Steven Madden, Ltd.
Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SHOO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOO | $38.72 | -0.18% | 2.8B | 36.53 | $1.06 | +2.16% |
| NKE | $42.57 | +1.65% | 62.9B | 28.01 | $1.52 | +3.81% |
| DECK | $94.61 | +1.12% | 13.4B | 13.44 | $7.04 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $32.12 | +2.98% | 5.9B | 14.29 | $2.25 | N/A |
| CROX | $97.00 | +2.17% | 4.8B | -59.88 | -$1.62 | N/A |
| WINA | $353.06 | +0.54% | 1.3B | 31.86 | $11.08 | +4.00% |
| WWW | $15.31 | -0.26% | 1.3B | 12.44 | $1.23 | +2.62% |
| CAL | $10.97 | -0.90% | 369.8M | -52.19 | -$0.21 | +2.57% |
| WEYS | $34.89 | +0.20% | 332.6M | 14.07 | $2.48 | +8.00% |
Stock Comparison
SHOO vs NKE Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while NKE trades at $42.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check NKE's competition here
SHOO vs DECK Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while DECK trades at $94.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check DECK's competition here
SHOO vs SKX Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check SKX's competition here
SHOO vs BIRK Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while BIRK trades at $32.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check BIRK's competition here
SHOO vs CROX Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while CROX trades at $97.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is -59.88. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check CROX's competition here
SHOO vs WINA Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while WINA trades at $353.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check WINA's competition here
SHOO vs WWW Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while WWW trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check WWW's competition here
SHOO vs CAL Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while CAL trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is -52.19. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check CAL's competition here
SHOO vs WEYS Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 332.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while WEYS trades at $34.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check WEYS's competition here
SHOO vs RCKY Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 259M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while RCKY trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check RCKY's competition here
SHOO vs MAMK Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while MAMK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check MAMK's competition here
SHOO vs VRA Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while VRA trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check VRA's competition here
SHOO vs SORA Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while SORA trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SORA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check SORA's competition here
SHOO vs FORD Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check FORD's competition here
SHOO vs FWDI Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while FWDI trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check FWDI's competition here
SHOO vs AREBW Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while AREBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AREBW's ROE of -12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check AREBW's competition here
SHOO vs AREB Comparison May 2026
SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 7.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $38.72, while AREB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.53, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AREB's ROE of -12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.Check AREB's competition here