Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VRA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRA | $3.81 | -2.56% | 108.3M | -11.91 | -$0.32 | N/A |
| NKE | $43.34 | -1.70% | 64.1B | 20.73 | $2.09 | +3.76% |
| DECK | $105.67 | +0.94% | 14.7B | 15.01 | $7.04 | N/A |
| ONON | $36.87 | +0.11% | 12.3B | 31.50 | $1.17 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $46.16 | +0.37% | 8.5B | 20.99 | $2.20 | N/A |
| CROX | $125.78 | +0.40% | 6.2B | 10.12 | $12.43 | N/A |
| VSXY | $77.87 | +1.51% | 6.2B | 40.12 | $1.94 | N/A |
| SHOO | $39.71 | -0.53% | 2.9B | 25.46 | $1.56 | +2.12% |
| WINA | $421.58 | -0.64% | 1.5B | 37.98 | $11.10 | +3.32% |
Stock Comparison
VRA vs NKE Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while NKE trades at $43.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check NKE's competition here
VRA vs DECK Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while DECK trades at $105.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check DECK's competition here
VRA vs ONON Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while ONON trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check ONON's competition here
VRA vs SKX Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SKX's competition here
VRA vs BIRK Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while BIRK trades at $46.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check BIRK's competition here
VRA vs CROX Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while CROX trades at $125.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check CROX's competition here
VRA vs VSXY Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, VSXY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while VSXY trades at $77.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas VSXY's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VSXY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to VSXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check VSXY's competition here
VRA vs SHOO Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while SHOO trades at $39.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SHOO's competition here
VRA vs WINA Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while WINA trades at $421.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WINA's competition here
VRA vs WWW Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while WWW trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WWW's competition here
VRA vs CAL Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 395.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while CAL trades at $11.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check CAL's competition here
VRA vs WEYS Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 369.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while WEYS trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check WEYS's competition here
VRA vs RCKY Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 299.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while RCKY trades at $39.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check RCKY's competition here
VRA vs MAMK Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while MAMK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check MAMK's competition here
VRA vs LAKE Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while LAKE trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check LAKE's competition here
VRA vs SORA Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while SORA trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SORA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check SORA's competition here
VRA vs FORD Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check FORD's competition here
VRA vs AREBW Comparison July 2026
VRA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VRA stands at 108.3M. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VRA is priced at $3.81, while AREBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VRA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.91, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRA's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AREBW's ROE of -12.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRA is more volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRA.Check AREBW's competition here