Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. AAWW Peers
See (AAWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAWW | $102.48 | +0.02% | 2.9B | 9.73 | $10.53 | N/A |
| DAL | $49.59 | +1.26% | 32.4B | 8.79 | $5.64 | +1.21% |
| UAL | $79.18 | +2.10% | 25.9B | 7.20 | $10.99 | N/A |
| LUV | $32.16 | +2.03% | 18.3B | 36.13 | $0.89 | +2.23% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $40.09 | +0.15% | 12.1B | 11.30 | $3.55 | +1.58% |
| PAC | $227.20 | +1.06% | 11.4B | 24.25 | $9.35 | +5.07% |
| ASR | $312.50 | -0.25% | 9.3B | 13.10 | $23.86 | +9.64% |
| JOBY-WT | $2.00 | +1.52% | 7.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JOBY | $9.44 | -0.42% | 7.5B | -11.25 | -$0.84 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AAWW vs DAL Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while DAL trades at $49.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs UAL Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while UAL trades at $79.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs LUV Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while LUV trades at $32.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs CEA Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs LTM Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while LTM trades at $40.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs PAC Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while PAC trades at $227.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs ASR Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ASR trades at $312.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs JOBY-WT Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while JOBY-WT trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs JOBY Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while JOBY trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs AAL Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while AAL trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs RYAAY Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while RYAAY trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs ALK Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ALK trades at $49.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs OMAB Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while OMAB trades at $104.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs CPA Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while CPA trades at $108.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs GOL Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs SKYW Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SKYW trades at $103.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs PBI-PB Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while PBI-PB trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs CAAP Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while CAAP trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs JBLU Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while JBLU trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs ATSG Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs ALGT Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ALGT trades at $55.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs HA Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HA's ROE of +18.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs UP Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 901.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while UP trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UP's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs ULCC Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 822.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ULCC trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ULCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs SNCY Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 631.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SNCY trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs VLRS Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 536.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while VLRS trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs BLDEW Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 342.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while BLDEW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs BLDE Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while BLDE trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -12.52. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLDE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs ASLE Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ASLE trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is -55.27. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASLE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs FLYX Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while FLYX trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs AZUL Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs FLYY Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 129M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while FLYY trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs MATH Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while MATH trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs SAVE Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAVE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs SRFM Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SRFM trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs MESA Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while MESA trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MESA's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs SOAR Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while SOAR trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOAR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs FLYX-WT Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs ZNH Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.
AAWW vs ASLEW Comparison
AAWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAWW stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAWW is priced at $102.48, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAWW currently has a P/E ratio of 9.73, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, AAWW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AAWW is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAWW.