Turtle Beach Corporation
Turtle Beach Corporation (HEAR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HEAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| AAPL | $280.14 | +3.24% | 4.1T | 33.85 | $8.28 | +0.37% |
| SONY | $19.78 | -1.54% | 118.1B | 15.34 | $1.29 | +0.76% |
| NXT | $119.93 | +0.67% | 17.8B | 30.59 | $3.92 | N/A |
| LPL | $4.33 | +1.17% | 4.3B | 28.83 | $0.15 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $14.84 | +0.07% | 1.8B | -92.75 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| GPRO | $1.73 | +4.85% | 283.6M | -2.93 | -$0.59 | N/A |
| ZEPP | $18.43 | +5.50% | 265M | -7.23 | -$2.56 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HEAR vs AAPL Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 4.1T. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while AAPL trades at $280.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 33.85. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check AAPL's competition here
HEAR vs SONY Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 118.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while SONY trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check SONY's competition here
HEAR vs NXT Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while NXT trades at $119.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check NXT's competition here
HEAR vs LPL Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while LPL trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is 28.83. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check LPL's competition here
HEAR vs BWSN Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BWSN's competition here
HEAR vs VZIO Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VZIO's competition here
HEAR vs SONO Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while SONO trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -92.75. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check SONO's competition here
HEAR vs GPRO Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while GPRO trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check GPRO's competition here
HEAR vs ZEPP Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while ZEPP trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check ZEPP's competition here
HEAR vs VUZI Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VUZI trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VUZI's competition here
HEAR vs TBCH Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 222.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while TBCH trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check TBCH's competition here
HEAR vs VOXX Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VOXX's competition here
HEAR vs BWNB Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BWNB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BWNB's competition here
HEAR vs KOSS Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while KOSS trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -48.56. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check KOSS's competition here
HEAR vs FEBO Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while FEBO trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check FEBO's competition here
HEAR vs MSN Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while MSN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check MSN's competition here
HEAR vs PXDT Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check PXDT's competition here
HEAR vs MICS Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MICS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check MICS's competition here
HEAR vs UTME Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check UTME's competition here
HEAR vs RIME Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while RIME trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RIME's ROE of -6.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check RIME's competition here
HEAR vs BOXL Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BOXL trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -40.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BOXL's competition here
HEAR vs WTO Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 877.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WTO trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTO's ROE of -14.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WTO's competition here
HEAR vs WLDSW Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 772.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WLDSW trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WLDSW's competition here
HEAR vs WLDS Comparison May 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 330.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WLDS trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WLDS's competition here