The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (MICS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MICS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICS | $0.74 | +1.89% | 7.2M | -0.50 | -$1.49 | N/A |
| AAPL | $312.66 | +1.31% | 4.6T | 37.76 | $8.28 | +0.34% |
| SONY | $21.16 | +1.78% | 124.6B | 18.07 | $1.17 | +0.75% |
| LPL | $3.65 | +1.67% | 3.6B | -182.25 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NN | $17.20 | +5.65% | 2.3B | -25.67 | -$0.67 | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $13.60 | -0.15% | 1.6B | 19.43 | $0.70 | N/A |
| BWNB | $25.02 | +0.12% | 1.3B | -27.83 | -$0.90 | N/A |
| UMAC | $21.65 | -1.95% | 730.9M | -49.30 | -$0.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MICS vs AAPL Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 4.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while AAPL trades at $312.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 37.76. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check AAPL's competition here
MICS vs SONY Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 124.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while SONY trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check SONY's competition here
MICS vs LPL Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while LPL trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -182.25. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check LPL's competition here
MICS vs BWSN Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check BWSN's competition here
MICS vs NN Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while NN trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -25.67. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to NN's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check NN's competition here
MICS vs VZIO Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check VZIO's competition here
MICS vs SONO Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while SONO trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SONO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check SONO's competition here
MICS vs BWNB Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while BWNB trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -27.83. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check BWNB's competition here
MICS vs UMAC Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, UMAC has a market cap of 730.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while UMAC trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas UMAC's P/E ratio is -49.30. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to UMAC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to UMAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check UMAC's competition here
MICS vs HEAR Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check HEAR's competition here
MICS vs TBCH Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while TBCH trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 247.60. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check TBCH's competition here
MICS vs VUZI Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 226.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while VUZI trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check VUZI's competition here
MICS vs VOXX Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check VOXX's competition here
MICS vs GPRO Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while GPRO trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check GPRO's competition here
MICS vs ZEPP Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while ZEPP trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check ZEPP's competition here
MICS vs KOSS Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while KOSS trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -37.18. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check KOSS's competition here
MICS vs FOXX Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while FOXX trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check FOXX's competition here
MICS vs WETH Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while WETH trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check WETH's competition here
MICS vs FEBO Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while FEBO trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check FEBO's competition here
MICS vs PXDT Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check PXDT's competition here
MICS vs MSN Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while MSN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check MSN's competition here
MICS vs UTME Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check UTME's competition here
MICS vs WLDSW Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while WLDSW trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check WLDSW's competition here
MICS vs WTO Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while WTO trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to WTO's ROE of -14.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check WTO's competition here
MICS vs RIME Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while RIME trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to RIME's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check RIME's competition here
MICS vs BOXL Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 801.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while BOXL trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -6.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check BOXL's competition here
MICS vs WLDS Comparison July 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 168.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while WLDS trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check WLDS's competition here