Vera Bradley, Inc.
Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VRA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRA | $3.96 | -0.75% | 110.2M | -3.37 | -$1.17 | N/A |
| NKE | $44.94 | +0.35% | 66.1B | 29.39 | $1.52 | +3.62% |
| DECK | $107.35 | -0.33% | 15.8B | 15.41 | $7.04 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $39.29 | -3.37% | 7.2B | 16.48 | $2.39 | N/A |
| CROX | $102.99 | -1.18% | 5.3B | -68.21 | -$1.50 | N/A |
| SHOO | $37.81 | -0.41% | 2.8B | 61.22 | $0.63 | +2.18% |
| WWW | $17.66 | -0.08% | 1.5B | 15.57 | $1.14 | +2.24% |
| WINA | $396.76 | -0.89% | 1.4B | 35.98 | $11.09 | +3.48% |
| CAL | $13.37 | -2.59% | 458.1M | -64.45 | -$0.21 | +2.05% |
Stock Comparison
VRA vs NKE Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while NKE trades at $44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check NKE's competition here
VRA vs DECK Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while DECK trades at $107.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check DECK's competition here
VRA vs SKX Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SKX's competition here
VRA vs BIRK Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while BIRK trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check BIRK's competition here
VRA vs CROX Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while CROX trades at $102.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is -68.21. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check CROX's competition here
VRA vs SHOO Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while SHOO trades at $37.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 61.22. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SHOO's competition here
VRA vs WWW Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while WWW trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WWW's competition here
VRA vs WINA Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while WINA trades at $396.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 35.98. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WINA's competition here
VRA vs CAL Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 458.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while CAL trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is -64.45. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to CAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check CAL's competition here
VRA vs RCKY Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while RCKY trades at $43.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check RCKY's competition here
VRA vs WEYS Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while WEYS trades at $34.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WEYS's competition here
VRA vs MAMK Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while MAMK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check MAMK's competition here
VRA vs SORA Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while SORA trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is -280.00. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to SORA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SORA's competition here
VRA vs FORD Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check FORD's competition here
VRA vs FWDI Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while FWDI trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check FWDI's competition here
VRA vs AREBW Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while AREBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AREBW's ROE of +40.62%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check AREBW's competition here
VRA vs AREB Comparison April 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 110.2M. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.96, while AREB trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -3.37, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.35%, compared to AREB's ROE of +40.62%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check AREB's competition here