Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WWW | $17.92 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 16.96 | $1.07 | +2.18% |
| NKE | $65.61 | +0.00% | 96.7B | 38.26 | $1.71 | +2.47% |
| DECK | $118.07 | +0.00% | 17.3B | 16.86 | $7.04 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $40.42 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 16.97 | $2.41 | N/A |
| CROX | $96.48 | +0.00% | 5.2B | -66.69 | -$1.50 | N/A |
| SHOO | $39.15 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 51.14 | $0.78 | +2.11% |
| WINA | $463.39 | +0.00% | 1.6B | 41.24 | $11.21 | +2.97% |
| CAL | $12.46 | +0.00% | 444M | 20.47 | $0.64 | +2.14% |
| WEYS | $32.01 | +0.00% | 306.1M | 12.62 | $2.54 | +9.40% |
Stock Comparison
WWW vs NKE Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 96.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while NKE trades at $65.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 38.26. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check NKE's competition here
WWW vs DECK Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while DECK trades at $118.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check DECK's competition here
WWW vs SKX Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check SKX's competition here
WWW vs BIRK Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while BIRK trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check BIRK's competition here
WWW vs CROX Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while CROX trades at $96.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is -66.69. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check CROX's competition here
WWW vs SHOO Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while SHOO trades at $39.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 51.14. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check SHOO's competition here
WWW vs WINA Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while WINA trades at $463.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 41.24. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check WINA's competition here
WWW vs CAL Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while CAL trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check CAL's competition here
WWW vs WEYS Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 306.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while WEYS trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check WEYS's competition here
WWW vs RCKY Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 252.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while RCKY trades at $33.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check RCKY's competition here
WWW vs MAMK Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 197.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while MAMK trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 219.33. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check MAMK's competition here
WWW vs VRA Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while VRA trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check VRA's competition here
WWW vs SORA Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while SORA trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is -196.00. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SORA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is more volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check SORA's competition here
WWW vs FORD Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check FORD's competition here
WWW vs FWDI Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while FWDI trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check FWDI's competition here
WWW vs AREBW Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while AREBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AREBW's ROE of +9.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check AREBW's competition here
WWW vs AREB Comparison February 2026
WWW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WWW stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 72.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WWW is priced at $17.92, while AREB trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WWW currently has a P/E ratio of 16.96, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WWW's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AREB's ROE of +9.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WWW is less volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WWW.Check AREB's competition here