Apple Inc.

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 168B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while SONY trades at $27.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to SONY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check SONY's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while FIS trades at $71.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 291.08. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check FIS's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while LPL trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check LPL's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while VZIO trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to VZIO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check VZIO's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while SONO trades at $12.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -21.58. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check SONO's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while HEAR trades at $17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check HEAR's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 317.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while TBCH trades at $15.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check TBCH's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 216.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while GPRO trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check GPRO's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 176.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while VUZI trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check VUZI's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while VOXX trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check VOXX's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while BWNB trades at $19.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check BWNB's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while BWSN trades at $21.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check BWSN's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 122.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while ZEPP trades at $34.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check ZEPP's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while UEIC trades at $5.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check UEIC's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while AXIL trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check AXIL's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while KOSS trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -68.50. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check KOSS's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while FOXX trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +8.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check FOXX's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while MSN trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check MSN's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while PXDT trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check PXDT's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while FEBO trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check FEBO's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while MICS trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to MICS's ROE of -5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check MICS's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while UTME trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check UTME's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while RIME trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to RIME's ROE of +41.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check RIME's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while WTO trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to WTO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check WTO's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while WLDSW trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check WLDSW's competition here

AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.5T. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $229.65, while WLDS trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.55%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check WLDS's competition here