B & A Packaging India Limited (BAPACK.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAPACK.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAPACK.BO | ₹177.60 | +6.32% | 880M | 11.99 | ₹14.79 | +0.56% |
| TIMETECHNO.NS | ₹171.09 | -0.48% | 85B | 17.24 | ₹9.99 | +0.73% |
| TIMETECHNO.BO | ₹171.30 | -0.32% | 84.9B | 17.23 | ₹9.98 | +0.73% |
| BORORENEW.NS | ₹546.65 | +11.12% | 70.3B | 52.89 | ₹9.48 | N/A |
| BORORENEW.BO | ₹546.50 | +11.00% | 70.3B | 53.06 | ₹9.45 | N/A |
| EPL.BO | ₹211.50 | -1.28% | 67.4B | 17.36 | ₹12.12 | +2.38% |
| EPL.NS | ₹211.65 | -1.02% | 67.4B | 17.33 | ₹12.14 | +2.38% |
| AGI.NS | ₹608.80 | +1.70% | 39.6B | 11.25 | ₹54.33 | +1.15% |
| AGI.BO | ₹607.75 | +1.38% | 39.5B | 11.23 | ₹54.35 | +1.15% |
| UFLEX.BO | ₹440.00 | +0.15% | 32.4B | 8.30 | ₹54.04 | +0.67% |
Stock Comparison
BAPACK.BO vs TIMETECHNO.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.NS has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while TIMETECHNO.NS trades at ₹171.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TIMETECHNO.NS's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIMETECHNO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TIMETECHNO.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.BO has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while TIMETECHNO.BO trades at ₹171.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TIMETECHNO.BO's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIMETECHNO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BORORENEW.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, BORORENEW.NS has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while BORORENEW.NS trades at ₹546.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas BORORENEW.NS's P/E ratio is 52.89. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BORORENEW.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BORORENEW.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BORORENEW.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, BORORENEW.BO has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while BORORENEW.BO trades at ₹546.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas BORORENEW.BO's P/E ratio is 53.06. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BORORENEW.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BORORENEW.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs EPL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, EPL.BO has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while EPL.BO trades at ₹211.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas EPL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to EPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check EPL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs EPL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, EPL.NS has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while EPL.NS trades at ₹211.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas EPL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to EPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check EPL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AGI.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, AGI.NS has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while AGI.NS trades at ₹608.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas AGI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AGI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AGI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AGI.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, AGI.BO has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while AGI.BO trades at ₹607.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas AGI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AGI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs UFLEX.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, UFLEX.BO has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while UFLEX.BO trades at ₹440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas UFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check UFLEX.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs UFLEX.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, UFLEX.NS has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while UFLEX.NS trades at ₹440.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas UFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check UFLEX.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs MAXVIL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, MAXVIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while MAXVIL.NS trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas MAXVIL.NS's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAXVIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to MAXVIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check MAXVIL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs MOLDTKPAC.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.NS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while MOLDTKPAC.NS trades at ₹703.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas MOLDTKPAC.NS's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs MOLDTKPAC.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.BO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while MOLDTKPAC.BO trades at ₹706.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas MOLDTKPAC.BO's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TCPLPACK.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, TCPLPACK.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while TCPLPACK.NS trades at ₹2,570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TCPLPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCPLPACK.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TCPLPACK.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TCPLPACK.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, TCPLPACK.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while TCPLPACK.BO trades at ₹2,534.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TCPLPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCPLPACK.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TCPLPACK.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs COSMOFIRST.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.BO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while COSMOFIRST.BO trades at ₹742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas COSMOFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COSMOFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs COSMOFIRST.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.NS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while COSMOFIRST.NS trades at ₹742.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas COSMOFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COSMOFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BOROSCI.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, BOROSCI.NS has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while BOROSCI.NS trades at ₹155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas BOROSCI.NS's P/E ratio is 83.69. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOROSCI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BOROSCI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BOROSCI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HUHTAMAKI.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while HUHTAMAKI.BO trades at ₹165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas HUHTAMAKI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HUHTAMAKI.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while HUHTAMAKI.NS trades at ₹166.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas HUHTAMAKI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ORICONENT.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, ORICONENT.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while ORICONENT.NS trades at ₹60.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ORICONENT.NS's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORICONENT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ORICONENT.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ORICONENT.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, ORICONENT.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while ORICONENT.BO trades at ₹60.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ORICONENT.BO's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORICONENT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ORICONENT.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ARROWGREEN.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.NS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while ARROWGREEN.NS trades at ₹555.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ARROWGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARROWGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ARROWGREEN.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ARROWGREEN.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while ARROWGREEN.BO trades at ₹550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ARROWGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ARROWGREEN.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs NAHARPOLY.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while NAHARPOLY.BO trades at ₹253.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas NAHARPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAHARPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs NAHARPOLY.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while NAHARPOLY.NS trades at ₹251.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas NAHARPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAHARPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs COMSYN.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, COMSYN.