B & A Packaging India Limited (BAPACK.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAPACK.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAPACK.BO | ₹184.70 | +7.20% | 861.9M | 12.21 | ₹14.23 | +0.58% |
| TIMETECHNO.NS | ₹176.11 | -2.72% | 88.2B | 14.35 | ₹12.45 | +0.70% |
| TIMETECHNO.BO | ₹176.45 | -2.51% | 88.1B | 17.79 | ₹10.05 | +0.70% |
| BORORENEW.BO | ₹608.00 | -2.21% | 87.7B | -127.05 | -₹4.92 | N/A |
| BORORENEW.NS | ₹608.85 | -2.07% | 87.7B | -69.84 | -₹8.95 | N/A |
| EPL.NS | ₹245.09 | +3.34% | 77.4B | 18.04 | ₹13.40 | +2.07% |
| EPL.BO | ₹245.45 | +3.46% | 77.3B | 18.61 | ₹12.97 | +2.07% |
| AGI.NS | ₹709.15 | +0.24% | 45.7B | 13.01 | ₹54.34 | +0.99% |
| AGI.BO | ₹710.20 | +0.30% | 45.6B | 13.07 | ₹54.00 | +0.99% |
| MAXVIL.NS | ₹216.00 | -0.09% | 31.8B | 189.47 | ₹1.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BAPACK.BO vs TIMETECHNO.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.NS has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while TIMETECHNO.NS trades at ₹176.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas TIMETECHNO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIMETECHNO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TIMETECHNO.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.BO has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while TIMETECHNO.BO trades at ₹176.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas TIMETECHNO.BO's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIMETECHNO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BORORENEW.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, BORORENEW.BO has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while BORORENEW.BO trades at ₹608.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas BORORENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -127.05. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BORORENEW.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to BORORENEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BORORENEW.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BORORENEW.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, BORORENEW.NS has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while BORORENEW.NS trades at ₹608.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas BORORENEW.NS's P/E ratio is -69.84. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BORORENEW.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to BORORENEW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BORORENEW.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs EPL.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, EPL.NS has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while EPL.NS trades at ₹245.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas EPL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to EPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check EPL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs EPL.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, EPL.BO has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while EPL.BO trades at ₹245.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas EPL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to EPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check EPL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AGI.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, AGI.NS has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while AGI.NS trades at ₹709.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas AGI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AGI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AGI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AGI.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, AGI.BO has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while AGI.BO trades at ₹710.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas AGI.BO's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AGI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs MAXVIL.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, MAXVIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while MAXVIL.NS trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas MAXVIL.NS's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAXVIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to MAXVIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check MAXVIL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs UFLEX.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, UFLEX.BO has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while UFLEX.BO trades at ₹429.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas UFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check UFLEX.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs UFLEX.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, UFLEX.NS has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while UFLEX.NS trades at ₹430.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas UFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check UFLEX.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TCPLPACK.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, TCPLPACK.NS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while TCPLPACK.NS trades at ₹2,909.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas TCPLPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCPLPACK.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to TCPLPACK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TCPLPACK.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TCPLPACK.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, TCPLPACK.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while TCPLPACK.BO trades at ₹2,832.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas TCPLPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCPLPACK.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to TCPLPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TCPLPACK.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs MOLDTKPAC.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.BO has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while MOLDTKPAC.BO trades at ₹695.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas MOLDTKPAC.BO's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs MOLDTKPAC.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.NS has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while MOLDTKPAC.NS trades at ₹695.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas MOLDTKPAC.NS's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs COSMOFIRST.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.BO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while COSMOFIRST.BO trades at ₹851.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas COSMOFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COSMOFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs COSMOFIRST.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.NS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while COSMOFIRST.NS trades at ₹852.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas COSMOFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COSMOFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HUHTAMAKI.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.BO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while HUHTAMAKI.BO trades at ₹213.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas HUHTAMAKI.BO's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HUHTAMAKI.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.NS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while HUHTAMAKI.NS trades at ₹213.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas HUHTAMAKI.NS's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BOROSCI.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, BOROSCI.NS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while BOROSCI.NS trades at ₹161.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas BOROSCI.NS's P/E ratio is 42.13. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOROSCI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to BOROSCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BOROSCI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ARROWGREEN.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while ARROWGREEN.NS trades at ₹663.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ARROWGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARROWGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ARROWGREEN.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ARROWGREEN.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while ARROWGREEN.BO trades at ₹653.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ARROWGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ARROWGREEN.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ORICONENT.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, ORICONENT.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while ORICONENT.NS trades at ₹56.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ORICONENT.NS's P/E ratio is 66.71. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORICONENT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ORICONENT.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ORICONENT.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, ORICONENT.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while ORICONENT.BO trades at ₹56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ORICONENT.BO's P/E ratio is 157.36. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORICONENT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ORICONENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ORICONENT.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs COMSYN.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, COMSYN.NS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while COMSYN.NS trades at ₹191.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas COMSYN.NS's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COMSYN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to COMSYN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check COMSYN.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs COMSYN.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, COMSYN.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while COMSYN.BO trades at ₹192.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas COMSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COMSYN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to COMSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check COMSYN.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs NRAIL.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, NRAIL.