Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 350.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while CVX trades at $175.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CVX's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 221.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while SHEL trades at $79.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SHEL's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 179.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while TTE trades at $80.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TTE's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while PBR trades at $17.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PBR's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while BP trades at $39.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check BP's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while PBR-A trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PBR-A's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while EQNR trades at $32.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check EQNR's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while E trades at $48.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas E's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check E's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while SU trades at $56.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SU's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while IMO trades at $114.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check IMO's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while CVE trades at $25.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CVE's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while EC trades at $15.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check EC's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while YPF trades at $48.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -46.17. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check YPF's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while NFG trades at $77.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check NFG's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while TGS trades at $30.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TGS's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TANNZ's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while SLNG trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLNG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SLNG's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while CGBS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CGBS's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while ZEST trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check ZEST's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while SKYQ trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SKYQ's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CGBSW's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check RDS-A's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while TELZ trades at $25.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TELZ's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while PTR trades at $46.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PTR's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while SNP trades at $45.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SNP's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 579.2B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $139.73, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.52, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check RDS-B's competition here