Exxon Mobil Corporation
Exxon Mobil Corporation XOM Peers
See (XOM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $102.14 | -0.54% | 440.2B | 13.55 | $7.54 | +3.85% |
| CVX | $136.54 | -0.99% | 238.5B | 15.62 | $8.74 | +4.88% |
| SHEL | $66.23 | -0.32% | 197.5B | 15.12 | $4.38 | +4.23% |
| TTE | $58.68 | +0.19% | 130.3B | 9.83 | $5.97 | +5.78% |
| BP | $29.09 | -0.27% | 76.6B | -70.95 | -$0.41 | +6.53% |
| PBR-A | $10.81 | -2.17% | 72.7B | 8.07 | $1.34 | +18.39% |
| EQNR | $23.48 | -1.88% | 64.2B | 7.48 | $3.14 | +10.07% |
| E | $29.55 | +0.24% | 45.3B | 16.89 | $1.75 | +7.74% |
| SU | $35.56 | -0.56% | 43.7B | 10.10 | $3.52 | +4.48% |
| PBR | $11.53 | -1.62% | 36.6B | 8.60 | $1.34 | +17.45% |
Stock Comparison
XOM vs CVX Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 238.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while CVX trades at $136.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs SHEL Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 197.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while SHEL trades at $66.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs TTE Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 130.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while TTE trades at $58.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs BP Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while BP trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -70.95. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs PBR-A Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while PBR-A trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs EQNR Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while EQNR trades at $23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs E Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while E trades at $29.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas E's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs SU Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while SU trades at $35.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs PBR Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while PBR trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs IMO Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while IMO trades at $71.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs CVE Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while CVE trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs EC Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while EC trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs YPF Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while YPF trades at $35.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs NFG Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while NFG trades at $82.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 179.34. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs TGS Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while TGS trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs TANNZ Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs SLNG Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 104.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while SLNG trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 70.38. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs CGBS Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while CGBS trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs SKYQ Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while SKYQ trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs ZEST Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs PTR Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs TELZ Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs RDS-B Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs SNP Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs RDS-A Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 440.2B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $102.14, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 13.55, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.