Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares (LOT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LOT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOT | $1.08 | +0.00% | 700M | -1.86 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| TSLA | $375.53 | -1.59% | 1.4T | 207.45 | $1.81 | N/A |
| TM | $167.76 | +0.32% | 198.6B | 9.16 | $18.30 | +3.59% |
| GM | $78.95 | +0.00% | 71.2B | 6.84 | $11.54 | +0.83% |
| RACE | $348.75 | +1.13% | 61.6B | 33.51 | $10.42 | +1.22% |
| F-PB | $20.47 | -0.05% | 54.6B | 14.94 | $1.36 | +4.34% |
| F-PD | $21.37 | -0.97% | 54.3B | 15.68 | $1.36 | +4.34% |
| F-PC | $19.74 | -0.50% | 54.3B | 14.40 | $1.36 | +4.34% |
| F | $13.84 | -1.11% | 54.2B | 8.61 | $1.61 | +4.34% |
| HMC | $25.76 | +0.70% | 33.4B | -13.49 | -$1.91 | +5.16% |
Stock Comparison
LOT vs TSLA Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while TSLA trades at $375.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 207.45. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check TSLA's competition here
LOT vs TM Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 198.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while TM trades at $167.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check TM's competition here
LOT vs GM Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while GM trades at $78.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check GM's competition here
LOT vs RACE Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while RACE trades at $348.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check RACE's competition here
LOT vs F-PB Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while F-PB trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to F-PB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check F-PB's competition here
LOT vs F-PD Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while F-PD trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to F-PD's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check F-PD's competition here
LOT vs F-PC Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while F-PC trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to F-PC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check F-PC's competition here
LOT vs F Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, F has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while F trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to F's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check F's competition here
LOT vs HMC Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while HMC trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is -13.49. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HMC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check HMC's competition here
LOT vs RIVN Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while RIVN trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check RIVN's competition here
LOT vs STLA Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while STLA trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to STLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check STLA's competition here
LOT vs LI Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while LI trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas LI's P/E ratio is -50.73. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check LI's competition here
LOT vs XPEV Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while XPEV trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -36.69. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check XPEV's competition here
LOT vs NIO Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while NIO trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NIO's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check NIO's competition here
LOT vs VFS Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while VFS trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check VFS's competition here
LOT vs VFSWW Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while VFSWW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check VFSWW's competition here
LOT vs ZK Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while ZK trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -20.88. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check ZK's competition here
LOT vs BLBD Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while BLBD trades at $75.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check BLBD's competition here
LOT vs LCID Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while LCID trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LCID's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check LCID's competition here
LOT vs PSNY Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while PSNY trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check PSNY's competition here
LOT vs LOTWW Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 700M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while LOTWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check LOTWW's competition here
LOT vs NAKD Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check NAKD's competition here
LOT vs VLCN Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 500.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while VLCN trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check VLCN's competition here
LOT vs LVWR Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while LVWR trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check LVWR's competition here
LOT vs PSNYW Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while PSNYW trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check PSNYW's competition here
LOT vs NIU Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 161.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while NIU trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check NIU's competition here
LOT vs FFIEW Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of +29.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check FFIEW's competition here
LOT vs FFIE Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -35.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check FFIE's competition here
LOT vs SEV Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while SEV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SEV's ROE of +3.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check SEV's competition here
LOT vs FSR Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check FSR's competition here
LOT vs DCX Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, DCX has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while DCX trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas DCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DCX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to DCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check DCX's competition here
LOT vs WKHS Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while WKHS trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check WKHS's competition here
LOT vs SOLO Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check SOLO's competition here
LOT vs FFAI Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while FFAI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FFAI's ROE of +29.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check FFAI's competition here
LOT vs RIDE Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check RIDE's competition here
LOT vs PEV Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check PEV's competition here
LOT vs AIIOW Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, AIIOW has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while AIIOW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas AIIOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AIIOW's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to AIIOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check AIIOW's competition here
LOT vs ARVL Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check ARVL's competition here
LOT vs LOBO Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while LOBO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check LOBO's competition here
LOT vs SVMH Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check SVMH's competition here
LOT vs SSM Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, SSM has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while SSM trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas SSM's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SSM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to SSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check SSM's competition here
LOT vs EVTV Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while EVTV trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EVTV's ROE of +12.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check EVTV's competition here
LOT vs HYZN Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check HYZN's competition here
LOT vs AYRO Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while AYRO trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AYRO's ROE of -1144.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check AYRO's competition here
LOT vs FABC Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, FABC has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while FABC trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas FABC's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FABC's ROE of -5.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FABC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check FABC's competition here
LOT vs DMN Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check DMN's competition here
LOT vs GP Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while GP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT and GP have similar daily volatility (4.69).Check GP's competition here
LOT vs CENN Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while CENN trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CENN's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check CENN's competition here
LOT vs EGOX Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check EGOX's competition here
LOT vs VEV Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check VEV's competition here
LOT vs FLYE Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while FLYE trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check FLYE's competition here
LOT vs ZAPP Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check ZAPP's competition here
LOT vs FFAIW Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 558.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while FFAIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of +29.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check FFAIW's competition here
LOT vs CJET Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 555.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while CJET trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check CJET's competition here
LOT vs SVMHW Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, SVMHW has a market cap of 543.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while SVMHW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas SVMHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SVMHW's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to SVMHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check SVMHW's competition here
LOT vs GOEVW Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check GOEVW's competition here
LOT vs ECDAW Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while ECDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check ECDAW's competition here
LOT vs MULN Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 539. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while MULN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MULN's ROE of +3.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check MULN's competition here
LOT vs SODR Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, SODR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while SODR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas SODR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SODR's ROE of -55.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LOT has daily volatility of 4.69 and SODR has daily volatility of N/A.Check SODR's competition here
LOT vs ADOM Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ADOM's ROE of +12.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check ADOM's competition here
LOT vs PTRA Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check PTRA's competition here
LOT vs ELMS Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check ELMS's competition here
LOT vs SOLOW Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check SOLOW's competition here
LOT vs PITAW Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, PITAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while PITAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas PITAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PITAW's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to PITAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check PITAW's competition here
LOT vs TTM Comparison June 2026
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 700M. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $1.08, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.Check TTM's competition here