ArcelorMittal S.A. (MT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while NUE trades at $239.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check NUE's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while STLD trades at $245.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check STLD's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while RS trades at $385.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check RS's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while PKX trades at $49.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check PKX's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while X trades at $54.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to X's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check X's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while TX trades at $44.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check TX's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while GGB trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check GGB's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while CMC trades at $69.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check CMC's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while CLF trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check CLF's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while SIM trades at $29.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SIM's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while WS trades at $38.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check WS's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while SID trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SID's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while SCHN trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SCHN's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while TMST trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check TMST's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while RDUS trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check RDUS's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 829.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while MTUS trades at $19.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is 41.52. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MTUS's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ZEUS's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 440.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while ASTL trades at $4.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ASTL's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while USAP trades at $44.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check USAP's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while MSB trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 28.83. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MSB's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while FRD trades at $34.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check FRD's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while SYNL trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check SYNL's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, LUD has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while LUD trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas LUD's P/E ratio is 160.50. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LUD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to LUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check LUD's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while KBSX trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check KBSX's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while HLP trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check HLP's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while HUDI trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check HUDI's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while ZKIN trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check ZKIN's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MTCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while MTCN trades at $61.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas MTCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to MTCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MTCN's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MTL-P's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while MTL trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check MTL's competition here

MT plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MT stands at 45.6B. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MT is priced at $59.88, while OSN trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.88, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, MT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MT is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MT.Check OSN's competition here