ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZK | $26.73 | +0.49% | 6.8B | -20.88 | -$1.28 | N/A |
| TSLA | $377.01 | -6.92% | 1.4T | 210.79 | $1.81 | N/A |
| TM | $167.57 | -1.27% | 198B | 9.14 | $18.30 | +3.60% |
| GM | $79.77 | -0.82% | 71.2B | 6.84 | $11.54 | +0.83% |
| RACE | $347.72 | -0.20% | 60.9B | 33.06 | $10.43 | +1.23% |
| F | $13.84 | -1.95% | 54.8B | -9.03 | -$1.55 | +4.27% |
| F-PC | $19.80 | -1.05% | 53.9B | N/A | N/A | +4.27% |
| F-PD | $21.41 | -1.43% | 53.9B | N/A | N/A | +4.27% |
| F-PB | $20.46 | -1.16% | 53.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.27% |
| HMC | $25.82 | -0.67% | 33.2B | -12.99 | -$1.97 | +5.20% |
Stock Comparison
ZK vs TSLA Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while TSLA trades at $377.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 210.79. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check TSLA's competition here
ZK vs TM Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 198B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while TM trades at $167.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check TM's competition here
ZK vs GM Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while GM trades at $79.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check GM's competition here
ZK vs RACE Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while RACE trades at $347.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check RACE's competition here
ZK vs F Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, F has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while F trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas F's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to F's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check F's competition here
ZK vs F-PC Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while F-PC trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to F-PC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check F-PC's competition here
ZK vs F-PD Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while F-PD trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to F-PD's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check F-PD's competition here
ZK vs F-PB Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while F-PB trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to F-PB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check F-PB's competition here
ZK vs HMC Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while HMC trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is -12.99. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check HMC's competition here
ZK vs RIVN Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while RIVN trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check RIVN's competition here
ZK vs STLA Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while STLA trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check STLA's competition here
ZK vs LI Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while LI trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas LI's P/E ratio is -46.78. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LI's competition here
ZK vs XPEV Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while XPEV trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -36.47. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check XPEV's competition here
ZK vs NIO Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while NIO trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NIO's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check NIO's competition here
ZK vs VFS Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while VFS trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check VFS's competition here
ZK vs VFSWW Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while VFSWW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check VFSWW's competition here
ZK vs BLBD Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while BLBD trades at $74.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check BLBD's competition here
ZK vs LCID Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while LCID trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LCID's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LCID's competition here
ZK vs PSNY Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while PSNY trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check PSNY's competition here
ZK vs LOTWW Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 719.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while LOTWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LOTWW's competition here
ZK vs LOT Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 700M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while LOT trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LOT's competition here
ZK vs NAKD Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check NAKD's competition here
ZK vs VLCN Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 500.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while VLCN trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check VLCN's competition here
ZK vs LVWR Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 211.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while LVWR trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LVWR's competition here
ZK vs PSNYW Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 177.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while PSNYW trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check PSNYW's competition here
ZK vs NIU Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while NIU trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check NIU's competition here
ZK vs FFIEW Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of +29.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FFIEW's competition here
ZK vs FFIE Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -35.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FFIE's competition here
ZK vs SEV Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while SEV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEV's ROE of +3.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check SEV's competition here
ZK vs FSR Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FSR's competition here
ZK vs WKHS Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while WKHS trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check WKHS's competition here
ZK vs SOLO Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check SOLO's competition here
ZK vs FFAI Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while FFAI trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FFAI's ROE of +29.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FFAI's competition here
ZK vs RIDE Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check RIDE's competition here
ZK vs PEV Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check PEV's competition here
ZK vs AIIOW Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AIIOW has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while AIIOW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas AIIOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIIOW's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to AIIOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check AIIOW's competition here
ZK vs LOBO Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while LOBO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LOBO's competition here
ZK vs ARVL Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check ARVL's competition here
ZK vs SVMH Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check SVMH's competition here
ZK vs EVTV Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while EVTV trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVTV's ROE of +12.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check EVTV's competition here
ZK vs SSM Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SSM has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while SSM trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas SSM's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to SSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check SSM's competition here
ZK vs HYZN Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check HYZN's competition here
ZK vs FABC Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FABC has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while FABC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas FABC's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FABC's ROE of -5.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FABC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FABC's competition here
ZK vs AYRO Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while AYRO trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AYRO's ROE of -1144.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check AYRO's competition here
ZK vs DMN Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check DMN's competition here
ZK vs GP Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while GP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check GP's competition here
ZK vs CENN Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while CENN trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CENN's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check CENN's competition here
ZK vs EGOX Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check EGOX's competition here
ZK vs VEV Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check VEV's competition here
ZK vs FLYE Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while FLYE trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FLYE's competition here
ZK vs ZAPP Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check ZAPP's competition here
ZK vs CJET Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 555.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while CJET trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check CJET's competition here
ZK vs FFAIW Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 552.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while FFAIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of +29.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FFAIW's competition here
ZK vs SVMHW Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SVMHW has a market cap of 543.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while SVMHW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas SVMHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVMHW's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to SVMHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check SVMHW's competition here
ZK vs GOEVW Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check GOEVW's competition here
ZK vs DCX Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DCX has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while DCX trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas DCX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to DCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check DCX's competition here
ZK vs ECDAW Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while ECDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check ECDAW's competition here
ZK vs MULN Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 539. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while MULN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MULN's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check MULN's competition here
ZK vs PTRA Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check PTRA's competition here
ZK vs ELMS Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check ELMS's competition here
ZK vs PITAW Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PITAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while PITAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas PITAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PITAW's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to PITAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check PITAW's competition here
ZK vs SODR Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SODR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while SODR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas SODR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SODR's ROE of -55.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ZK has daily volatility of 0.63 and SODR has daily volatility of N/A.Check SODR's competition here
ZK vs TTM Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check TTM's competition here
ZK vs SOLOW Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check SOLOW's competition here
ZK vs ADOM Comparison June 2026
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $26.73, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -20.88, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADOM's ROE of +12.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check ADOM's competition here