TCPL Packaging Limited (TCPLPACK.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCPLPACK.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCPLPACK.BO | ₹2,924.40 | -2.48% | 26.7B | 24.53 | ₹120.08 | +1.01% |
| TIMETECHNO.BO | ₹179.45 | -2.26% | 89.4B | 18.01 | ₹10.05 | +0.69% |
| TIMETECHNO.NS | ₹178.31 | -2.92% | 89.4B | 14.54 | ₹12.45 | +0.69% |
| BORORENEW.BO | ₹623.50 | +0.30% | 87.2B | -126.37 | -₹4.92 | N/A |
| BORORENEW.NS | ₹624.55 | +0.34% | 87.2B | -69.47 | -₹8.95 | N/A |
| EPL.BO | ₹238.10 | +3.12% | 76B | 18.29 | ₹12.97 | +2.11% |
| EPL.NS | ₹237.00 | +2.66% | 76B | 17.70 | ₹13.40 | +2.11% |
| AGI.BO | ₹704.80 | +0.36% | 45.8B | 13.11 | ₹54.00 | +0.99% |
| AGI.NS | ₹703.00 | +0.04% | 45.8B | 13.02 | ₹54.34 | +0.99% |
| MAXVIL.NS | ₹216.00 | -0.09% | 31.8B | 189.47 | ₹1.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TCPLPACK.BO vs TIMETECHNO.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.BO has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while TIMETECHNO.BO trades at ₹179.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas TIMETECHNO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIMETECHNO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs TIMETECHNO.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.NS has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while TIMETECHNO.NS trades at ₹178.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas TIMETECHNO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIMETECHNO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs BORORENEW.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, BORORENEW.BO has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while BORORENEW.BO trades at ₹623.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas BORORENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -126.37. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BORORENEW.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check BORORENEW.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs BORORENEW.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, BORORENEW.NS has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while BORORENEW.NS trades at ₹624.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas BORORENEW.NS's P/E ratio is -69.47. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BORORENEW.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check BORORENEW.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs EPL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, EPL.BO has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while EPL.BO trades at ₹238.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas EPL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EPL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to EPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check EPL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs EPL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, EPL.NS has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while EPL.NS trades at ₹237.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas EPL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EPL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to EPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check EPL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs AGI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, AGI.BO has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while AGI.BO trades at ₹704.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas AGI.BO's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check AGI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs AGI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, AGI.NS has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while AGI.NS trades at ₹703.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas AGI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AGI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check AGI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs MAXVIL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, MAXVIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while MAXVIL.NS trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas MAXVIL.NS's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAXVIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to MAXVIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check MAXVIL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs UFLEX.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, UFLEX.NS has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while UFLEX.NS trades at ₹437.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas UFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check UFLEX.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs UFLEX.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, UFLEX.BO has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while UFLEX.BO trades at ₹437.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas UFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check UFLEX.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs TCPLPACK.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.NS has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while TCPLPACK.NS trades at ₹2,939.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas TCPLPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCPLPACK.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check TCPLPACK.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs MOLDTKPAC.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while MOLDTKPAC.BO trades at ₹688.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas MOLDTKPAC.BO's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs MOLDTKPAC.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while MOLDTKPAC.NS trades at ₹688.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas MOLDTKPAC.NS's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs COSMOFIRST.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while COSMOFIRST.NS trades at ₹860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas COSMOFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COSMOFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs COSMOFIRST.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.BO has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while COSMOFIRST.BO trades at ₹858.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas COSMOFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COSMOFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs HUHTAMAKI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.NS has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while HUHTAMAKI.NS trades at ₹216.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas HUHTAMAKI.NS's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs HUHTAMAKI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.BO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while HUHTAMAKI.BO trades at ₹217.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas HUHTAMAKI.BO's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs BOROSCI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, BOROSCI.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while BOROSCI.NS trades at ₹163.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas BOROSCI.NS's P/E ratio is 42.90. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOROSCI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to BOROSCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check BOROSCI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ARROWGREEN.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ARROWGREEN.NS trades at ₹621.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ARROWGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARROWGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ARROWGREEN.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ARROWGREEN.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ARROWGREEN.BO trades at ₹615.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ARROWGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ARROWGREEN.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ORICONENT.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ORICONENT.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ORICONENT.BO trades at ₹56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ORICONENT.BO's P/E ratio is 158.25. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORICONENT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ORICONENT.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ORICONENT.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ORICONENT.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ORICONENT.NS trades at ₹56.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ORICONENT.NS's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORICONENT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ORICONENT.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs COMSYN.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, COMSYN.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while COMSYN.BO trades at ₹199.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas COMSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COMSYN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to COMSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check COMSYN.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs COMSYN.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, COMSYN.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while COMSYN.NS trades at ₹197.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas COMSYN.NS's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COMSYN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to COMSYN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check COMSYN.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs NRAIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, NRAIL.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while NRAIL.BO trades at ₹421.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas NRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to NRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check NRAIL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs TPLPLASTEH.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, TPLPLASTEH.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while TPLPLASTEH.NS trades at ₹82.