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, OTRK has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while OTRK trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTRK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to OTRK's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to OTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs FOXO Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, FOXO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while FOXO trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOXO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to FOXO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to FOXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs WGSWW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, WGSWW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while WGSWW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to WGSWW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to WGSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs CMAX Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, CMAX has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while CMAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to CMAX's ROE of +30.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to CMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs WORX Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, WORX has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while WORX trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WORX's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to WORX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to WORX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs LIFWZ Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, LIFWZ has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while LIFWZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to LIFWZ's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to LIFWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs OTRKP Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, OTRKP has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while OTRKP trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTRKP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to OTRKP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to OTRKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs ICCT Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, ICCT has a market cap of 829.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while ICCT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to ICCT's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to ICCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs KERNW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, KERNW has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while KERNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KERNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to KERNW's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to KERNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs KERN Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, KERN has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while KERN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KERN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to KERN's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to KERN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs MSPRZ Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, MSPRZ has a market cap of 116.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while MSPRZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSPRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to MSPRZ's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to MSPRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs LIFWW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, LIFWW has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while LIFWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to LIFWW's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to LIFWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs CMAXW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, CMAXW has a market cap of 36.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while CMAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMAXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to CMAXW's ROE of +30.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to CMAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs MSPRW Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, MSPRW has a market cap of 7.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while MSPRW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to MSPRW's ROE of -3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to MSPRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs UTRS Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, UTRS has a market cap of 888. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while UTRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to UTRS's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to UTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs CSLT Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, CSLT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while CSLT trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSLT's P/E ratio is -37.27. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to CSLT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to CSLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs MTBCP Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, MTBCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while MTBCP trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to MTBCP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to MTBCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs CERN Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, CERN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while CERN trades at $94.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CERN's P/E ratio is 55.84. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to CERN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is more volatile compared to CERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.
ACONW vs MTBCO Comparison
ACONW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACONW stands at 18.6K. In comparison, MTBCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACONW is priced at $0.04, while MTBCO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACONW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTBCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACONW's ROE is -1.27%, compared to MTBCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACONW is less volatile compared to MTBCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACONW.