Exxon Mobil Corporation
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XOM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $150.47 | -0.33% | 621.3B | 21.96 | $6.71 | +2.74% |
| CVX | $185.11 | +0.18% | 367.6B | 27.69 | $6.64 | +3.77% |
| SHEL | $80.28 | +0.81% | 229B | 13.30 | $6.00 | +3.63% |
| TTE | $78.16 | +0.42% | 173.4B | 13.47 | $5.78 | +4.93% |
| PBR | $16.28 | +3.30% | 101.9B | 7.32 | $2.16 | +6.96% |
| BP | $38.45 | -0.16% | 100.1B | 1909.25 | $0.02 | +5.15% |
| PBR-A | $15.05 | +3.51% | 94.7B | 6.80 | $2.16 | +7.67% |
| EQNR | $29.08 | +0.80% | 73B | 14.85 | $1.94 | +4.48% |
| SU | $56.12 | -1.20% | 67.4B | 15.66 | $3.56 | +2.98% |
| E | $44.10 | +0.57% | 66.5B | 22.65 | $1.95 | +4.65% |
Stock Comparison
XOM vs CVX Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 367.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while CVX trades at $185.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CVX's competition here
XOM vs SHEL Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 229B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while SHEL trades at $80.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SHEL's competition here
XOM vs TTE Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 173.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while TTE trades at $78.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TTE's competition here
XOM vs PBR Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while PBR trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PBR's competition here
XOM vs BP Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while BP trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 1909.25. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check BP's competition here
XOM vs PBR-A Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while PBR-A trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PBR-A's competition here
XOM vs EQNR Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while EQNR trades at $29.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check EQNR's competition here
XOM vs SU Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while SU trades at $56.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SU's competition here
XOM vs E Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while E trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas E's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check E's competition here
XOM vs IMO Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while IMO trades at $118.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check IMO's competition here
XOM vs CVE Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while CVE trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CVE's competition here
XOM vs EC Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while EC trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check EC's competition here
XOM vs YPF Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while YPF trades at $37.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -32.65. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check YPF's competition here
XOM vs NFG Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while NFG trades at $88.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check NFG's competition here
XOM vs TGS Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while TGS trades at $29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TGS's competition here
XOM vs TANNZ Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TANNZ's competition here
XOM vs SLNG Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while SLNG trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SLNG's competition here
XOM vs CGBS Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CGBS's competition here
XOM vs SKYQ Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while SKYQ trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SKYQ's competition here
XOM vs ZEST Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check ZEST's competition here
XOM vs CGBSW Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CGBSW's competition here
XOM vs TELZ Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TELZ's competition here
XOM vs SNP Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SNP's competition here
XOM vs RDS-B Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check RDS-B's competition here
XOM vs RDS-A Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check RDS-A's competition here
XOM vs PTR Comparison February 2026
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 621.3B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $150.47, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PTR's competition here