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas TPLPLASTEH.NS's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check TPLPLASTEH.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs HALDYNGL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, HALDYNGL.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while HALDYNGL.BO trades at ₹122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas HALDYNGL.BO's P/E ratio is 66.33. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HALDYNGL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to HALDYNGL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check HALDYNGL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs PYRAMID.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, PYRAMID.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while PYRAMID.NS trades at ₹166.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas PYRAMID.NS's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PYRAMID.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check PYRAMID.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs PYRAMID.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, PYRAMID.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while PYRAMID.BO trades at ₹167.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas PYRAMID.BO's P/E ratio is 96.65. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PYRAMID.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check PYRAMID.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs NAHARPOLY.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while NAHARPOLY.NS trades at ₹254.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas NAHARPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAHARPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs NAHARPOLY.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while NAHARPOLY.BO trades at ₹251.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas NAHARPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAHARPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs SHREERAMA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while SHREERAMA.BO trades at ₹46.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas SHREERAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHREERAMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check SHREERAMA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs SHREERAMA.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while SHREERAMA.NS trades at ₹44.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas SHREERAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHREERAMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check SHREERAMA.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs HITECHCORP.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while HITECHCORP.BO trades at ₹319.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas HITECHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HITECHCORP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check HITECHCORP.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs HITECHCORP.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while HITECHCORP.NS trades at ₹318.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas HITECHCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HITECHCORP.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check HITECHCORP.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs KALYANI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, KALYANI.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while KALYANI.BO trades at ₹793.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas KALYANI.BO's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALYANI.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KALYANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check KALYANI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs TIRUPATI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, TIRUPATI.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while TIRUPATI.NS trades at ₹510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas TIRUPATI.NS's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIRUPATI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TIRUPATI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check TIRUPATI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs KANPRPLA.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while KANPRPLA.NS trades at ₹194.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas KANPRPLA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KANPRPLA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check KANPRPLA.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs KANPRPLA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while KANPRPLA.BO trades at ₹194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas KANPRPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KANPRPLA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check KANPRPLA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs BBTCL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, BBTCL.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while BBTCL.NS trades at ₹221.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas BBTCL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBTCL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BBTCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check BBTCL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs BBTCL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, BBTCL.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while BBTCL.BO trades at ₹222.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas BBTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBTCL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BBTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check BBTCL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs SAH.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, SAH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while SAH.BO trades at ₹106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas SAH.BO's P/E ratio is 368.79. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAH.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SAH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check SAH.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs SAH.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, SAH.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while SAH.NS trades at ₹104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas SAH.NS's P/E ratio is 361.21. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SAH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check SAH.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs RDBRL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, RDBRL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while RDBRL.BO trades at ₹153.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas RDBRL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDBRL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to RDBRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check RDBRL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs WORTH.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, WORTH.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while WORTH.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas WORTH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WORTH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to WORTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check WORTH.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs BALAJEE.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, BALAJEE.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while BALAJEE.NS trades at ₹29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas BALAJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BALAJEE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BALAJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check BALAJEE.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs AERONEU.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, AERONEU.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while AERONEU.NS trades at ₹91.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas AERONEU.NS's P/E ratio is 92.40. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AERONEU.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AERONEU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check AERONEU.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs PGFOILQ.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, PGFOILQ.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while PGFOILQ.BO trades at ₹199.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas PGFOILQ.BO's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PGFOILQ.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PGFOILQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check PGFOILQ.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs AERONEU.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, AERONEU.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while AERONEU.BO trades at ₹89.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas AERONEU.BO's P/E ratio is 110.84. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AERONEU.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AERONEU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check AERONEU.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs WORTHPERI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while WORTHPERI.NS trades at ₹136.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas WORTHPERI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WORTHPERI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check WORTHPERI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs HPBL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, HPBL.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while HPBL.BO trades at ₹203.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas HPBL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HPBL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to HPBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check HPBL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs WORTHPERI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while WORTHPERI.BO trades at ₹131.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas WORTHPERI.BO's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WORTHPERI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to WORTHPERI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check WORTHPERI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs EMMBI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, EMMBI.