TCPL Packaging Limited (TCPLPACK.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCPLPACK.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCPLPACK.NS | ₹2,925.00 | -1.74% | 26.9B | 22.70 | ₹130.30 | +1.01% |
| TIMETECHNO.BO | ₹178.05 | -3.02% | 89.4B | 18.01 | ₹10.05 | +0.69% |
| TIMETECHNO.NS | ₹177.84 | -3.18% | 89.4B | 14.54 | ₹12.45 | +0.69% |
| BORORENEW.BO | ₹624.65 | +0.48% | 87.2B | -126.37 | -₹4.92 | N/A |
| BORORENEW.NS | ₹624.85 | +0.39% | 87.2B | -69.47 | -₹8.95 | N/A |
| EPL.BO | ₹237.50 | +2.86% | 76B | 18.29 | ₹12.97 | +2.11% |
| EPL.NS | ₹238.34 | +3.24% | 76B | 17.70 | ₹13.40 | +2.11% |
| AGI.BO | ₹703.90 | +0.23% | 45.8B | 13.11 | ₹54.00 | +0.99% |
| AGI.NS | ₹702.75 | +0.01% | 45.8B | 13.02 | ₹54.34 | +0.99% |
| MAXVIL.NS | ₹216.00 | -0.09% | 31.8B | 189.47 | ₹1.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TCPLPACK.NS vs TIMETECHNO.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.BO has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while TIMETECHNO.BO trades at ₹178.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas TIMETECHNO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIMETECHNO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check TIMETECHNO.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs TIMETECHNO.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.NS has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while TIMETECHNO.NS trades at ₹177.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas TIMETECHNO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIMETECHNO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check TIMETECHNO.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs BORORENEW.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BORORENEW.BO has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while BORORENEW.BO trades at ₹624.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas BORORENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -126.37. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BORORENEW.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to BORORENEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check BORORENEW.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs BORORENEW.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BORORENEW.NS has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while BORORENEW.NS trades at ₹624.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas BORORENEW.NS's P/E ratio is -69.47. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BORORENEW.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check BORORENEW.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs EPL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, EPL.BO has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while EPL.BO trades at ₹237.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas EPL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EPL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to EPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check EPL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs EPL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, EPL.NS has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while EPL.NS trades at ₹238.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas EPL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EPL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to EPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check EPL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs AGI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AGI.BO has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while AGI.BO trades at ₹703.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas AGI.BO's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to AGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check AGI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs AGI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AGI.NS has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while AGI.NS trades at ₹702.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas AGI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to AGI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check AGI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs MAXVIL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, MAXVIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while MAXVIL.NS trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas MAXVIL.NS's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAXVIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to MAXVIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check MAXVIL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs UFLEX.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, UFLEX.NS has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while UFLEX.NS trades at ₹436.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas UFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to UFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check UFLEX.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs UFLEX.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, UFLEX.BO has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while UFLEX.BO trades at ₹436.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas UFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to UFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check UFLEX.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs TCPLPACK.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.BO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while TCPLPACK.BO trades at ₹2,924.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas TCPLPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCPLPACK.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to TCPLPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check TCPLPACK.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs MOLDTKPAC.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while MOLDTKPAC.BO trades at ₹688.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas MOLDTKPAC.BO's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check MOLDTKPAC.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs MOLDTKPAC.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while MOLDTKPAC.NS trades at ₹687.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas MOLDTKPAC.NS's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check MOLDTKPAC.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs COSMOFIRST.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while COSMOFIRST.NS trades at ₹853.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas COSMOFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COSMOFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check COSMOFIRST.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs COSMOFIRST.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.BO has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while COSMOFIRST.BO trades at ₹855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas COSMOFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COSMOFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check COSMOFIRST.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs HUHTAMAKI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.NS has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while HUHTAMAKI.NS trades at ₹217.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas HUHTAMAKI.NS's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check HUHTAMAKI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs HUHTAMAKI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.BO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while HUHTAMAKI.BO trades at ₹216.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas HUHTAMAKI.BO's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check HUHTAMAKI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs BOROSCI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BOROSCI.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while BOROSCI.NS trades at ₹163.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas BOROSCI.NS's P/E ratio is 42.90. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOROSCI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to BOROSCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check BOROSCI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ARROWGREEN.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ARROWGREEN.NS trades at ₹623.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ARROWGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARROWGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ARROWGREEN.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ARROWGREEN.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ARROWGREEN.BO trades at ₹615.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ARROWGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ARROWGREEN.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ORICONENT.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ORICONENT.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ORICONENT.BO trades at ₹56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ORICONENT.BO's P/E ratio is 158.25. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORICONENT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to ORICONENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ORICONENT.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ORICONENT.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ORICONENT.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ORICONENT.NS trades at ₹56.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ORICONENT.NS's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORICONENT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to ORICONENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ORICONENT.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs COMSYN.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, COMSYN.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while COMSYN.BO trades at ₹198.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas COMSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COMSYN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to COMSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check COMSYN.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs COMSYN.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, COMSYN.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while COMSYN.NS trades at ₹193.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas COMSYN.NS's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COMSYN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to COMSYN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check COMSYN.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs NRAIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, NRAIL.