Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while ATI trades at $195.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 65.50. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ATI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while MLI trades at $138.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MLI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while ESAB trades at $98.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ESAB's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while AZZ trades at $154.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AZZ's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, GPGI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while GPGI trades at $14.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas GPGI's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPGI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to GPGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check GPGI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while ARNC trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ARNC's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while WOR trades at $60.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 181.23. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check WOR's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while CMPOW trades at $12.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check CMPOW's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while CMPO trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMPO's ROE of -72.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check CMPO's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while NWPX trades at $131.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check NWPX's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while HAYN trades at $60.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check HAYN's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 746.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while RYI trades at $23.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check RYI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, CMPOV has a market cap of 741.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while CMPOV trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas CMPOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMPOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to CMPOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check CMPOV's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 727.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while MEC trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is -44.35. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MEC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MEC's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ELMT has a market cap of 612.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while ELMT trades at $19.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas ELMT's P/E ratio is -146.04. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELMT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to ELMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ELMT's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 561.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while IIIN trades at $29.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check IIIN's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 286.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while TG trades at $8.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas TG's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TG's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 240.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while AP trades at $12.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas AP's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AP's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AP's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while GIFI trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is more volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check GIFI's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, ZJK has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while ZJK trades at $2.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas ZJK's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZJK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to ZJK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check ZJK's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while TPCS trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -29.92. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TPCS's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while TRSG trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is 31.10. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TRSG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check TRSG's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, SGBXV has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while SGBXV trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas SGBXV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGBXV's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to SGBXV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check SGBXV's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, OLOX has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while OLOX trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas OLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLOX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to OLOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check OLOX's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while HIHO trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HIHO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check HIHO's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 533.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while SGBX trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGBX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check SGBX's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 172.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while AP-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check AP-WT's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, LNKS has a market cap of 85.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while LNKS trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas LNKS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LNKS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to LNKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check LNKS's competition here

CRS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRS stands at 27.9B. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 84.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CRS is priced at $566.02, while MTEN trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRS currently has a P/E ratio of 59.01, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CRS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.Check MTEN's competition here