Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 373.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while CVX trades at $187.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CVX's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 243.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while SHEL trades at $87.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SHEL's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 181.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while TTE trades at $81.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TTE's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while PBR trades at $17.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PBR's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while BP trades at $41.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check BP's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while PBR-A trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PBR-A's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while EQNR trades at $37.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check EQNR's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while SU trades at $62.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SU's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while E trades at $49.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas E's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check E's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while IMO trades at $122.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check IMO's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while CVE trades at $27.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CVE's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while EC trades at $16.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check EC's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while YPF trades at $49.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -47.76. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check YPF's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while NFG trades at $80.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check NFG's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while TGS trades at $29.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TGS's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TANNZ's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 201.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while INR trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INR's ROE of +57.61%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check INR's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 70.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while SLNG trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is -18.95. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLNG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SLNG's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while CGBS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CGBS's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while SKYQ trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SKYQ's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while ZEST trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check ZEST's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CGBSW's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while PTR trades at $46.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PTR's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check RDS-A's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while TELZ trades at $25.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TELZ's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check RDS-B's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 610.9B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $147.39, while SNP trades at $45.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 23.07, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SNP's competition here