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while NRAIL.BO trades at ₹421.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas NRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to NRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check NRAIL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs TPLPLASTEH.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TPLPLASTEH.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while TPLPLASTEH.NS trades at ₹83.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas TPLPLASTEH.NS's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check TPLPLASTEH.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs HALDYNGL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HALDYNGL.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while HALDYNGL.BO trades at ₹122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas HALDYNGL.BO's P/E ratio is 66.33. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HALDYNGL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to HALDYNGL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check HALDYNGL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs PYRAMID.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PYRAMID.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while PYRAMID.NS trades at ₹166.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas PYRAMID.NS's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PYRAMID.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to PYRAMID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check PYRAMID.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs PYRAMID.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PYRAMID.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while PYRAMID.BO trades at ₹167.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas PYRAMID.BO's P/E ratio is 96.65. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PYRAMID.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check PYRAMID.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs NAHARPOLY.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while NAHARPOLY.NS trades at ₹252.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas NAHARPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAHARPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check NAHARPOLY.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs NAHARPOLY.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while NAHARPOLY.BO trades at ₹251.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas NAHARPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAHARPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check NAHARPOLY.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs SHREERAMA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while SHREERAMA.BO trades at ₹44.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas SHREERAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHREERAMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check SHREERAMA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs SHREERAMA.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while SHREERAMA.NS trades at ₹44.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas SHREERAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHREERAMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check SHREERAMA.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs HITECHCORP.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while HITECHCORP.BO trades at ₹319.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas HITECHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HITECHCORP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check HITECHCORP.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs HITECHCORP.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while HITECHCORP.NS trades at ₹318.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas HITECHCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HITECHCORP.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check HITECHCORP.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs KALYANI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KALYANI.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while KALYANI.BO trades at ₹785.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas KALYANI.BO's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALYANI.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to KALYANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check KALYANI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs TIRUPATI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TIRUPATI.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while TIRUPATI.NS trades at ₹510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas TIRUPATI.NS's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIRUPATI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUPATI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check TIRUPATI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs KANPRPLA.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while KANPRPLA.NS trades at ₹194.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas KANPRPLA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KANPRPLA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check KANPRPLA.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs KANPRPLA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while KANPRPLA.BO trades at ₹194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas KANPRPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KANPRPLA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check KANPRPLA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs BBTCL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BBTCL.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while BBTCL.NS trades at ₹220.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas BBTCL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBTCL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to BBTCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check BBTCL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs BBTCL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BBTCL.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while BBTCL.BO trades at ₹222.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas BBTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBTCL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to BBTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check BBTCL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs SAH.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SAH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while SAH.BO trades at ₹106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas SAH.BO's P/E ratio is 368.79. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAH.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to SAH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check SAH.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs SAH.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SAH.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while SAH.NS trades at ₹104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas SAH.NS's P/E ratio is 361.21. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to SAH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check SAH.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs RDBRL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, RDBRL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while RDBRL.BO trades at ₹153.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas RDBRL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDBRL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to RDBRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check RDBRL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs WORTH.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, WORTH.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while WORTH.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas WORTH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WORTH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to WORTH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check WORTH.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs BALAJEE.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BALAJEE.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while BALAJEE.NS trades at ₹29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas BALAJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BALAJEE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to BALAJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check BALAJEE.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs AERONEU.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AERONEU.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while AERONEU.NS trades at ₹89.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas AERONEU.NS's P/E ratio is 92.40. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AERONEU.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to AERONEU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check AERONEU.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs PGFOILQ.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PGFOILQ.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while PGFOILQ.BO trades at ₹200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas PGFOILQ.BO's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PGFOILQ.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to PGFOILQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check PGFOILQ.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs AERONEU.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AERONEU.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while AERONEU.BO trades at ₹89.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas AERONEU.BO's P/E ratio is 110.84. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AERONEU.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to AERONEU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check AERONEU.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs WORTHPERI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while WORTHPERI.NS trades at ₹135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas WORTHPERI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WORTHPERI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to WORTHPERI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check WORTHPERI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs HPBL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HPBL.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while HPBL.BO trades at ₹203.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas HPBL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HPBL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to HPBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check HPBL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs WORTHPERI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while WORTHPERI.BO trades at ₹131.