Worth Peripherals Limited

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.BO has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TIMETECHNO.BO trades at ₹188.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TIMETECHNO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIMETECHNO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TIMETECHNO.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.NS has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TIMETECHNO.NS trades at ₹187.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TIMETECHNO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIMETECHNO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TIMETECHNO.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EPL.BO has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while EPL.BO trades at ₹224.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas EPL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to EPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check EPL.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EPL.NS has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while EPL.NS trades at ₹222.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas EPL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to EPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check EPL.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BORORENEW.BO has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BORORENEW.BO trades at ₹517.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BORORENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -114.60. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BORORENEW.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BORORENEW.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BORORENEW.NS has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BORORENEW.NS trades at ₹514.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BORORENEW.NS's P/E ratio is -114.58. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BORORENEW.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BORORENEW.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGI.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AGI.BO trades at ₹566.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AGI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to AGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AGI.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGI.NS has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AGI.NS trades at ₹563.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AGI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to AGI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AGI.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAXVIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while MAXVIL.NS trades at ₹216.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas MAXVIL.NS's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAXVIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to MAXVIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check MAXVIL.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UFLEX.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while UFLEX.NS trades at ₹398.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas UFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to UFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check UFLEX.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UFLEX.BO has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while UFLEX.BO trades at ₹397.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas UFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to UFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check UFLEX.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.NS has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TCPLPACK.NS trades at ₹2,667.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TCPLPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCPLPACK.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TCPLPACK.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TCPLPACK.BO trades at ₹2,641.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TCPLPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCPLPACK.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TCPLPACK.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while MOLDTKPAC.BO trades at ₹601.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas MOLDTKPAC.BO's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check MOLDTKPAC.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while MOLDTKPAC.NS trades at ₹601.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas MOLDTKPAC.NS's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check MOLDTKPAC.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while COSMOFIRST.BO trades at ₹734.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas COSMOFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COSMOFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check COSMOFIRST.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.NS has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while COSMOFIRST.NS trades at ₹731.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas COSMOFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COSMOFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check COSMOFIRST.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.NS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HUHTAMAKI.NS trades at ₹185.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HUHTAMAKI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HUHTAMAKI.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.BO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HUHTAMAKI.BO trades at ₹185.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HUHTAMAKI.BO's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HUHTAMAKI.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BOROSCI.NS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BOROSCI.NS trades at ₹117.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BOROSCI.NS's P/E ratio is 64.83. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOROSCI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to BOROSCI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BOROSCI.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ORICONENT.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ORICONENT.BO trades at ₹65.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ORICONENT.BO's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORICONENT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ORICONENT.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ORICONENT.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ORICONENT.NS trades at ₹65.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ORICONENT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORICONENT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ORICONENT.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ARROWGREEN.BO trades at ₹545.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ARROWGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ARROWGREEN.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ARROWGREEN.NS trades at ₹547.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ARROWGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARROWGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ARROWGREEN.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while NAHARPOLY.NS trades at ₹262.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas NAHARPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAHARPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check NAHARPOLY.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while NAHARPOLY.BO trades at ₹258.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas NAHARPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAHARPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check NAHARPOLY.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, COMSYN.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while COMSYN.BO trades at ₹156.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas COMSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COMSYN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to COMSYN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check COMSYN.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SHREERAMA.NS trades at ₹46.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SHREERAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHREERAMA.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SHREERAMA.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SHREERAMA.BO trades at ₹46.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SHREERAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHREERAMA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SHREERAMA.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, COMSYN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while COMSYN.NS trades at ₹155.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas COMSYN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COMSYN.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to COMSYN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check COMSYN.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PYRAMID.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PYRAMID.BO trades at ₹152.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PYRAMID.BO's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PYRAMID.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to PYRAMID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PYRAMID.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PYRAMID.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PYRAMID.NS trades at ₹155.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PYRAMID.NS's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PYRAMID.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to PYRAMID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PYRAMID.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TPLPLASTEH.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TPLPLASTEH.NS trades at ₹67.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TPLPLASTEH.NS's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TPLPLASTEH.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KALYANI.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while KALYANI.BO trades at ₹660.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas KALYANI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KALYANI.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check KALYANI.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while KANPRPLA.NS trades at ₹196.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas KANPRPLA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KANPRPLA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check KANPRPLA.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIRUPATI.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TIRUPATI.NS trades at ₹470.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TIRUPATI.NS's P/E ratio is 33.17. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIRUPATI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUPATI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TIRUPATI.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while KANPRPLA.BO trades at ₹199.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas KANPRPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KANPRPLA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check KANPRPLA.