Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FRD's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FRD and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRD | $35.60 | +4.52% | 253M | 12.90 | $2.76 | +0.45% |
| NUE | $247.56 | +2.66% | 56.4B | 24.31 | $10.19 | +0.90% |
| MT | $66.88 | +1.15% | 50.9B | 18.84 | $3.55 | +0.86% |
| STLD | $247.11 | +2.72% | 35.6B | 26.43 | $9.35 | +0.84% |
| CRS | $603.69 | +0.36% | 30B | 62.03 | $9.74 | +0.13% |
| RS | $407.83 | +3.15% | 20.8B | 26.11 | $15.63 | +1.19% |
| PKX | $52.34 | -1.87% | 15.8B | 30.97 | $1.69 | +3.09% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | N/A |
| GGB | $4.81 | +0.94% | 9.5B | 13.71 | $0.35 | +2.64% |
| TX | $47.30 | +0.34% | 9.3B | 15.31 | $3.09 | +4.65% |
Stock Comparison
Nucor Corporation (NYSE: NUE)
FRD vs NUE Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while NUE trades at $247.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check NUE's competition here
ArcelorMittal S.A. (NYSE: MT)
FRD vs MT Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while MT trades at $66.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MT's competition here
Steel Dynamics, Inc. (NASDAQ: STLD)
FRD vs STLD Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while STLD trades at $247.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check STLD's competition here
Carpenter Technology Corporation (NYSE: CRS)
FRD vs CRS Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, CRS has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while CRS trades at $603.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas CRS's P/E ratio is 62.03. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to CRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check CRS's competition here
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (NYSE: RS)
FRD vs RS Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while RS trades at $407.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to RS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check RS's competition here
POSCO Holdings Inc. (NYSE: PKX)
FRD vs PKX Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while PKX trades at $52.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 30.97. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check PKX's competition here
United States Steel Corporation (NYSE: X)
FRD vs X Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to X's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to X. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check X's competition here
Gerdau S.A. (NYSE: GGB)
FRD vs GGB Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while GGB trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check GGB's competition here
Ternium S.A. (NYSE: TX)
FRD vs TX Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while TX trades at $47.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check TX's competition here
Commercial Metals Company (NYSE: CMC)
FRD vs CMC Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while CMC trades at $68.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check CMC's competition here
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE: CLF)
FRD vs CLF Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while CLF trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check CLF's competition here
Grupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V. (AMEX: SIM)
FRD vs SIM Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while SIM trades at $26.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to SIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SIM's competition here
Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE: WS)
FRD vs WS Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while WS trades at $35.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to WS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check WS's competition here
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (NYSE: SID)
FRD vs SID Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while SID trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to SID. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SID's competition here
Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCHN)
FRD vs SCHN Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SCHN's competition here
TimkenSteel Corporation (NYSE: TMST)
FRD vs TMST Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TMST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check TMST's competition here
Metallus Inc. (NYSE: MTUS)
FRD vs MTUS Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 872.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while MTUS trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is 43.69. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTUS's competition here
Radius Recycling, Inc. (NASDAQ: RDUS)
FRD vs RDUS Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check RDUS's competition here
Olympic Steel, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZEUS)
FRD vs ZEUS Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ZEUS's competition here
Algoma Steel Group Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTL)
FRD vs ASTL Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 455.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while ASTL trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ASTL's competition here
Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. (NASDAQ: USAP)
FRD vs USAP Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check USAP's competition here
Mesabi Trust (NYSE: MSB)
FRD vs MSB Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while MSB trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MSB's competition here
Synalloy Corporation (NASDAQ: SYNL)
FRD vs SYNL Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check SYNL's competition here
Luda Technology Group Limited (AMEX: LUD)
FRD vs LUD Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 92.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while LUD trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is 136.33. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to LUD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check LUD's competition here
Hongli Group Inc. (NASDAQ: HLP)
FRD vs HLP Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while HLP trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check HLP's competition here
FST Corp. (NASDAQ: KBSX)
FRD vs KBSX Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while KBSX trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check KBSX's competition here
Huadi International Group Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: HUDI)
FRD vs HUDI Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while HUDI trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check HUDI's competition here
ZK International Group Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: ZKIN)
FRD vs ZKIN Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while ZKIN trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check ZKIN's competition here
Ossen Innovation Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: OSN)
FRD vs OSN Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check OSN's competition here
Mechel PAO (NYSE: MTL)
FRD vs MTL Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTL's competition here
Mechel PAO (NYSE: MTL-P)
FRD vs MTL-P Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTL-P's competition here
ArcelorMittal 5.50% Mandatorily (NYSE: MTCN)
FRD vs MTCN Comparison July 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated (NASDAQ: FRD) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRD stands at 253M. In comparison, MTCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRD is priced at $35.60 on the NASDAQ, while MTCN trades at $61.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRD currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas MTCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRD's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRD is more volatile compared to MTCN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRD.Check MTCN's competition here