Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while MMC trades at $182.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check MMC's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while MRSH trades at $174.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check MRSH's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while AON trades at $325.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check AON's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while AJG trades at $219.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check AJG's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while WLTW trades at $231.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check WLTW's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while BRO trades at $66.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check BRO's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while ERIE trades at $253.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check ERIE's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while ARX trades at $13.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check ARX's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while CRVL trades at $53.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check CRVL's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while BRP trades at $32.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check BRP's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while FANH trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check FANH's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while BWIN trades at $22.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -44.70. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check BWIN's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 503.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while CRD-A trades at $10.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check CRD-A's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 500.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while CRD-B trades at $10.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check CRD-B's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 271.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while TWFG trades at $18.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check TWFG's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while SLQT trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -20.16. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check SLQT's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while EHTH trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EHTH's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while GOCO trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check GOCO's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while ZBAO trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check ZBAO's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while EZRA trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EZRA's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while RELI trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check RELI's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 721.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while HUIZ trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check HUIZ's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EZRAW's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while RELIW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check RELIW's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while TIRX trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check TIRX's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, EFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while EFM trades at $25.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas EFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EFM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to EFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check EFM's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, MER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while MER trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas MER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is more volatile compared to MER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check MER's competition here

WTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WTW stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GIWWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WTW is priced at $289.86, while GIWWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WTW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.76, whereas GIWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WTW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GIWWW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTW is less volatile compared to GIWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTW.Check GIWWW's competition here