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas WORTHPERI.BO's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WORTHPERI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to WORTHPERI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check WORTHPERI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs EMMBI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, EMMBI.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while EMMBI.BO trades at ₹94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas EMMBI.BO's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMMBI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to EMMBI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check EMMBI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs EMMBI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, EMMBI.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while EMMBI.NS trades at ₹94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas EMMBI.NS's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMMBI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to EMMBI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check EMMBI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs RPPL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, RPPL.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while RPPL.NS trades at ₹22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas RPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RPPL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to RPPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check RPPL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ECOPLAST.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ECOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ECOPLAST.BO trades at ₹452.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ECOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 74.11. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to ECOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ECOPLAST.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs KAIRA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KAIRA.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while KAIRA.BO trades at ₹1,695.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas KAIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 76.77. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAIRA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to KAIRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check KAIRA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs EASTINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, EASTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while EASTINDIA.BO trades at ₹101.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas EASTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -2469.50. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EASTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to EASTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check EASTINDIA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs BI.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BI.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while BI.BO trades at ₹60.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas BI.BO's P/E ratio is -215.93. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BI.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to BI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check BI.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs WORTH.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, WORTH.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while WORTH.BO trades at ₹3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas WORTH.BO's P/E ratio is 42.11. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WORTH.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to WORTH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check WORTH.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs MEGAFLEX.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, MEGAFLEX.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while MEGAFLEX.NS trades at ₹114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas MEGAFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MEGAFLEX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to MEGAFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check MEGAFLEX.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs CAPRIHANS.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CAPRIHANS.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while CAPRIHANS.BO trades at ₹75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas CAPRIHANS.BO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPRIHANS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to CAPRIHANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check CAPRIHANS.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs BISIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BISIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while BISIL.BO trades at ₹2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas BISIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BISIL.BO's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to BISIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check BISIL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs HINDTIN.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HINDTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while HINDTIN.BO trades at ₹106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas HINDTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HINDTIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to HINDTIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check HINDTIN.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs PURVFLEXI.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PURVFLEXI.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while PURVFLEXI.NS trades at ₹50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas PURVFLEXI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PURVFLEXI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to PURVFLEXI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check PURVFLEXI.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs AMDIND.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AMDIND.BO has a market cap of 929.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while AMDIND.BO trades at ₹46.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas AMDIND.BO's P/E ratio is -21.04. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMDIND.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to AMDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check AMDIND.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs AMDIND.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, AMDIND.NS has a market cap of 909.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while AMDIND.NS trades at ₹47.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas AMDIND.NS's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMDIND.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to AMDIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check AMDIND.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs SHETR.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SHETR.BO has a market cap of 902.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while SHETR.BO trades at ₹96.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas SHETR.BO's P/E ratio is 51.15. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHETR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to SHETR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check SHETR.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs CLARA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, CLARA.BO has a market cap of 872.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while CLARA.BO trades at ₹34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas CLARA.BO's P/E ratio is 50.75. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLARA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to CLARA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check CLARA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs BAPACK.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, BAPACK.BO has a market cap of 854.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while BAPACK.BO trades at ₹172.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas BAPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BAPACK.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to BAPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check BAPACK.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs TOKYOPLAST.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.NS has a market cap of 846.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while TOKYOPLAST.NS trades at ₹87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas TOKYOPLAST.NS's P/E ratio is 132.96. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check TOKYOPLAST.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs TOKYOPLAST.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 838M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while TOKYOPLAST.BO trades at ₹85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas TOKYOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 131.63. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check TOKYOPLAST.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs GUJCONT.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, GUJCONT.BO has a market cap of 814.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while GUJCONT.BO trades at ₹151.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas GUJCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GUJCONT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to GUJCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check GUJCONT.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs HINDNATGLS.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, HINDNATGLS.NS has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while HINDNATGLS.NS trades at ₹8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas HINDNATGLS.NS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HINDNATGLS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to HINDNATGLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check HINDNATGLS.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs SHALIWIR.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SHALIWIR.BO has a market cap of 764.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while SHALIWIR.BO trades at ₹17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas SHALIWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 48.35. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHALIWIR.