Sonos, Inc. (SONO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while AAPL trades at $308.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 37.27. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check AAPL's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 122.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while SONY trades at $20.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check SONY's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while LPL trades at $3.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check LPL's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while BWSN trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check BWSN's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while VZIO trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VZIO's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while NN trades at $16.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -24.30. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NN's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check NN's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while BWNB trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -27.82. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check BWNB's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UMAC has a market cap of 744M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while UMAC trades at $22.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas UMAC's P/E ratio is -50.18. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UMAC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to UMAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check UMAC's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while HEAR trades at $17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check HEAR's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 249.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while TBCH trades at $12.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 251.00. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check TBCH's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 232.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while VUZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VUZI's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while VOXX trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VOXX's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while GPRO trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check GPRO's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while ZEPP trades at $5.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check ZEPP's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while KOSS trades at $3.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -36.09. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check KOSS's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while FOXX trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check FOXX's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while WETH trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WETH's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while FEBO trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check FEBO's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while PXDT trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check PXDT's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while MSN trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check MSN's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while MICS trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MICS's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check MICS's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while UTME trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check UTME's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while WLDSW trades at $12.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WLDSW's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while WTO trades at $9.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTO's ROE of -14.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WTO's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while RIME trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RIME's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check RIME's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 793.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while BOXL trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -6.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check BOXL's competition here

SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 172.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.62, while WLDS trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SONO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.46, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WLDS's competition here