Zepp Health Corporation

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 4T. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while AAPL trades at $272.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check AAPL's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 127.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while SONY trades at $21.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check SONY's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while NXT trades at $120.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check NXT's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while LPL trades at $5.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LPL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check LPL's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while BWSN trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check BWSN's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while VZIO trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check VZIO's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while SONO trades at $14.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -96.25. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check SONO's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while HEAR trades at $17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check HEAR's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 242M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while VUZI trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check VUZI's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 239.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while TBCH trades at $11.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check TBCH's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while VOXX trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check VOXX's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 131.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while GPRO trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check GPRO's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while BWNB trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -15.43. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check BWNB's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while KOSS trades at $4.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -46.44. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check KOSS's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while FEBO trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check FEBO's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while PXDT trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check PXDT's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while MSN trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check MSN's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while MICS trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MICS's ROE of -13.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check MICS's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while UTME trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check UTME's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while RIME trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RIME's ROE of -54.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check RIME's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while WTO trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WTO's ROE of -5.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check WTO's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while WLDSW trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check WLDSW's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 755.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while WLDS trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check WLDS's competition here

ZEPP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZEPP stands at 336.9M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 727.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ZEPP is priced at $24.18, while BOXL trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZEPP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.88, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZEPP's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BOXL's ROE of +10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZEPP is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZEPP.Check BOXL's competition here