TravelCenters of America LLC 8% SR NT 2030
TravelCenters of America LLC 8% SR NT 2030 (TANNZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TANNZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TANNZ | $25.26 | +0.00% | 999.2M | 35.23 | $0.72 | +7.92% |
| XOM | $148.91 | -1.08% | 620.1B | 22.18 | $6.71 | +2.73% |
| CVX | $185.21 | -1.27% | 369.3B | 27.96 | $6.62 | +3.76% |
| SHEL | $89.13 | -0.16% | 252.3B | 14.85 | $6.00 | +3.25% |
| TTE | $89.73 | -0.81% | 199.9B | 15.53 | $5.78 | +4.33% |
| PBR | $20.87 | -1.88% | 134.6B | 6.87 | $3.04 | +4.98% |
| PBR-A | $18.86 | -2.43% | 121.6B | 6.21 | $3.04 | +6.06% |
| BP | $46.25 | -0.20% | 121.3B | 2312.00 | $0.02 | +4.28% |
| EQNR | $37.94 | -1.74% | 96.2B | 19.56 | $1.94 | +3.91% |
| E | $54.11 | -0.99% | 79.5B | 29.54 | $1.83 | +3.73% |
Stock Comparison
TANNZ vs XOM Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 620.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while XOM trades at $148.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check XOM's competition here
TANNZ vs CVX Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 369.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while CVX trades at $185.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check CVX's competition here
TANNZ vs SHEL Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 252.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SHEL trades at $89.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SHEL's competition here
TANNZ vs TTE Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 199.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while TTE trades at $89.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check TTE's competition here
TANNZ vs PBR Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 134.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while PBR trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check PBR's competition here
TANNZ vs PBR-A Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while PBR-A trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check PBR-A's competition here
TANNZ vs BP Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while BP trades at $46.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 2312.00. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check BP's competition here
TANNZ vs EQNR Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while EQNR trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check EQNR's competition here
TANNZ vs E Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, E has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while E trades at $54.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas E's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check E's competition here
TANNZ vs SU Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SU trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SU's competition here
TANNZ vs IMO Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 61.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while IMO trades at $124.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check IMO's competition here
TANNZ vs CVE Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while CVE trades at $26.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check CVE's competition here
TANNZ vs EC Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while EC trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check EC's competition here
TANNZ vs YPF Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while YPF trades at $42.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check YPF's competition here
TANNZ vs NFG Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while NFG trades at $88.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check NFG's competition here
TANNZ vs TGS Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while TGS trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check TGS's competition here
TANNZ vs SLNG Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SLNG trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is -51.21. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLNG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SLNG's competition here
TANNZ vs CGBS Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check CGBS's competition here
TANNZ vs SKYQ Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SKYQ trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SKYQ's competition here
TANNZ vs ZEST Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check ZEST's competition here
TANNZ vs CGBSW Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check CGBSW's competition here
TANNZ vs TELZ Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check TELZ's competition here
TANNZ vs RDS-A Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check RDS-A's competition here
TANNZ vs RDS-B Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check RDS-B's competition here
TANNZ vs PTR Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check PTR's competition here
TANNZ vs SNP Comparison April 2026
TANNZ plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TANNZ stands at 999.2M. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TANNZ is priced at $25.26, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TANNZ currently has a P/E ratio of 35.23, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TANNZ's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TANNZ is less volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TANNZ.Check SNP's competition here