American Rebel Holdings, Inc.
American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREBW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AREBW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AREBW | $0.01 | -1.00% | 2.4M | N/A | -$5.74 | N/A |
| NKE | $41.88 | -0.33% | 61.9B | 27.56 | $1.52 | +3.85% |
| DECK | $93.56 | -1.48% | 13.3B | 13.29 | $7.04 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $31.19 | -8.61% | 5.7B | 13.86 | $2.25 | N/A |
| CROX | $94.94 | -2.28% | 4.7B | -58.60 | -$1.62 | N/A |
| SHOO | $38.79 | -1.77% | 2.8B | 36.59 | $1.06 | +2.17% |
| WWW | $15.35 | +0.85% | 1.3B | 13.45 | $1.14 | +2.62% |
| WINA | $351.18 | -2.94% | 1.3B | 31.67 | $11.09 | +3.94% |
| CAL | $11.07 | -0.72% | 373.7M | -52.74 | -$0.21 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
AREBW vs NKE Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while NKE trades at $41.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check NKE's competition here
AREBW vs DECK Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while DECK trades at $93.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check DECK's competition here
AREBW vs SKX Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check SKX's competition here
AREBW vs BIRK Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while BIRK trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check BIRK's competition here
AREBW vs CROX Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while CROX trades at $94.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is -58.60. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check CROX's competition here
AREBW vs SHOO Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while SHOO trades at $38.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check SHOO's competition here
AREBW vs WWW Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while WWW trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check WWW's competition here
AREBW vs WINA Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while WINA trades at $351.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check WINA's competition here
AREBW vs CAL Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 373.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while CAL trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is -52.74. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to CAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check CAL's competition here
AREBW vs WEYS Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 331.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while WEYS trades at $34.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check WEYS's competition here
AREBW vs RCKY Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 254.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while RCKY trades at $33.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check RCKY's competition here
AREBW vs MAMK Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while MAMK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check MAMK's competition here
AREBW vs VRA Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while VRA trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check VRA's competition here
AREBW vs SORA Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while SORA trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to SORA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check SORA's competition here
AREBW vs FORD Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check FORD's competition here
AREBW vs FWDI Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while FWDI trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check FWDI's competition here
AREBW vs AREB Comparison May 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 2.4M. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while AREB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is -12.27%, compared to AREB's ROE of -12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check AREB's competition here