Exxon Mobil Corporation
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XOM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $111.49 | +0.63% | 475.9B | 14.64 | $7.54 | +3.53% |
| CVX | $155.82 | -0.01% | 317.1B | 17.68 | $8.76 | +4.31% |
| SHEL | $72.39 | +0.01% | 211.4B | 16.44 | $4.38 | +3.89% |
| TTE | $61.12 | +1.13% | 137.9B | 10.98 | $5.52 | +5.35% |
| BP | $32.66 | +1.63% | 83.6B | -78.51 | -$0.41 | +5.90% |
| PBR | $12.69 | +0.28% | 77.7B | 9.42 | $1.34 | +14.12% |
| PBR-A | $11.56 | -0.26% | 77.5B | 8.60 | $1.34 | +16.50% |
| EQNR | $26.08 | +1.54% | 64.4B | 8.40 | $3.02 | +9.28% |
| E | $34.37 | +1.10% | 52.5B | 19.19 | $1.81 | +6.59% |
| SU | $39.79 | +0.23% | 48.2B | 11.13 | $3.53 | +4.10% |
Stock Comparison
XOM vs CVX Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 317.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while CVX trades at $155.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CVX's competition here
XOM vs SHEL Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 211.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while SHEL trades at $72.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SHEL's competition here
XOM vs TTE Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 137.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while TTE trades at $61.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TTE's competition here
XOM vs BP Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while BP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -78.51. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check BP's competition here
XOM vs PBR Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while PBR trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PBR's competition here
XOM vs PBR-A Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while PBR-A trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PBR-A's competition here
XOM vs EQNR Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while EQNR trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check EQNR's competition here
XOM vs E Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while E trades at $34.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas E's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check E's competition here
XOM vs SU Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while SU trades at $39.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SU's competition here
XOM vs IMO Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while IMO trades at $84.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check IMO's competition here
XOM vs CVE Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while CVE trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CVE's competition here
XOM vs EC Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while EC trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check EC's competition here
XOM vs YPF Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while YPF trades at $33.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check YPF's competition here
XOM vs NFG Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while NFG trades at $86.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 188.07. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check NFG's competition here
XOM vs TGS Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while TGS trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TGS's competition here
XOM vs TANNZ Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TANNZ's competition here
XOM vs SLNG Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while SLNG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 59.25. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SLNG's competition here
XOM vs CGBS Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check CGBS's competition here
XOM vs SKYQ Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while SKYQ trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SKYQ's competition here
XOM vs ZEST Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check ZEST's competition here
XOM vs RDS-B Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check RDS-B's competition here
XOM vs SNP Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check SNP's competition here
XOM vs TELZ Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check TELZ's competition here
XOM vs RDS-A Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check RDS-A's competition here
XOM vs PTR Comparison July 2025
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 475.9B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $111.49, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.64, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.Check PTR's competition here