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to SHALIWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check SHALIWIR.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ORIENTLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.NS has a market cap of 690M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ORIENTLTD.NS trades at ₹69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ORIENTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -76.53. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIENTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ORIENTLTD.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ORIENTLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.BO has a market cap of 659M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ORIENTLTD.BO trades at ₹66.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ORIENTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -56.75. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIENTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ORIENTLTD.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ROLLT.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ROLLT.NS has a market cap of 632.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ROLLT.NS trades at ₹2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ROLLT.NS's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROLLT.NS's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to ROLLT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ROLLT.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ROLLT.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ROLLT.BO has a market cap of 630.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ROLLT.BO trades at ₹2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ROLLT.BO's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROLLT.BO's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to ROLLT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ROLLT.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs DKEGL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, DKEGL.NS has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while DKEGL.NS trades at ₹70.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas DKEGL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DKEGL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to DKEGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check DKEGL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs JUMBO.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, JUMBO.BO has a market cap of 476.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while JUMBO.BO trades at ₹57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas JUMBO.BO's P/E ratio is -157.94. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JUMBO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to JUMBO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check JUMBO.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs GUJCRAFT.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, GUJCRAFT.BO has a market cap of 469.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while GUJCRAFT.BO trades at ₹96.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas GUJCRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 93.31. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GUJCRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to GUJCRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check GUJCRAFT.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs PERFEPA.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PERFEPA.BO has a market cap of 459.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while PERFEPA.BO trades at ₹73.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas PERFEPA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PERFEPA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to PERFEPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check PERFEPA.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs SPL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SPL.BO has a market cap of 457.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while SPL.BO trades at ₹23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas SPL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to SPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check SPL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs SIEL.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, SIEL.BO has a market cap of 431.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while SIEL.BO trades at ₹30.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas SIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIEL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to SIEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check SIEL.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs TPLPLAST.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TPLPLAST.BO has a market cap of 410.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while TPLPLAST.BO trades at ₹52.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas TPLPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TPLPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to TPLPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check TPLPLAST.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs UMA.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, UMA.NS has a market cap of 364.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while UMA.NS trades at ₹18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas UMA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UMA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to UMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check UMA.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs KSHITIJPOL.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, KSHITIJPOL.NS has a market cap of 364.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while KSHITIJPOL.NS trades at ₹3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas KSHITIJPOL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check KSHITIJPOL.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs PEARLPOLY.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.BO has a market cap of 321.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while PEARLPOLY.BO trades at ₹18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas PEARLPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEARLPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check PEARLPOLY.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs PEARLPOLY.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.NS has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while PEARLPOLY.NS trades at ₹17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas PEARLPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEARLPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check PEARLPOLY.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs RISHITECH.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, RISHITECH.BO has a market cap of 303M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while RISHITECH.BO trades at ₹41.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas RISHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RISHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to RISHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check RISHITECH.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs INNOVTEC.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, INNOVTEC.BO has a market cap of 302.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while INNOVTEC.BO trades at ₹13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas INNOVTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -71.12. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INNOVTEC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to INNOVTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check INNOVTEC.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs POLYSPIN.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, POLYSPIN.BO has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while POLYSPIN.BO trades at ₹28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas POLYSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -17.79. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POLYSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to POLYSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check POLYSPIN.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs RCAN.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, RCAN.BO has a market cap of 192.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while RCAN.BO trades at ₹17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas RCAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RCAN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to RCAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check RCAN.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ASTRON.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ASTRON.BO has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ASTRON.BO trades at ₹3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ASTRON.BO's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTRON.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ASTRON.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ASTRON.NS Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ASTRON.NS has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ASTRON.NS trades at ₹3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ASTRON.NS's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTRON.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to ASTRON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ASTRON.NS's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs TRANSFRE.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, TRANSFRE.BO has a market cap of 146.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while TRANSFRE.BO trades at ₹20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas TRANSFRE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSFRE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSFRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check TRANSFRE.BO's competition here
TCPLPACK.NS vs ANUROOP.BO Comparison July 2026
TCPLPACK.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCPLPACK.NS stands at 26.9B. In comparison, ANUROOP.BO has a market cap of 132.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCPLPACK.NS is priced at ₹2,925.00, while ANUROOP.BO trades at ₹12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCPLPACK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.70, whereas ANUROOP.BO's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, TCPLPACK.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANUROOP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCPLPACK.NS is less volatile compared to ANUROOP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCPLPACK.NS.Check ANUROOP.BO's competition here