Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRS | $597.24 | -2.12% | 29.7B | 61.32 | $9.74 | +0.13% |
| ATI | $188.10 | -2.12% | 25.7B | 53.44 | $3.52 | N/A |
| MLI | $56.50 | -1.60% | 12.5B | 8.81 | $6.41 | +1.50% |
| DPC | $48.64 | +2.31% | 7.1B | -125.23 | -$0.39 | N/A |
| ESAB | $92.78 | -0.97% | 5.6B | 17.37 | $5.34 | +0.45% |
| GPGI | $16.75 | +0.72% | 4.9B | 27.92 | $0.60 | +0.04% |
| AZZ | $150.01 | +0.07% | 4.5B | 24.23 | $6.19 | +0.53% |
| ARNC | $29.99 | +0.03% | 3B | -12.55 | -$2.39 | N/A |
| WOR | $54.57 | +1.04% | 2.7B | 16.34 | $3.34 | +1.39% |
| CMPOW | $12.15 | +2.35% | 2.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.04% |
Stock Comparison
CRS vs ATI Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while ATI trades at $188.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 53.44. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ATI's competition here
CRS vs MLI Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while MLI trades at $56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MLI's competition here
CRS vs DPC Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, DPC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while DPC trades at $48.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas DPC's P/E ratio is -125.23. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to DPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check DPC's competition here
CRS vs ESAB Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while ESAB trades at $92.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ESAB's competition here
CRS vs GPGI Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, GPGI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while GPGI trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas GPGI's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPGI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to GPGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check GPGI's competition here
CRS vs AZZ Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while AZZ trades at $150.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AZZ's competition here
CRS vs ARNC Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while ARNC trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ARNC's competition here
CRS vs WOR Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while WOR trades at $54.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check WOR's competition here
CRS vs CMPOW Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while CMPOW trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check CMPOW's competition here
CRS vs CMPO Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while CMPO trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMPO's ROE of -72.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check CMPO's competition here
CRS vs NWPX Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while NWPX trades at $136.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check NWPX's competition here
CRS vs HAYN Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while HAYN trades at $60.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check HAYN's competition here
CRS vs RYI Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 746.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while RYI trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check RYI's competition here
CRS vs CMPOV Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, CMPOV has a market cap of 741.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while CMPOV trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas CMPOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMPOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to CMPOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check CMPOV's competition here
CRS vs MEC Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 686.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while MEC trades at $33.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is -1119.33. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MEC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MEC's competition here
CRS vs IIIN Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 581.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while IIIN trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check IIIN's competition here
CRS vs ELMT Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, ELMT has a market cap of 522.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while ELMT trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas ELMT's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELMT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to ELMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ELMT's competition here
CRS vs ASTLW Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 426.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while ASTLW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ASTLW's competition here
CRS vs TG Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 270.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while TG trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas TG's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TG's competition here
CRS vs GIFI Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while GIFI trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check GIFI's competition here
CRS vs AP Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 149.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while AP trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas AP's P/E ratio is -31.96. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AP's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AP's competition here
CRS vs ZJK Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, ZJK has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while ZJK trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas ZJK's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZJK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ZJK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ZJK's competition here
CRS vs TPCS Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while TPCS trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -29.53. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TPCS's competition here
CRS vs TRSG Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while TRSG trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is -57.30. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TRSG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TRSG's competition here
CRS vs SGBXV Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SGBXV has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while SGBXV trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas SGBXV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGBXV's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to SGBXV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check SGBXV's competition here
CRS vs HIHO Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while HIHO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HIHO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check HIHO's competition here
CRS vs OLOX Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, OLOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while OLOX trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas OLOX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLOX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to OLOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check OLOX's competition here
CRS vs SGBX Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 533.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while SGBX trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGBX's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check SGBX's competition here
CRS vs AP-WT Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 172.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while AP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AP-WT's competition here
CRS vs LNKS Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, LNKS has a market cap of 87.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while LNKS trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas LNKS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LNKS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to LNKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check LNKS's competition here
CRS vs MTEN Comparison July 2026
CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 29.7B. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 49.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $597.24, while MTEN trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.32, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MTEN's competition here