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while COMSYN.BO trades at ₹153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas COMSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COMSYN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to COMSYN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check COMSYN.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SHREERAMA.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, SHREERAMA.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while SHREERAMA.BO trades at ₹45.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas SHREERAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHREERAMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SHREERAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SHREERAMA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs COMSYN.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, COMSYN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while COMSYN.NS trades at ₹153.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas COMSYN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COMSYN.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to COMSYN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check COMSYN.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SHREERAMA.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, SHREERAMA.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while SHREERAMA.NS trades at ₹44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas SHREERAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHREERAMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SHREERAMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SHREERAMA.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PYRAMID.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, PYRAMID.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while PYRAMID.NS trades at ₹165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PYRAMID.NS's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PYRAMID.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PYRAMID.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PYRAMID.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, PYRAMID.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while PYRAMID.BO trades at ₹164.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PYRAMID.BO's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PYRAMID.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PYRAMID.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HALDYNGL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, HALDYNGL.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while HALDYNGL.BO trades at ₹112.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas HALDYNGL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HALDYNGL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HALDYNGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HALDYNGL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TPLPLASTEH.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, TPLPLASTEH.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while TPLPLASTEH.NS trades at ₹69.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TPLPLASTEH.NS's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TPLPLASTEH.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TIRUPATI.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, TIRUPATI.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while TIRUPATI.NS trades at ₹485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TIRUPATI.NS's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIRUPATI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TIRUPATI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TIRUPATI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HITECHCORP.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, HITECHCORP.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while HITECHCORP.BO trades at ₹294.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas HITECHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HITECHCORP.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HITECHCORP.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HITECHCORP.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, HITECHCORP.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while HITECHCORP.NS trades at ₹293.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas HITECHCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HITECHCORP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HITECHCORP.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs KANPRPLA.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, KANPRPLA.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while KANPRPLA.BO trades at ₹191.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas KANPRPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KANPRPLA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check KANPRPLA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs KANPRPLA.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, KANPRPLA.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while KANPRPLA.NS trades at ₹187.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas KANPRPLA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KANPRPLA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check KANPRPLA.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BBTCL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, BBTCL.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while BBTCL.BO trades at ₹200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas BBTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBTCL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BBTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BBTCL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BBTCL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, BBTCL.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while BBTCL.NS trades at ₹205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas BBTCL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBTCL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BBTCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BBTCL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs KALYANI.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, KALYANI.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while KALYANI.BO trades at ₹569.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas KALYANI.BO's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KALYANI.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KALYANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check KALYANI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SAH.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, SAH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while SAH.BO trades at ₹106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas SAH.BO's P/E ratio is 368.79. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAH.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SAH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SAH.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SAH.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, SAH.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while SAH.NS trades at ₹104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas SAH.NS's P/E ratio is 361.21. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SAH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SAH.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HPBL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, HPBL.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while HPBL.BO trades at ₹246.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas HPBL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPBL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HPBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HPBL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs RDBRL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, RDBRL.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while RDBRL.BO trades at ₹146.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas RDBRL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDBRL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to RDBRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check RDBRL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs WORTH.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, WORTH.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while WORTH.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas WORTH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORTH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to WORTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check WORTH.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PGFOILQ.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, PGFOILQ.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while PGFOILQ.BO trades at ₹198.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PGFOILQ.BO's P/E ratio is -72.61. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGFOILQ.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PGFOILQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PGFOILQ.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BALAJEE.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, BALAJEE.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while BALAJEE.NS trades at ₹28.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas BALAJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BALAJEE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BALAJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BALAJEE.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AERONEU.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, AERONEU.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while AERONEU.NS trades at ₹87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas AERONEU.NS's P/E ratio is 154.68. