Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDSW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WLDSW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLDSW | $12.60 | +0.00% | 3.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AAPL | $308.63 | +4.84% | 4.5T | 37.27 | $8.28 | +0.34% |
| SONY | $20.79 | +2.87% | 122.5B | 17.76 | $1.17 | +0.76% |
| LPL | $3.59 | -1.64% | 3.6B | -179.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| NN | $16.28 | -8.28% | 2.2B | -24.30 | -$0.67 | N/A |
| BWNB | $24.99 | +0.00% | 1.6B | -27.82 | -$0.90 | N/A |
| SONO | $13.62 | +1.64% | 1.6B | 19.46 | $0.70 | N/A |
| UMAC | $22.08 | -4.91% | 744M | -50.18 | -$0.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WLDSW vs AAPL Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while AAPL trades at $308.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 37.27. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check AAPL's competition here
WLDSW vs SONY Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 122.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while SONY trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check SONY's competition here
WLDSW vs LPL Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while LPL trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check LPL's competition here
WLDSW vs BWSN Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BWSN's competition here
WLDSW vs VZIO Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check VZIO's competition here
WLDSW vs NN Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while NN trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -24.30. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NN's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check NN's competition here
WLDSW vs BWNB Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while BWNB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -27.82. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BWNB's competition here
WLDSW vs SONO Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while SONO trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SONO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check SONO's competition here
WLDSW vs UMAC Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, UMAC has a market cap of 744M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while UMAC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMAC's P/E ratio is -50.18. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to UMAC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to UMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check UMAC's competition here
WLDSW vs HEAR Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check HEAR's competition here
WLDSW vs TBCH Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 249.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while TBCH trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 251.00. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check TBCH's competition here
WLDSW vs VUZI Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 232.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while VUZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check VUZI's competition here
WLDSW vs VOXX Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check VOXX's competition here
WLDSW vs GPRO Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while GPRO trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check GPRO's competition here
WLDSW vs ZEPP Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while ZEPP trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check ZEPP's competition here
WLDSW vs KOSS Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while KOSS trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -36.09. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check KOSS's competition here
WLDSW vs FOXX Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while FOXX trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check FOXX's competition here
WLDSW vs WETH Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while WETH trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check WETH's competition here
WLDSW vs FEBO Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while FEBO trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check FEBO's competition here
WLDSW vs PXDT Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check PXDT's competition here
WLDSW vs MSN Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while MSN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check MSN's competition here
WLDSW vs MICS Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to MICS's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check MICS's competition here
WLDSW vs UTME Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check UTME's competition here
WLDSW vs WTO Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while WTO trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to WTO's ROE of -14.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check WTO's competition here
WLDSW vs RIME Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while RIME trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to RIME's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check RIME's competition here
WLDSW vs BOXL Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 793.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while BOXL trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -6.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BOXL's competition here
WLDSW vs WLDS Comparison July 2026
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 3.3M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 172.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $12.60, while WLDS trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -0.72%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is more volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check WLDS's competition here