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while NRAIL.BO trades at ₹409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas NRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to NRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check NRAIL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HALDYNGL.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, HALDYNGL.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while HALDYNGL.BO trades at ₹123.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas HALDYNGL.BO's P/E ratio is 68.37. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HALDYNGL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HALDYNGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HALDYNGL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TPLPLASTEH.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, TPLPLASTEH.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while TPLPLASTEH.NS trades at ₹81.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas TPLPLASTEH.NS's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TPLPLASTEH.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs NAHARPOLY.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while NAHARPOLY.BO trades at ₹253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas NAHARPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAHARPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs NAHARPOLY.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while NAHARPOLY.NS trades at ₹254.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas NAHARPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAHARPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PYRAMID.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, PYRAMID.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while PYRAMID.BO trades at ₹162.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas PYRAMID.BO's P/E ratio is 94.43. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYRAMID.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PYRAMID.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PYRAMID.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, PYRAMID.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while PYRAMID.NS trades at ₹162.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas PYRAMID.NS's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYRAMID.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to PYRAMID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PYRAMID.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SHREERAMA.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, SHREERAMA.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while SHREERAMA.NS trades at ₹44.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas SHREERAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHREERAMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SHREERAMA.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SHREERAMA.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, SHREERAMA.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while SHREERAMA.BO trades at ₹44.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas SHREERAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHREERAMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SHREERAMA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs KALYANI.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, KALYANI.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while KALYANI.BO trades at ₹755.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas KALYANI.BO's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KALYANI.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to KALYANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check KALYANI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HITECHCORP.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, HITECHCORP.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while HITECHCORP.NS trades at ₹315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas HITECHCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HITECHCORP.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HITECHCORP.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HITECHCORP.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, HITECHCORP.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while HITECHCORP.BO trades at ₹315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas HITECHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 36.01. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HITECHCORP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HITECHCORP.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TIRUPATI.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, TIRUPATI.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while TIRUPATI.NS trades at ₹510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas TIRUPATI.NS's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIRUPATI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TIRUPATI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TIRUPATI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs KANPRPLA.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, KANPRPLA.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while KANPRPLA.NS trades at ₹198.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas KANPRPLA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KANPRPLA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to KANPRPLA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check KANPRPLA.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs KANPRPLA.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, KANPRPLA.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while KANPRPLA.BO trades at ₹197.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas KANPRPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KANPRPLA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to KANPRPLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check KANPRPLA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BBTCL.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, BBTCL.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while BBTCL.NS trades at ₹216.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas BBTCL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBTCL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to BBTCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BBTCL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BBTCL.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, BBTCL.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while BBTCL.BO trades at ₹223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas BBTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBTCL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BBTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BBTCL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SAH.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, SAH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while SAH.BO trades at ₹106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas SAH.BO's P/E ratio is 368.79. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAH.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SAH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SAH.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs RDBRL.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, RDBRL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while RDBRL.BO trades at ₹158.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas RDBRL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RDBRL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to RDBRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check RDBRL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SAH.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, SAH.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while SAH.NS trades at ₹104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas SAH.NS's P/E ratio is 361.21. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to SAH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SAH.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs WORTH.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, WORTH.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while WORTH.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas WORTH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WORTH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to WORTH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check WORTH.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PGFOILQ.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, PGFOILQ.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while PGFOILQ.BO trades at ₹195.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas PGFOILQ.BO's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGFOILQ.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to PGFOILQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PGFOILQ.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BALAJEE.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, BALAJEE.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while BALAJEE.NS trades at ₹28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas BALAJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BALAJEE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to BALAJEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BALAJEE.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AERONEU.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, AERONEU.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while AERONEU.NS trades at ₹88.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas AERONEU.NS's P/E ratio is 89.16. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AERONEU.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to AERONEU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AERONEU.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AERONEU.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, AERONEU.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while AERONEU.BO trades at ₹88.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas AERONEU.BO's P/E ratio is 107.23. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AERONEU.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to AERONEU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AERONEU.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HPBL.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, HPBL.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while HPBL.BO trades at ₹192.