Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while NKE trades at $42.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to NKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check NKE's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while DECK trades at $97.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check DECK's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while ONON trades at $37.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check ONON's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while SKX trades at $63.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SKX's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while BIRK trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check BIRK's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, VSXY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while VSXY trades at $85.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas VSXY's P/E ratio is 43.97. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VSXY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to VSXY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check VSXY's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while CROX trades at $134.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check CROX's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while SHOO trades at $43.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SHOO's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while WWW trades at $19.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to WWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WWW's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while WINA trades at $341.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WINA's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while CAL trades at $12.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to CAL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check CAL's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 368.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while WEYS trades at $38.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WEYS's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 313.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while RCKY trades at $41.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check RCKY's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 297.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while DBI trades at $5.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check DBI's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while MAMK trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check MAMK's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while LAKE trades at $10.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -11.84. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check LAKE's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while SORA trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SORA's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to SORA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SORA's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while BIRD trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check BIRD's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while FORD trades at $9.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check FORD's competition here

Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 106.4M. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 827.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.74 on the NASDAQ, while AREBW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.69, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AREBW's ROE of -12.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check AREBW's competition here