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AERONEU.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AERONEU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AERONEU.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AERONEU.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, AERONEU.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while AERONEU.BO trades at ₹87.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas AERONEU.BO's P/E ratio is 152.77. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AERONEU.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AERONEU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AERONEU.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs WORTHPERI.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, WORTHPERI.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while WORTHPERI.BO trades at ₹126.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas WORTHPERI.BO's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORTHPERI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check WORTHPERI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs WORTHPERI.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, WORTHPERI.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while WORTHPERI.NS trades at ₹128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas WORTHPERI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORTHPERI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check WORTHPERI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs EMMBI.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, EMMBI.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while EMMBI.BO trades at ₹82.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas EMMBI.BO's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMMBI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to EMMBI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check EMMBI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs EMMBI.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, EMMBI.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while EMMBI.NS trades at ₹83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas EMMBI.NS's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMMBI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to EMMBI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check EMMBI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ECOPLAST.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, ECOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while ECOPLAST.BO trades at ₹476.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ECOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ECOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ECOPLAST.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs EASTINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, EASTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while EASTINDIA.BO trades at ₹104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas EASTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 33.34. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EASTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to EASTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check EASTINDIA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs WORTH.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, WORTH.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while WORTH.BO trades at ₹4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas WORTH.BO's P/E ratio is 71.50. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORTH.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to WORTH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check WORTH.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BI.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, BI.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while BI.BO trades at ₹64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas BI.BO's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BI.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BI.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs MEGAFLEX.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, MEGAFLEX.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while MEGAFLEX.NS trades at ₹126.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas MEGAFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEGAFLEX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to MEGAFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check MEGAFLEX.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs RPPL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, RPPL.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while RPPL.NS trades at ₹18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas RPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPPL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to RPPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check RPPL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs KAIRA.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, KAIRA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while KAIRA.BO trades at ₹1,333.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas KAIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 71.82. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KAIRA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KAIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check KAIRA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs CAPRIHANS.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, CAPRIHANS.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while CAPRIHANS.BO trades at ₹80.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas CAPRIHANS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAPRIHANS.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to CAPRIHANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check CAPRIHANS.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BISIL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, BISIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while BISIL.BO trades at ₹2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas BISIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BISIL.BO's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BISIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BISIL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HINDTIN.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, HINDTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while HINDTIN.BO trades at ₹106.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas HINDTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HINDTIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HINDTIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HINDTIN.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PURVFLEXI.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, PURVFLEXI.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while PURVFLEXI.NS trades at ₹52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PURVFLEXI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PURVFLEXI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PURVFLEXI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PURVFLEXI.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs CLARA.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, CLARA.BO has a market cap of 962.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while CLARA.BO trades at ₹37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas CLARA.BO's P/E ratio is 44.64. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLARA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to CLARA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check CLARA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs GUJCONT.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, GUJCONT.BO has a market cap of 943.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while GUJCONT.BO trades at ₹167.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas GUJCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJCONT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to GUJCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check GUJCONT.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AMDIND.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, AMDIND.BO has a market cap of 939.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while AMDIND.BO trades at ₹49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas AMDIND.BO's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMDIND.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AMDIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AMDIND.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs AMDIND.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, AMDIND.NS has a market cap of 938M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while AMDIND.NS trades at ₹49.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas AMDIND.NS's P/E ratio is -16.88. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMDIND.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to AMDIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check AMDIND.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SHETR.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, SHETR.BO has a market cap of 830.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while SHETR.BO trades at ₹89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas SHETR.BO's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHETR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SHETR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SHETR.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TOKYOPLAST.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.NS has a market cap of 817.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while TOKYOPLAST.NS trades at ₹85.