ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZK | $29.50 | +0.00% | 7.4B | -23.45 | -$1.25 | N/A |
| TSLA | $335.58 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 194.45 | $1.70 | N/A |
| TM | $192.48 | +0.00% | 252.6B | 8.82 | $21.95 | +2.79% |
| RACE | $464.43 | +0.00% | 82B | 44.27 | $10.40 | +0.74% |
| GM | $56.42 | +0.00% | 53.6B | 8.60 | $6.55 | +0.90% |
| F-PD | $23.73 | +0.00% | 44.9B | N/A | N/A | +6.55% |
| F | $11.44 | +0.00% | 44.7B | 14.66 | $0.78 | +6.55% |
| F-PB | $22.75 | -0.00% | 44.3B | N/A | N/A | +6.55% |
| F-PC | $22.47 | +0.00% | 44.1B | N/A | N/A | +6.55% |
| STLA | $9.74 | +0.05% | 28.1B | -10.53 | -$0.93 | +7.86% |
Stock Comparison
ZK vs TSLA Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while TSLA trades at $335.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 194.45. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check TSLA's competition here
ZK vs TM Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 252.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while TM trades at $192.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check TM's competition here
ZK vs RACE Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while RACE trades at $464.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 44.27. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check RACE's competition here
ZK vs GM Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while GM trades at $56.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check GM's competition here
ZK vs F-PD Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while F-PD trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check F-PD's competition here
ZK vs F Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, F has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while F trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas F's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check F's competition here
ZK vs F-PB Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while F-PB trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check F-PB's competition here
ZK vs F-PC Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while F-PC trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check F-PC's competition here
ZK vs STLA Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while STLA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to STLA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check STLA's competition here
ZK vs LI Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while LI trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LI's competition here
ZK vs XPEV Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while XPEV trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -26.29. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check XPEV's competition here
ZK vs HMC Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while HMC trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check HMC's competition here
ZK vs RIVN Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while RIVN trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check RIVN's competition here
ZK vs NIO Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while NIO trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check NIO's competition here
ZK vs VFS Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while VFS trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check VFS's competition here
ZK vs LCID Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while LCID trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LCID's competition here
ZK vs PSNY Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while PSNY trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check PSNY's competition here
ZK vs BLBD Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while BLBD trades at $56.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check BLBD's competition here
ZK vs LOT Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while LOT trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LOT's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LOT's competition here
ZK vs LVWR Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while LVWR trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -8.71. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LVWR's competition here
ZK vs NAKD Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check NAKD's competition here
ZK vs VFSWW Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 608.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while VFSWW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check VFSWW's competition here
ZK vs VLCN Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 500.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while VLCN trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check VLCN's competition here
ZK vs NIU Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 397.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while NIU trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -19.19. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check NIU's competition here
ZK vs PSNYW Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 337.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while PSNYW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check PSNYW's competition here
ZK vs FFAI Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 270.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while FFAI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FFAI's competition here
ZK vs FFIEW Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FFIEW's competition here
ZK vs FFIE Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FFIE's competition here
ZK vs LOTWW Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while LOTWW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LOTWW's competition here
ZK vs FSR Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FSR's competition here
ZK vs MULN Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while MULN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check MULN's competition here
ZK vs CJET Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while CJET trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check CJET's competition here
ZK vs CENN Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while CENN trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check CENN's competition here
ZK vs SOLO Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check SOLO's competition here
ZK vs RIDE Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check RIDE's competition here
ZK vs FLYE Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while FLYE trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FLYE's competition here
ZK vs WKHS Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while WKHS trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check WKHS's competition here
ZK vs GP Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while GP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GP's ROE of -5.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check GP's competition here
ZK vs ECDAW Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check ECDAW's competition here
ZK vs PEV Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PEV's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check PEV's competition here
ZK vs ARVL Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check ARVL's competition here
ZK vs SVMH Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check SVMH's competition here
ZK vs LOBO Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while LOBO trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check LOBO's competition here
ZK vs ECDA Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while ECDA trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check ECDA's competition here
ZK vs EVTV Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while EVTV trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check EVTV's competition here
ZK vs GOEV Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK and GOEV have similar daily volatility (3.09).Check GOEV's competition here
ZK vs HYZN Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check HYZN's competition here
ZK vs FFAIW Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while FFAIW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check FFAIW's competition here
ZK vs AYRO Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while AYRO trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check AYRO's competition here
ZK vs DMN Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check DMN's competition here
ZK vs AIEV Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while AIEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check AIEV's competition here
ZK vs EGOX Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check EGOX's competition here
ZK vs VEV Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check VEV's competition here
ZK vs ZAPP Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check ZAPP's competition here
ZK vs GOEVW Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check GOEVW's competition here
ZK vs ADOM Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check ADOM's competition here
ZK vs SOLOW Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check SOLOW's competition here
ZK vs ELMS Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check ELMS's competition here
ZK vs TTM Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check TTM's competition here
ZK vs SEV Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check SEV's competition here
ZK vs PTRA Comparison August 2025
ZK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZK stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZK is priced at $29.50, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZK currently has a P/E ratio of -23.45, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ZK's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZK is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZK.Check PTRA's competition here