Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See WLDS's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for WLDS and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLDS | $1.83 | -1.61% | 183.1K | -0.04 | -$46.09 | N/A |
| AAPL | $319.97 | -2.51% | 4.7T | 36.65 | $8.73 | +0.33% |
| SONY | $24.56 | -1.60% | 144.2B | 20.97 | $1.17 | +0.64% |
| LPL | $3.30 | +1.54% | 3.3B | -3.61 | -$0.91 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $15.36 | -4.95% | 1.8B | 21.94 | $0.70 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| GPRO | $1.70 | +22.30% | 290.9M | -3.15 | -$0.54 | N/A |
| TBCH | $12.48 | -0.32% | 247.7M | 249.60 | $0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL)
WLDS vs AAPL Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 4.7T. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while AAPL trades at $319.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check AAPL's competition here
Sony Group Corporation (NYSE: SONY)
WLDS vs SONY Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 144.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while SONY trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check SONY's competition here
LG Display Co., Ltd. (NYSE: LPL)
WLDS vs LPL Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while LPL trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check LPL's competition here
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (NYSE: BWSN)
WLDS vs BWSN Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check BWSN's competition here
VIZIO Holding Corp. (NYSE: VZIO)
WLDS vs VZIO Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check VZIO's competition here
Sonos, Inc. (NASDAQ: SONO)
WLDS vs SONO Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while SONO trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to SONO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check SONO's competition here
Turtle Beach Corporation (NASDAQ: HEAR)
WLDS vs HEAR Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to HEAR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check HEAR's competition here
GoPro, Inc. (NASDAQ: GPRO)
WLDS vs GPRO Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 290.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while GPRO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -5.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check GPRO's competition here
Turtle Beach Corporation (NASDAQ: TBCH)
WLDS vs TBCH Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 247.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while TBCH trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 249.60. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to TBCH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check TBCH's competition here
Vuzix Corp. (NASDAQ: VUZI)
WLDS vs VUZI Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 202.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while VUZI trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check VUZI's competition here
VOXX International Corporation (NASDAQ: VOXX)
WLDS vs VOXX Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check VOXX's competition here
Zepp Health Corporation (NYSE: ZEPP)
WLDS vs ZEPP Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while ZEPP trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check ZEPP's competition here
Universal Electronics Inc. (NASDAQ: UEIC)
WLDS vs UEIC Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while UEIC trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check UEIC's competition here
Koss Corporation (NASDAQ: KOSS)
WLDS vs KOSS Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while KOSS trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -89.50. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check KOSS's competition here
Foxx Development Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: FOXX)
WLDS vs FOXX Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while FOXX trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check FOXX's competition here
Emerson Radio Corp. (AMEX: MSN)
WLDS vs MSN Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while MSN trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check MSN's competition here
Pixie Dust Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: PXDT)
WLDS vs PXDT Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check PXDT's competition here
Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FEBO)
WLDS vs FEBO Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while FEBO trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check FEBO's competition here
The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (NASDAQ: MICS)
WLDS vs MICS Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MICS's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to MICS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check MICS's competition here
United Time Technology Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: UTME)
WLDS vs UTME Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to UTME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check UTME's competition here
Boxlight Corporation (NASDAQ: BOXL)
WLDS vs BOXL Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while BOXL trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -12.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check BOXL's competition here
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDSW)
WLDS vs WLDSW Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while WLDSW trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is less volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check WLDSW's competition here
UTime Limited (NASDAQ: FXHO)
WLDS vs FXHO Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, FXHO has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while FXHO trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FXHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to FXHO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is less volatile compared to FXHO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check FXHO's competition here
UTime Limited (NASDAQ: WTO)
WLDS vs WTO Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while WTO trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to WTO's ROE of -14.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check WTO's competition here
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: EVLVW)
WLDS vs EVLVW Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 724.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while EVLVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is more volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check EVLVW's competition here
Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIME)
WLDS vs RIME Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 532.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while RIME trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to RIME's ROE of -6.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check RIME's competition here
GMEX Robotics Corporation (NASDAQ: GMEX)
WLDS vs GMEX Comparison September 2026
Wearable Devices Ltd. (NASDAQ: WLDS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDS stands at 183.1K. In comparison, GMEX has a market cap of 117.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WLDS is priced at $1.83 on the NASDAQ, while GMEX trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GMEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDS's ROE is -0.53%, compared to GMEX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDS is less volatile compared to GMEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDS.Check GMEX's competition here