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while EMMBI.BO trades at ₹94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas EMMBI.BO's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMMBI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to EMMBI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check EMMBI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs EMMBI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, EMMBI.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while EMMBI.NS trades at ₹92.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas EMMBI.NS's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMMBI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to EMMBI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check EMMBI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs RPPL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, RPPL.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while RPPL.NS trades at ₹22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas RPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RPPL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to RPPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check RPPL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ECOPLAST.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ECOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ECOPLAST.BO trades at ₹452.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ECOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 74.11. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ECOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ECOPLAST.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs KAIRA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, KAIRA.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while KAIRA.BO trades at ₹1,695.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas KAIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 76.77. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAIRA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KAIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check KAIRA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs EASTINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, EASTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while EASTINDIA.BO trades at ₹101.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas EASTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -2469.50. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EASTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to EASTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check EASTINDIA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs BI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, BI.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while BI.BO trades at ₹58.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas BI.BO's P/E ratio is -215.93. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BI.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to BI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check BI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs WORTH.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, WORTH.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while WORTH.BO trades at ₹3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas WORTH.BO's P/E ratio is 42.11. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WORTH.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to WORTH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check WORTH.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs MEGAFLEX.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, MEGAFLEX.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while MEGAFLEX.NS trades at ₹114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas MEGAFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MEGAFLEX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to MEGAFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check MEGAFLEX.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs CAPRIHANS.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, CAPRIHANS.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while CAPRIHANS.BO trades at ₹76.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas CAPRIHANS.BO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPRIHANS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to CAPRIHANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check CAPRIHANS.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs BISIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, BISIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while BISIL.BO trades at ₹2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas BISIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BISIL.BO's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BISIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check BISIL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs HINDTIN.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, HINDTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while HINDTIN.BO trades at ₹106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas HINDTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HINDTIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HINDTIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check HINDTIN.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs PURVFLEXI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, PURVFLEXI.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while PURVFLEXI.NS trades at ₹50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas PURVFLEXI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PURVFLEXI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to PURVFLEXI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check PURVFLEXI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs AMDIND.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, AMDIND.BO has a market cap of 929.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while AMDIND.BO trades at ₹46.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas AMDIND.BO's P/E ratio is -21.04. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMDIND.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to AMDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check AMDIND.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs AMDIND.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, AMDIND.NS has a market cap of 909.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while AMDIND.NS trades at ₹47.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas AMDIND.NS's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMDIND.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AMDIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check AMDIND.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs SHETR.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, SHETR.BO has a market cap of 902.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while SHETR.BO trades at ₹100.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas SHETR.BO's P/E ratio is 51.15. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHETR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to SHETR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check SHETR.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs CLARA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, CLARA.BO has a market cap of 872.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while CLARA.BO trades at ₹34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas CLARA.BO's P/E ratio is 50.75. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLARA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to CLARA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check CLARA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs BAPACK.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, BAPACK.BO has a market cap of 854.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while BAPACK.BO trades at ₹172.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas BAPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAPACK.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to BAPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check BAPACK.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs TOKYOPLAST.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.NS has a market cap of 846.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while TOKYOPLAST.NS trades at ₹87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas TOKYOPLAST.NS's P/E ratio is 132.96. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs TOKYOPLAST.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 838M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while TOKYOPLAST.BO trades at ₹85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas TOKYOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 131.63. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs GUJCONT.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, GUJCONT.BO has a market cap of 814.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while GUJCONT.BO trades at ₹151.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas GUJCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GUJCONT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to GUJCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check GUJCONT.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs HINDNATGLS.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, HINDNATGLS.NS has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while HINDNATGLS.NS trades at ₹8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas HINDNATGLS.NS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HINDNATGLS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HINDNATGLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check HINDNATGLS.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs SHALIWIR.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, SHALIWIR.BO has a market cap of 764.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while SHALIWIR.BO trades at ₹17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas SHALIWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 48.35. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHALIWIR.