Suncor Energy Inc.
Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SU | $68.29 | +2.25% | 81.1B | 17.79 | $3.84 | +2.51% |
| XOM | $157.92 | +3.36% | 654.6B | 26.59 | $5.94 | +2.60% |
| CVX | $191.10 | +2.39% | 380.5B | 33.23 | $5.75 | +3.63% |
| SHEL | $85.36 | +1.01% | 240.6B | 13.30 | $6.42 | +3.39% |
| TTE | $92.28 | +0.94% | 205.5B | 13.69 | $6.74 | +4.30% |
| PBR | $19.93 | +0.76% | 128.4B | 6.56 | $3.04 | +5.96% |
| BP | $44.35 | +0.53% | 116.3B | 35.77 | $1.24 | +4.50% |
| PBR-A | $17.99 | -0.33% | 115.9B | 5.92 | $3.04 | +6.64% |
| EQNR | $39.48 | +2.52% | 100.1B | 17.87 | $2.21 | +3.79% |
| E | $55.49 | +0.29% | 81.7B | 23.71 | $2.34 | +3.98% |
Stock Comparison
SU vs XOM Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 654.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while XOM trades at $157.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check XOM's competition here
SU vs CVX Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 380.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while CVX trades at $191.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 33.23. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check CVX's competition here
SU vs SHEL Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 240.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while SHEL trades at $85.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check SHEL's competition here
SU vs TTE Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 205.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while TTE trades at $92.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check TTE's competition here
SU vs PBR Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while PBR trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SU and PBR have similar daily volatility (1.92).Check PBR's competition here
SU vs BP Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 116.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while BP trades at $44.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check BP's competition here
SU vs PBR-A Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 115.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while PBR-A trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check PBR-A's competition here
SU vs EQNR Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while EQNR trades at $39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check EQNR's competition here
SU vs E Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while E trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas E's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check E's competition here
SU vs IMO Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while IMO trades at $134.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check IMO's competition here
SU vs CVE Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while CVE trades at $30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check CVE's competition here
SU vs EC Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while EC trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check EC's competition here
SU vs YPF Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while YPF trades at $43.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check YPF's competition here
SU vs NFG Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while NFG trades at $81.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check NFG's competition here
SU vs TGS Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while TGS trades at $29.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check TGS's competition here
SU vs TANNZ Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check TANNZ's competition here
SU vs SLNG Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 73.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while SLNG trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is -17.95. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLNG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check SLNG's competition here
SU vs CGBS Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check CGBS's competition here
SU vs SKYQ Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while SKYQ trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check SKYQ's competition here
SU vs ZEST Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check ZEST's competition here
SU vs CGBSW Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check CGBSW's competition here
SU vs SNP Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check SNP's competition here
SU vs RDS-A Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check RDS-A's competition here
SU vs TELZ Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check TELZ's competition here
SU vs RDS-B Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check RDS-B's competition here
SU vs PTR Comparison May 2026
SU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU stands at 81.1B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU is priced at $68.29, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SU is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.Check PTR's competition here