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas HPBL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPBL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to HPBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HPBL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs WORTHPERI.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, WORTHPERI.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while WORTHPERI.NS trades at ₹135.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas WORTHPERI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WORTHPERI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to WORTHPERI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check WORTHPERI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs WORTHPERI.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, WORTHPERI.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while WORTHPERI.BO trades at ₹130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas WORTHPERI.BO's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WORTHPERI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check WORTHPERI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs EMMBI.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, EMMBI.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while EMMBI.NS trades at ₹91.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas EMMBI.NS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMMBI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to EMMBI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check EMMBI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs EMMBI.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, EMMBI.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while EMMBI.BO trades at ₹91.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas EMMBI.BO's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMMBI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to EMMBI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check EMMBI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs RPPL.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, RPPL.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while RPPL.NS trades at ₹21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas RPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RPPL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to RPPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check RPPL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ECOPLAST.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, ECOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while ECOPLAST.BO trades at ₹465.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ECOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 74.15. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ECOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ECOPLAST.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs KAIRA.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, KAIRA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while KAIRA.BO trades at ₹1,615.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas KAIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 73.95. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KAIRA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KAIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check KAIRA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BI.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, BI.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while BI.BO trades at ₹62.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas BI.BO's P/E ratio is -221.96. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BI.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to BI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs EASTINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, EASTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while EASTINDIA.BO trades at ₹95.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas EASTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -2394.00. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EASTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to EASTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check EASTINDIA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs MEGAFLEX.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, MEGAFLEX.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while MEGAFLEX.NS trades at ₹108.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas MEGAFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MEGAFLEX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to MEGAFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check MEGAFLEX.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs WORTH.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, WORTH.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while WORTH.BO trades at ₹3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas WORTH.BO's P/E ratio is 41.33. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WORTH.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to WORTH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check WORTH.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BISIL.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, BISIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while BISIL.BO trades at ₹2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas BISIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BISIL.BO's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BISIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BISIL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs CAPRIHANS.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, CAPRIHANS.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while CAPRIHANS.BO trades at ₹74.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas CAPRIHANS.BO's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAPRIHANS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to CAPRIHANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check CAPRIHANS.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HINDTIN.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, HINDTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while HINDTIN.BO trades at ₹104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas HINDTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINDTIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HINDTIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HINDTIN.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PURVFLEXI.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, PURVFLEXI.NS has a market cap of 998.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while PURVFLEXI.NS trades at ₹49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas PURVFLEXI.NS's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PURVFLEXI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to PURVFLEXI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PURVFLEXI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SHETR.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, SHETR.BO has a market cap of 918.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while SHETR.BO trades at ₹101.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas SHETR.BO's P/E ratio is 52.04. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHETR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to SHETR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SHETR.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AMDIND.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, AMDIND.NS has a market cap of 902.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while AMDIND.NS trades at ₹46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas AMDIND.NS's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMDIND.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to AMDIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AMDIND.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AMDIND.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, AMDIND.BO has a market cap of 901.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while AMDIND.BO trades at ₹46.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas AMDIND.BO's P/E ratio is -20.85. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMDIND.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to AMDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AMDIND.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs CLARA.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, CLARA.BO has a market cap of 872.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while CLARA.BO trades at ₹34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas CLARA.BO's P/E ratio is 50.75. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLARA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to CLARA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check CLARA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs GUJCONT.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, GUJCONT.BO has a market cap of 855.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while GUJCONT.BO trades at ₹158.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas GUJCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUJCONT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to GUJCONT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check GUJCONT.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TOKYOPLAST.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.NS has a market cap of 839.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while TOKYOPLAST.NS trades at ₹84.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas TOKYOPLAST.NS's P/E ratio is 131.94. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TOKYOPLAST.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while TOKYOPLAST.BO trades at ₹84.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas TOKYOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 126.87. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HINDNATGLS.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, HINDNATGLS.NS has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while HINDNATGLS.NS trades at ₹8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas HINDNATGLS.NS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINDNATGLS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HINDNATGLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HINDNATGLS.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SHALIWIR.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, SHALIWIR.BO has a market cap of 751.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while SHALIWIR.BO trades at ₹21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas SHALIWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 47.51. