Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VRA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRA | $3.95 | +7.05% | 102.1M | -5.28 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| NKE | $45.16 | -0.10% | 66.6B | 29.63 | $1.52 | +3.60% |
| DECK | $110.81 | -1.50% | 15.3B | 15.70 | $7.02 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $48.75 | +1.71% | 9B | 22.17 | $2.21 | N/A |
| CROX | $127.59 | +1.05% | 6.3B | -78.44 | -$1.62 | N/A |
| VSXY | $79.94 | +0.65% | 6.3B | 40.58 | $1.94 | N/A |
| SHOO | $43.84 | -3.47% | 3.3B | 42.08 | $1.06 | +1.88% |
| WWW | $17.53 | -1.35% | 1.5B | 14.43 | $1.23 | +2.28% |
| WINA | $409.71 | +1.76% | 1.4B | 36.45 | $11.09 | +3.46% |
Stock Comparison
VRA vs NKE Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while NKE trades at $45.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check NKE's competition here
VRA vs DECK Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while DECK trades at $110.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check DECK's competition here
VRA vs SKX Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SKX's competition here
VRA vs BIRK Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while BIRK trades at $48.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check BIRK's competition here
VRA vs CROX Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while CROX trades at $127.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is -78.44. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check CROX's competition here
VRA vs VSXY Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, VSXY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while VSXY trades at $79.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas VSXY's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VSXY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to VSXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check VSXY's competition here
VRA vs SHOO Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while SHOO trades at $43.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 42.08. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SHOO's competition here
VRA vs WWW Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while WWW trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WWW's competition here
VRA vs WINA Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while WINA trades at $409.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 36.45. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WINA's competition here
VRA vs CAL Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 449.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while CAL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is -63.76. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check CAL's competition here
VRA vs FWDI Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 360.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while FWDI trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check FWDI's competition here
VRA vs WEYS Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 345.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while WEYS trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WEYS's competition here
VRA vs RCKY Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while RCKY trades at $40.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check RCKY's competition here
VRA vs MAMK Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while MAMK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check MAMK's competition here
VRA vs SORA Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while SORA trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SORA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SORA's competition here
VRA vs FORD Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check FORD's competition here
VRA vs AREBW Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while AREBW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AREBW's ROE of -12.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check AREBW's competition here
VRA vs AREB Comparison June 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 102.1M. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 21.9K. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.95, while AREB trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -5.28, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AREB's ROE of -12.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check AREB's competition here