Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DECK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DECK | $104.69 | +4.35% | 14.5B | 14.87 | $7.04 | N/A |
| NKE | $44.09 | +2.39% | 65.2B | 21.10 | $2.09 | +3.70% |
| ONON | $36.83 | +3.57% | 12.3B | 31.48 | $1.17 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $45.99 | +4.45% | 8.5B | 20.90 | $2.20 | N/A |
| CROX | $125.28 | +0.89% | 6.2B | 10.08 | $12.43 | N/A |
| VSXY | $76.71 | -1.29% | 6.1B | 39.55 | $1.94 | N/A |
| SHOO | $39.92 | -3.99% | 2.9B | 25.59 | $1.56 | +2.10% |
| WINA | $424.29 | +1.00% | 1.5B | 38.22 | $11.10 | +3.28% |
| WWW | $16.53 | +2.54% | 1.4B | 11.72 | $1.41 | +2.42% |
Stock Comparison
DECK vs NKE Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while NKE trades at $44.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check NKE's competition here
DECK vs ONON Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while ONON trades at $36.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check ONON's competition here
DECK vs SKX Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check SKX's competition here
DECK vs BIRK Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while BIRK trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check BIRK's competition here
DECK vs CROX Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while CROX trades at $125.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check CROX's competition here
DECK vs VSXY Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, VSXY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while VSXY trades at $76.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas VSXY's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VSXY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to VSXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check VSXY's competition here
DECK vs SHOO Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while SHOO trades at $39.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check SHOO's competition here
DECK vs WINA Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while WINA trades at $424.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 38.22. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check WINA's competition here
DECK vs WWW Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while WWW trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check WWW's competition here
DECK vs CAL Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 393.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while CAL trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check CAL's competition here
DECK vs WEYS Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while WEYS trades at $39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check WEYS's competition here
DECK vs RCKY Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 303.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while RCKY trades at $40.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check RCKY's competition here
DECK vs MAMK Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while MAMK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check MAMK's competition here
DECK vs LAKE Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 122M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while LAKE trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check LAKE's competition here
DECK vs VRA Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while VRA trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check VRA's competition here
DECK vs SORA Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while SORA trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SORA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check SORA's competition here
DECK vs FORD Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check FORD's competition here
DECK vs AREBW Comparison July 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 14.5B. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $104.69, while AREBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.87, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AREBW's ROE of -12.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check AREBW's competition here