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SHALIWIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check SHALIWIR.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ORIENTLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.NS has a market cap of 690M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ORIENTLTD.NS trades at ₹69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ORIENTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -76.53. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIENTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ORIENTLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.BO has a market cap of 659M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ORIENTLTD.BO trades at ₹66.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ORIENTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -56.75. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIENTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ROLLT.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ROLLT.NS has a market cap of 632.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ROLLT.NS trades at ₹2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ROLLT.NS's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROLLT.NS's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ROLLT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ROLLT.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ROLLT.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ROLLT.BO has a market cap of 630.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ROLLT.BO trades at ₹2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ROLLT.BO's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROLLT.BO's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ROLLT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ROLLT.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs DKEGL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, DKEGL.NS has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while DKEGL.NS trades at ₹70.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas DKEGL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DKEGL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to DKEGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check DKEGL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs JUMBO.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, JUMBO.BO has a market cap of 476.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while JUMBO.BO trades at ₹58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas JUMBO.BO's P/E ratio is -157.94. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JUMBO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to JUMBO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check JUMBO.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs GUJCRAFT.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, GUJCRAFT.BO has a market cap of 469.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while GUJCRAFT.BO trades at ₹96.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas GUJCRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 93.31. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GUJCRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to GUJCRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check GUJCRAFT.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs PERFEPA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, PERFEPA.BO has a market cap of 459.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while PERFEPA.BO trades at ₹73.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas PERFEPA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PERFEPA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PERFEPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check PERFEPA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs SPL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, SPL.BO has a market cap of 457.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while SPL.BO trades at ₹23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas SPL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check SPL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs SIEL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, SIEL.BO has a market cap of 431.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while SIEL.BO trades at ₹30.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas SIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIEL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SIEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check SIEL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs TPLPLAST.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, TPLPLAST.BO has a market cap of 410.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while TPLPLAST.BO trades at ₹52.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas TPLPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TPLPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TPLPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check TPLPLAST.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs UMA.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, UMA.NS has a market cap of 364.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while UMA.NS trades at ₹18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas UMA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UMA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to UMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check UMA.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs KSHITIJPOL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, KSHITIJPOL.NS has a market cap of 364.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while KSHITIJPOL.NS trades at ₹3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas KSHITIJPOL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check KSHITIJPOL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs PEARLPOLY.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.BO has a market cap of 321.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while PEARLPOLY.BO trades at ₹18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas PEARLPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEARLPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs PEARLPOLY.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.NS has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while PEARLPOLY.NS trades at ₹17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas PEARLPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEARLPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs RISHITECH.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, RISHITECH.BO has a market cap of 303M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while RISHITECH.BO trades at ₹41.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas RISHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RISHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to RISHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check RISHITECH.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs INNOVTEC.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, INNOVTEC.BO has a market cap of 302.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while INNOVTEC.BO trades at ₹13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas INNOVTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -71.12. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INNOVTEC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to INNOVTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check INNOVTEC.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs POLYSPIN.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, POLYSPIN.BO has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while POLYSPIN.BO trades at ₹27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas POLYSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -17.79. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POLYSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to POLYSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check POLYSPIN.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs RCAN.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, RCAN.BO has a market cap of 192.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while RCAN.BO trades at ₹17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas RCAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RCAN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to RCAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check RCAN.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ASTRON.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ASTRON.BO has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ASTRON.BO trades at ₹3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ASTRON.BO's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTRON.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ASTRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ASTRON.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ASTRON.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ASTRON.NS has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ASTRON.NS trades at ₹3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ASTRON.NS's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTRON.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ASTRON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ASTRON.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs TRANSFRE.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, TRANSFRE.BO has a market cap of 146.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while TRANSFRE.BO trades at ₹20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas TRANSFRE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSFRE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to TRANSFRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check TRANSFRE.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.BO vs ANUROOP.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.BO stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ANUROOP.BO has a market cap of 132.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.BO is priced at ₹2,924.40, while ANUROOP.BO trades at ₹12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.53, whereas ANUROOP.BO's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANUROOP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ANUROOP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.BO.Check ANUROOP.BO's competition here