ArcelorMittal S.A. (MT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MT | $67.21 | -6.20% | 51.1B | 17.59 | $3.82 | +0.86% |
| NUE | $254.39 | -3.01% | 57.9B | 25.23 | $10.08 | +0.88% |
| STLD | $268.50 | -3.02% | 38.7B | 28.75 | $9.34 | +0.76% |
| RS | $394.41 | -0.52% | 20.1B | 25.76 | $15.32 | +1.24% |
| PKX | $61.59 | -7.62% | 18.6B | 33.09 | $1.86 | +2.86% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | N/A |
| TX | $48.02 | -4.19% | 9.4B | 16.03 | $3.00 | +4.62% |
| GGB | $4.59 | -2.55% | 9.1B | 28.66 | $0.16 | +2.82% |
| CMC | $74.15 | -2.77% | 8.2B | 16.59 | $4.47 | +1.01% |
| CLF | $13.53 | -6.24% | 7.7B | -5.85 | -$2.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MT vs NUE Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while NUE trades at $254.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check NUE's competition here
MT vs STLD Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while STLD trades at $268.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check STLD's competition here
MT vs RS Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while RS trades at $394.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check RS's competition here
MT vs PKX Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while PKX trades at $61.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check PKX's competition here
MT vs X Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to X's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check X's competition here
MT vs TX Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while TX trades at $48.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check TX's competition here
MT vs GGB Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while GGB trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check GGB's competition here
MT vs CMC Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while CMC trades at $74.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check CMC's competition here
MT vs CLF Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while CLF trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check CLF's competition here
MT vs SIM Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while SIM trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SIM's competition here
MT vs WS Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while WS trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check WS's competition here
MT vs SID Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while SID trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SID's competition here
MT vs SCHN Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SCHN's competition here
MT vs TMST Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check TMST's competition here
MT vs RDUS Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check RDUS's competition here
MT vs MTUS Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 818.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while MTUS trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is 281.00. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MTUS's competition here
MT vs ZEUS Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ZEUS's competition here
MT vs ASTL Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 520.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while ASTL trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ASTL's competition here
MT vs USAP Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check USAP's competition here
MT vs MSB Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 321.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while MSB trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MSB's competition here
MT vs FRD Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 173.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while FRD trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check FRD's competition here
MT vs SYNL Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SYNL's competition here
MT vs ACNT Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while ACNT trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -23.77. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ACNT's competition here
MT vs LUD Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 113.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while LUD trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is 166.67. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LUD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check LUD's competition here
MT vs KBSX Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while KBSX trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check KBSX's competition here
MT vs HLP Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while HLP trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check HLP's competition here
MT vs HUDI Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while HUDI trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check HUDI's competition here
MT vs ZKIN Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while ZKIN trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ZKIN's competition here
MT vs ASTLW Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while ASTLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ASTLW's competition here
MT vs INHD Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 16.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while INHD trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check INHD's competition here
MT vs OSN Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check OSN's competition here
MT vs MTL Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MTL's competition here
MT vs MTCN Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, MTCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while MTCN trades at $61.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MTCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to MTCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MTCN's competition here
MT vs MTL-P Comparison June 2026
MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 51.1B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $67.21, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MTL-P's competition here