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HALDYNGL.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HALDYNGL.BO trades at ₹103.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HALDYNGL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HALDYNGL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HALDYNGL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HALDYNGL.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BBTCL.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BBTCL.BO trades at ₹200.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BBTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBTCL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to BBTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BBTCL.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BBTCL.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BBTCL.NS trades at ₹199.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BBTCL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBTCL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to BBTCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BBTCL.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RDBRL.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while RDBRL.BO trades at ₹166.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas RDBRL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDBRL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to RDBRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check RDBRL.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SAH.BO trades at ₹106.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SAH.BO's P/E ratio is 368.79. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAH.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to SAH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SAH.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BALAJEE.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BALAJEE.NS trades at ₹32.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BALAJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BALAJEE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to BALAJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BALAJEE.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAH.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SAH.NS trades at ₹104.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SAH.NS's P/E ratio is 361.21. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SAH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SAH.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PGFOILQ.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PGFOILQ.BO trades at ₹215.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PGFOILQ.BO's P/E ratio is -75.04. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGFOILQ.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to PGFOILQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PGFOILQ.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HITECHCORP.NS trades at ₹141.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HITECHCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HITECHCORP.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HITECHCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HITECHCORP.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HITECHCORP.BO trades at ₹139.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HITECHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HITECHCORP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HITECHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HITECHCORP.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while WORTHPERI.NS trades at ₹140.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas WORTHPERI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORTHPERI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check WORTHPERI.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HPBL.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HPBL.BO trades at ₹205.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HPBL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPBL.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HPBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HPBL.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while WORTHPERI.BO trades at ₹141.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas WORTHPERI.BO's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORTHPERI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to WORTHPERI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check WORTHPERI.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AERONEU.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AERONEU.BO trades at ₹80.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AERONEU.BO's P/E ratio is 108.58. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AERONEU.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to AERONEU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AERONEU.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AERONEU.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AERONEU.NS trades at ₹79.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AERONEU.NS's P/E ratio is 108.22. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AERONEU.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to AERONEU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AERONEU.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MEGAFLEX.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while MEGAFLEX.NS trades at ₹152.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas MEGAFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 35.72. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEGAFLEX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to MEGAFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check MEGAFLEX.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WORTH.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while WORTH.BO trades at ₹4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas WORTH.BO's P/E ratio is 78.17. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORTH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to WORTH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check WORTH.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EMMBI.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while EMMBI.BO trades at ₹84.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas EMMBI.BO's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMMBI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to EMMBI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check EMMBI.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EMMBI.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while EMMBI.NS trades at ₹85.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas EMMBI.NS's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMMBI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to EMMBI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check EMMBI.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ECOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ECOPLAST.BO trades at ₹465.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ECOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ECOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ECOPLAST.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EASTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while EASTINDIA.BO trades at ₹105.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas EASTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EASTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to EASTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check EASTINDIA.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BI.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BI.BO trades at ₹61.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BI.BO's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to BI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BI.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KAIRA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while KAIRA.BO trades at ₹1,436.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas KAIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.54. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KAIRA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to KAIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check KAIRA.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RPPL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while RPPL.NS trades at ₹16.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas RPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPPL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to RPPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check RPPL.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HINDTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HINDTIN.BO trades at ₹112.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HINDTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HINDTIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HINDTIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HINDTIN.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CAPRIHANS.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while CAPRIHANS.BO trades at ₹82.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas CAPRIHANS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAPRIHANS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to CAPRIHANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check CAPRIHANS.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BISIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BISIL.BO trades at ₹2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BISIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BISIL.BO's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to BISIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BISIL.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CLARA.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while CLARA.BO trades at ₹41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas CLARA.BO's P/E ratio is 49.29. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLARA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to CLARA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check CLARA.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHETR.BO has a market cap of 999.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SHETR.BO trades at ₹106.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SHETR.BO's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHETR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SHETR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SHETR.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.NS has a market cap of 947.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TOKYOPLAST.NS trades at ₹97.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TOKYOPLAST.NS's P/E ratio is 89.86. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TOKYOPLAST.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BAPACK.BO has a market cap of 932.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BAPACK.BO trades at ₹184.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BAPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAPACK.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to BAPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BAPACK.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 926.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TOKYOPLAST.BO trades at ₹99.