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHALIWIR.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to SHALIWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SHALIWIR.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ORIENTLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.NS has a market cap of 690M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while ORIENTLTD.NS trades at ₹67.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ORIENTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -76.53. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORIENTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ORIENTLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.BO has a market cap of 689.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while ORIENTLTD.BO trades at ₹68.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ORIENTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -57.37. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORIENTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ROLLT.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, ROLLT.NS has a market cap of 650.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while ROLLT.NS trades at ₹2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ROLLT.NS's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROLLT.NS's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ROLLT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ROLLT.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ROLLT.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, ROLLT.BO has a market cap of 640.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while ROLLT.BO trades at ₹2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ROLLT.BO's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROLLT.BO's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ROLLT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ROLLT.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs DIKSHA.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, DIKSHA.BO has a market cap of 590.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while DIKSHA.BO trades at ₹112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas DIKSHA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIKSHA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to DIKSHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check DIKSHA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs JUMBO.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, JUMBO.BO has a market cap of 485.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while JUMBO.BO trades at ₹58.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas JUMBO.BO's P/E ratio is -161.11. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JUMBO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to JUMBO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check JUMBO.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs DKEGL.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, DKEGL.NS has a market cap of 473.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while DKEGL.NS trades at ₹63.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas DKEGL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKEGL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to DKEGL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check DKEGL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs GUJCRAFT.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, GUJCRAFT.BO has a market cap of 472.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while GUJCRAFT.BO trades at ₹98.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas GUJCRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 93.83. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUJCRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to GUJCRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check GUJCRAFT.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PERFEPA.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, PERFEPA.BO has a market cap of 469.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while PERFEPA.BO trades at ₹70.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas PERFEPA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PERFEPA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to PERFEPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PERFEPA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SPL.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, SPL.BO has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while SPL.BO trades at ₹21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas SPL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to SPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SPL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SIEL.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, SIEL.BO has a market cap of 427M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while SIEL.BO trades at ₹30.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas SIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIEL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SIEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SIEL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TPLPLAST.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, TPLPLAST.BO has a market cap of 410.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while TPLPLAST.BO trades at ₹52.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas TPLPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPLPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to TPLPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TPLPLAST.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs UMA.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, UMA.NS has a market cap of 364.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while UMA.NS trades at ₹18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas UMA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UMA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to UMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check UMA.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs KSHITIJPOL.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, KSHITIJPOL.NS has a market cap of 347.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while KSHITIJPOL.NS trades at ₹3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas KSHITIJPOL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check KSHITIJPOL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs INNOVTEC.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, INNOVTEC.BO has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while INNOVTEC.BO trades at ₹13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas INNOVTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -73.03. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INNOVTEC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to INNOVTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check INNOVTEC.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PEARLPOLY.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.NS has a market cap of 302.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while PEARLPOLY.NS trades at ₹18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas PEARLPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEARLPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PEARLPOLY.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.BO has a market cap of 302.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while PEARLPOLY.BO trades at ₹17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas PEARLPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEARLPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs RISHITECH.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, RISHITECH.BO has a market cap of 292.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while RISHITECH.BO trades at ₹39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas RISHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RISHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to RISHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check RISHITECH.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs POLYSPIN.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, POLYSPIN.BO has a market cap of 286.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while POLYSPIN.BO trades at ₹29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas POLYSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -17.29. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POLYSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to POLYSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check POLYSPIN.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ASTRON.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, ASTRON.BO has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while ASTRON.BO trades at ₹3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ASTRON.BO's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASTRON.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ASTRON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ASTRON.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs RCAN.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, RCAN.BO has a market cap of 177.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while RCAN.BO trades at ₹16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas RCAN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCAN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to RCAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check RCAN.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ASTRON.NS Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, ASTRON.NS has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while ASTRON.NS trades at ₹3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas ASTRON.NS's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASTRON.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ASTRON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ASTRON.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TRANSFRE.BO Comparison July 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 861.9M. In comparison, TRANSFRE.BO has a market cap of 145.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹184.70, while TRANSFRE.BO trades at ₹20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.21, whereas TRANSFRE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRANSFRE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to TRANSFRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TRANSFRE.BO's competition here