Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DECK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DECK | $113.83 | -0.47% | 15.8B | 16.22 | $7.02 | N/A |
| NKE | $44.93 | -2.24% | 66.4B | 29.54 | $1.52 | +3.61% |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $48.75 | +5.50% | 9B | 22.08 | $2.21 | N/A |
| VSXY | $78.88 | +0.13% | 6.3B | 40.66 | $1.94 | N/A |
| CROX | $124.71 | -0.92% | 6.2B | -76.98 | -$1.62 | N/A |
| SHOO | $46.15 | +0.57% | 3.4B | 43.54 | $1.06 | +1.81% |
| WWW | $18.02 | +7.26% | 1.4B | 13.87 | $1.23 | +2.20% |
| WINA | $400.62 | +8.21% | 1.4B | 34.89 | $11.11 | +3.47% |
| CAL | $14.64 | -0.61% | 491.8M | -69.71 | -$0.21 | +1.91% |
Stock Comparison
DECK vs NKE Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while NKE trades at $44.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check NKE's competition here
DECK vs SKX Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check SKX's competition here
DECK vs BIRK Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while BIRK trades at $48.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check BIRK's competition here
DECK vs VSXY Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, VSXY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while VSXY trades at $78.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas VSXY's P/E ratio is 40.66. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VSXY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to VSXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check VSXY's competition here
DECK vs CROX Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while CROX trades at $124.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is -76.98. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check CROX's competition here
DECK vs SHOO Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while SHOO trades at $46.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 43.54. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check SHOO's competition here
DECK vs WWW Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while WWW trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check WWW's competition here
DECK vs WINA Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while WINA trades at $400.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 34.89. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check WINA's competition here
DECK vs CAL Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 491.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while CAL trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is -69.71. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check CAL's competition here
DECK vs WEYS Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 342.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while WEYS trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check WEYS's competition here
DECK vs FWDI Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while FWDI trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check FWDI's competition here
DECK vs RCKY Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 302.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while RCKY trades at $40.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check RCKY's competition here
DECK vs MAMK Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while MAMK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check MAMK's competition here
DECK vs VRA Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while VRA trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check VRA's competition here
DECK vs SORA Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while SORA trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SORA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check SORA's competition here
DECK vs FORD Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check FORD's competition here
DECK vs AREBW Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while AREBW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AREBW's ROE of -12.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check AREBW's competition here
DECK vs AREB Comparison June 2026
DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 15.8B. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 20.3K. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $113.83, while AREB trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 16.22, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AREB's ROE of -12.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.Check AREB's competition here