Worthington Steel, Inc. (WS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WS | $38.57 | +4.72% | 2B | 17.83 | $2.16 | +1.67% |
| NUE | $239.78 | -3.66% | 54.6B | 23.52 | $10.19 | +0.93% |
| MT | $59.88 | -3.14% | 45.6B | 16.88 | $3.55 | +0.96% |
| STLD | $245.49 | -2.20% | 35.4B | 26.26 | $9.35 | +0.84% |
| RS | $385.78 | -4.93% | 19.7B | 24.68 | $15.63 | +1.27% |
| PKX | $49.96 | -4.24% | 15.1B | 29.56 | $1.69 | +3.26% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | N/A |
| TX | $44.44 | -2.05% | 8.7B | 14.41 | $3.09 | +4.98% |
| GGB | $4.15 | +0.24% | 8.3B | 11.87 | $0.35 | +3.08% |
| CMC | $69.20 | -6.60% | 7.7B | 11.33 | $6.10 | +1.08% |
Stock Comparison
WS vs NUE Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while NUE trades at $239.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check NUE's competition here
WS vs MT Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while MT trades at $59.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check MT's competition here
WS vs STLD Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while STLD trades at $245.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check STLD's competition here
WS vs RS Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while RS trades at $385.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check RS's competition here
WS vs PKX Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while PKX trades at $49.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check PKX's competition here
WS vs X Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to X's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check X's competition here
WS vs TX Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while TX trades at $44.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check TX's competition here
WS vs GGB Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while GGB trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check GGB's competition here
WS vs CMC Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while CMC trades at $69.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check CMC's competition here
WS vs CLF Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while CLF trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check CLF's competition here
WS vs SIM Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while SIM trades at $29.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check SIM's competition here
WS vs SID Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while SID trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check SID's competition here
WS vs SCHN Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check SCHN's competition here
WS vs TMST Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TMST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check TMST's competition here
WS vs RDUS Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check RDUS's competition here
WS vs MTUS Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 829.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while MTUS trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is 41.52. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check MTUS's competition here
WS vs ZEUS Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check ZEUS's competition here
WS vs ASTL Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 440.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while ASTL trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check ASTL's competition here
WS vs USAP Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check USAP's competition here
WS vs MSB Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while MSB trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 28.83. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check MSB's competition here
WS vs FRD Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while FRD trades at $34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check FRD's competition here
WS vs SYNL Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check SYNL's competition here
WS vs LUD Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while LUD trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is 160.50. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LUD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check LUD's competition here
WS vs KBSX Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while KBSX trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check KBSX's competition here
WS vs HLP Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while HLP trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check HLP's competition here
WS vs HUDI Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while HUDI trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check HUDI's competition here
WS vs ZKIN Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while ZKIN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check ZKIN's competition here
WS vs MTCN Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, MTCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while MTCN trades at $61.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MTCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to MTCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check MTCN's competition here
WS vs MTL-P Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check MTL-P's competition here
WS vs MTL Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check MTL's competition here
WS vs OSN Comparison June 2026
WS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WS stands at 2B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WS is priced at $38.57, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.83, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, WS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WS is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WS.Check OSN's competition here