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TOKYOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 87.84. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TOKYOPLAST.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GUJCONT.BO has a market cap of 885.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while GUJCONT.BO trades at ₹156.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas GUJCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJCONT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to GUJCONT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check GUJCONT.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMDIND.BO has a market cap of 840.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AMDIND.BO trades at ₹44.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AMDIND.BO's P/E ratio is -15.13. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMDIND.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to AMDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AMDIND.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMDIND.NS has a market cap of 837.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AMDIND.NS trades at ₹44.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AMDIND.NS's P/E ratio is -15.07. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMDIND.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to AMDIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AMDIND.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HINDNATGLS.NS has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HINDNATGLS.NS trades at ₹8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HINDNATGLS.NS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HINDNATGLS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to HINDNATGLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HINDNATGLS.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHALIWIR.BO has a market cap of 786.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SHALIWIR.BO trades at ₹18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SHALIWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHALIWIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SHALIWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SHALIWIR.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.NS has a market cap of 629M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ORIENTLTD.NS trades at ₹62.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ORIENTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -31.61. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ORIENTLTD.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.BO has a market cap of 618.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ORIENTLTD.BO trades at ₹64.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ORIENTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -31.06. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ORIENTLTD.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DKEGL.NS has a market cap of 612.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while DKEGL.NS trades at ₹81.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas DKEGL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DKEGL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to DKEGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check DKEGL.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.NS has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BALKRISHNA.NS trades at ₹18.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BALKRISHNA.NS's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BALKRISHNA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BALKRISHNA.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.BO has a market cap of 586.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BALKRISHNA.BO trades at ₹18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BALKRISHNA.BO's P/E ratio is -9.63. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BALKRISHNA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BALKRISHNA.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PERFEPA.BO has a market cap of 566.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PERFEPA.BO trades at ₹84.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PERFEPA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PERFEPA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to PERFEPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PERFEPA.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, JUMBO.BO has a market cap of 535.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while JUMBO.BO trades at ₹65.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas JUMBO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JUMBO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to JUMBO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check JUMBO.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GUJCRAFT.BO has a market cap of 526M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while GUJCRAFT.BO trades at ₹107.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas GUJCRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJCRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to GUJCRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check GUJCRAFT.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SIEL.BO has a market cap of 458.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SIEL.BO trades at ₹34.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SIEL.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SPL.BO has a market cap of 408.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SPL.BO trades at ₹21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SPL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to SPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SPL.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UMA.NS has a market cap of 392.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while UMA.NS trades at ₹19.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas UMA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UMA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to UMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check UMA.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.BO has a market cap of 366.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PEARLPOLY.BO trades at ₹21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PEARLPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEARLPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PEARLPOLY.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.NS has a market cap of 364.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PEARLPOLY.NS trades at ₹21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PEARLPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEARLPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PEARLPOLY.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RISHITECH.BO has a market cap of 315.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while RISHITECH.BO trades at ₹41.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas RISHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RISHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to RISHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check RISHITECH.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, POLYSPIN.BO has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while POLYSPIN.BO trades at ₹29.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas POLYSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POLYSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to POLYSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check POLYSPIN.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, INNOVTEC.BO has a market cap of 304.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while INNOVTEC.BO trades at ₹13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas INNOVTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -15.57. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INNOVTEC.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to INNOVTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check INNOVTEC.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KSHITIJPOL.NS has a market cap of 255.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while KSHITIJPOL.NS trades at ₹2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas KSHITIJPOL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check KSHITIJPOL.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RCAN.BO has a market cap of 170.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while RCAN.BO trades at ₹15.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas RCAN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to RCAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check RCAN.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRANSFRE.BO has a market cap of 161.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TRANSFRE.BO trades at ₹23.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TRANSFRE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRANSFRE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSFRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TRANSFRE.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ANUROOP.BO has a market cap of 141.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ANUROOP.BO trades at ₹12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ANUROOP.BO's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANUROOP.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to ANUROOP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ANUROOP.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GKP.BO has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while GKP.BO trades at ₹6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas GKP.BO's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GKP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to GKP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check GKP.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ARROWHEAD.BO has a market cap of 138.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ARROWHEAD.BO trades at ₹74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ARROWHEAD.BO's P/E ratio is -34.10. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARROWHEAD.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ARROWHEAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ARROWHEAD.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ANTGRAPHIC.NS has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ANTGRAPHIC.NS trades at ₹0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ANTGRAPHIC.NS's P/E ratio is -29.67. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ANTGRAPHIC.NS's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RAJPACK.BO has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while RAJPACK.BO trades at ₹29.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas RAJPACK.BO's P/E ratio is -1498.50. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAJPACK.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to RAJPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check RAJPACK.BO's competition here

WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, JAUSPOL.BO has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while JAUSPOL.BO trades at ₹28.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas JAUSPOL.BO's P/E ratio is -33.80. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JAUSPOL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to JAUSPOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check JAUSPOL.BO's competition here