Zapp Electric Vehicles Group Limited
Zapp Electric Vehicles Group Limited ZAPP Peers
See (ZAPP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZAPP | $0.15 | -46.31% | 1.2M | -0.06 | -$2.56 | N/A |
| TSLA | $313.51 | +1.17% | 1T | 175.15 | $1.79 | N/A |
| TM | $170.26 | -0.07% | 222.3B | 6.93 | $24.59 | +3.17% |
| RACE | $490.66 | -1.46% | 87.4B | 47.21 | $10.39 | +1.22% |
| GM | $53.39 | +0.46% | 51.3B | 7.45 | $7.16 | +1.18% |
| F-PC | $21.85 | -0.86% | 48.1B | N/A | N/A | +6.35% |
| F | $11.78 | -1.05% | 46B | 9.42 | $1.25 | +6.35% |
| F-PB | $22.37 | -0.40% | 45.1B | N/A | N/A | +6.35% |
| F-PD | $23.60 | -0.13% | 44B | N/A | N/A | +6.35% |
| STLA | $10.07 | -2.89% | 28.8B | 4.64 | $2.17 | +23.98% |
Stock Comparison
ZAPP vs TSLA Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while TSLA trades at $313.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 175.15. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs TM Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 222.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while TM trades at $170.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs RACE Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while RACE trades at $490.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 47.21. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs GM Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while GM trades at $53.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs F-PC Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while F-PC trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs F Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, F has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while F trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas F's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs F-PB Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while F-PB trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs F-PD Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while F-PD trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs STLA Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while STLA trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs XPEV Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while XPEV trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -23.19. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs RIVN Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while RIVN trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs HMC Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while HMC trades at $30.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs LI Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while LI trades at $27.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs VFS Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while VFS trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs NIO Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while NIO trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs LCID Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while LCID trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs ZK Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while ZK trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs PSNY Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while PSNY trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs LOT Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while LOT trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOT's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs BLBD Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while BLBD trades at $44.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs LVWR Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 702.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while LVWR trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs NAKD Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs VFSWW Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 664.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while VFSWW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs PSNYW Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 362.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while PSNYW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs NIU Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 262.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while NIU trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs FLYE Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while FLYE trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -74.58. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs FFAI Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 170.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while FFAI trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs FFIEW Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs FFIE Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs LOTWW Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while LOTWW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs CJET Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while CJET trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs FSR Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs WKHS Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while WKHS trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs CENN Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while CENN trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs SOLO Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs RIDE Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs SVMH Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs ECDAW Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs GP Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while GP trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs ECDA Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while ECDA trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs PEV Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEV's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs ARVL Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs GOEV Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs AIEV Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while AIEV trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs HYZN Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs EVTV Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while EVTV trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs VLCN Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while VLCN trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs LOBO Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while LOBO trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs DMN Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs AYRO Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while AYRO trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs FFAIW Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while FFAIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs VEV Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs GOEVW Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs EGOX Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 341.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs MULN Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 282.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while MULN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs SEV Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs SOLOW Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs TTM Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs ADOM Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs ELMS Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.
ZAPP vs PTRA Comparison
ZAPP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZAPP stands at 1.2M. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZAPP is priced at $0.15, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZAPP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ZAPP's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAPP is more volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAPP.