Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 680.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while XOM trades at $164.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to XOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check XOM's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 411.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while CVX trades at $206.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check CVX's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 268.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while SHEL trades at $96.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check SHEL's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 188B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while TTE trades at $84.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check TTE's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 139.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while PBR trades at $21.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check PBR's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while PBR-A trades at $19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check PBR-A's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 117.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while BP trades at $44.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check BP's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while EQNR trades at $42.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check EQNR's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while SU trades at $69.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check SU's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while E trades at $54.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas E's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to E's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to E. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check E's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while CVE trades at $32.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check CVE's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while EC trades at $16.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check EC's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while YPF trades at $49.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check YPF's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while NFG trades at $76.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check NFG's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check TANNZ's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while SLNG trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLNG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check SLNG's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while CGBS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check CGBS's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while SKYQ trades at $2.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check SKYQ's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while ZEST trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check ZEST's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check CGBSW's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while TELZ trades at $25.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check TELZ's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check RDS-A's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while SNP trades at $45.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check SNP's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while PTR trades at $46.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check PTR's competition here

Imperial Oil Limited (AMEX: IMO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 61.6B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $125.68 on the AMEX, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.41, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.Check RDS-B's competition here