Apple Inc.
Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AAPL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | $259.88 | +0.94% | 3.8T | 32.85 | $7.91 | +0.40% |
| SONY | $21.62 | +0.65% | 129B | 16.50 | $1.31 | +0.49% |
| NXT | $108.13 | +6.61% | 16.1B | 27.58 | $3.92 | N/A |
| LPL | $4.05 | +3.58% | 4.1B | 27.07 | $0.15 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $14.20 | -0.49% | 1.7B | -88.75 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| ZEPP | $18.74 | +3.65% | 268.4M | -4.68 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| TBCH | $13.33 | +2.93% | 264M | 14.98 | $0.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AAPL vs SONY Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while SONY trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check SONY's competition here
AAPL vs NXT Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while NXT trades at $108.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check NXT's competition here
AAPL vs LPL Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while LPL trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to LPL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check LPL's competition here
AAPL vs BWSN Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check BWSN's competition here
AAPL vs VZIO Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check VZIO's competition here
AAPL vs SONO Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while SONO trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -88.75. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check SONO's competition here
AAPL vs HEAR Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check HEAR's competition here
AAPL vs ZEPP Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while ZEPP trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check ZEPP's competition here
AAPL vs TBCH Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 264M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while TBCH trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check TBCH's competition here
AAPL vs VUZI Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 207.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while VUZI trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check VUZI's competition here
AAPL vs VOXX Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check VOXX's competition here
AAPL vs GPRO Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 127.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while GPRO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check GPRO's competition here
AAPL vs BWNB Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while BWNB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -15.43. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check BWNB's competition here
AAPL vs KOSS Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while KOSS trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -45.78. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check KOSS's competition here
AAPL vs FEBO Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while FEBO trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check FEBO's competition here
AAPL vs PXDT Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check PXDT's competition here
AAPL vs MSN Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while MSN trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check MSN's competition here
AAPL vs MICS Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to MICS's ROE of -13.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check MICS's competition here
AAPL vs UTME Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check UTME's competition here
AAPL vs RIME Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while RIME trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to RIME's ROE of -54.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check RIME's competition here
AAPL vs WTO Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while WTO trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to WTO's ROE of -5.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check WTO's competition here
AAPL vs WLDSW Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while WLDSW trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check WLDSW's competition here
AAPL vs WLDS Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 656.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while WLDS trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check WLDS's competition here
AAPL vs BOXL Comparison March 2026
AAPL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPL stands at 3.8T. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 600.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPL is priced at $259.88, while BOXL trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.85, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AAPL's ROE is +1.60%, compared to BOXL's ROE of +10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPL is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPL.Check BOXL's competition here