Exxon Mobil Corporation

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 320.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while CVX trades at $155.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CVX's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 212.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while SHEL trades at $72.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SHEL's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 137.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while TTE trades at $61.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TTE's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 88.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while BP trades at $34.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 137.32. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check BP's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while PBR-A trades at $11.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PBR-A's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while PBR trades at $12.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PBR's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while EQNR trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check EQNR's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while E trades at $35.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas E's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check E's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while SU trades at $38.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SU's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while IMO trades at $83.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check IMO's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while CVE trades at $15.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CVE's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while EC trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check EC's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while YPF trades at $32.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check YPF's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while NFG trades at $87.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM and NFG have similar daily volatility (1.07).Check NFG's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while TGS trades at $28.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TGS's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TANNZ's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while SLNG trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 88.40. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SLNG's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while CGBS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CGBS's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while SKYQ trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SKYQ's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while ZEST trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check ZEST's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while SNP trades at $45.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SNP's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while PTR trades at $46.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PTR's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check RDS-B's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check RDS-A's competition here

XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 454B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $107.38, while TELZ trades at $25.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.13, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TELZ's competition here