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TOKYOPLAST.NS's P/E ratio is 130.30. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TOKYOPLAST.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while TOKYOPLAST.BO trades at ₹83.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TOKYOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 75.55. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs HINDNATGLS.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, HINDNATGLS.NS has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while HINDNATGLS.NS trades at ₹8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas HINDNATGLS.NS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HINDNATGLS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to HINDNATGLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check HINDNATGLS.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SHALIWIR.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, SHALIWIR.BO has a market cap of 758M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while SHALIWIR.BO trades at ₹17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas SHALIWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHALIWIR.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SHALIWIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SHALIWIR.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ORIENTLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.BO has a market cap of 621.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while ORIENTLTD.BO trades at ₹58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ORIENTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -31.22. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ORIENTLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.NS has a market cap of 614.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while ORIENTLTD.NS trades at ₹59.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ORIENTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -30.89. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BALKRISHNA.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.BO has a market cap of 593.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while BALKRISHNA.BO trades at ₹18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas BALKRISHNA.BO's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BALKRISHNA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BALKRISHNA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs BALKRISHNA.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.NS has a market cap of 586.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while BALKRISHNA.NS trades at ₹18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas BALKRISHNA.NS's P/E ratio is -9.63. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BALKRISHNA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check BALKRISHNA.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs DKEGL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, DKEGL.NS has a market cap of 523.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while DKEGL.NS trades at ₹65.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas DKEGL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DKEGL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to DKEGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check DKEGL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PERFEPA.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, PERFEPA.BO has a market cap of 505.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while PERFEPA.BO trades at ₹73.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PERFEPA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PERFEPA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PERFEPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PERFEPA.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs GUJCRAFT.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, GUJCRAFT.BO has a market cap of 487.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while GUJCRAFT.BO trades at ₹98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas GUJCRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 50.33. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJCRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to GUJCRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check GUJCRAFT.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs JUMBO.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, JUMBO.BO has a market cap of 482.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while JUMBO.BO trades at ₹57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas JUMBO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JUMBO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to JUMBO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check JUMBO.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs KSHITIJPOL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, KSHITIJPOL.NS has a market cap of 461.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while KSHITIJPOL.NS trades at ₹5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas KSHITIJPOL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check KSHITIJPOL.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SPL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, SPL.BO has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while SPL.BO trades at ₹22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas SPL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SPL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs SIEL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, SIEL.BO has a market cap of 423.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while SIEL.BO trades at ₹32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas SIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIEL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to SIEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check SIEL.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs UMA.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, UMA.NS has a market cap of 400.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while UMA.NS trades at ₹19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas UMA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UMA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to UMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check UMA.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PEARLPOLY.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.BO has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while PEARLPOLY.BO trades at ₹18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PEARLPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEARLPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs PEARLPOLY.NS Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.NS has a market cap of 313M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while PEARLPOLY.NS trades at ₹19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas PEARLPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEARLPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.NS's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs INNOVTEC.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, INNOVTEC.BO has a market cap of 308.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while INNOVTEC.BO trades at ₹13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas INNOVTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INNOVTEC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to INNOVTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check INNOVTEC.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs POLYSPIN.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, POLYSPIN.BO has a market cap of 300.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while POLYSPIN.BO trades at ₹30.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas POLYSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POLYSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to POLYSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check POLYSPIN.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs RISHITECH.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, RISHITECH.BO has a market cap of 286M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while RISHITECH.BO trades at ₹35.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas RISHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RISHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to RISHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check RISHITECH.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs RCAN.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, RCAN.BO has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while RCAN.BO trades at ₹18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas RCAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to RCAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check RCAN.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ANUROOP.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, ANUROOP.BO has a market cap of 163.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while ANUROOP.BO trades at ₹14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ANUROOP.BO's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANUROOP.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ANUROOP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ANUROOP.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TRANSFRE.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, TRANSFRE.BO has a market cap of 161.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while TRANSFRE.BO trades at ₹22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TRANSFRE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRANSFRE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TRANSFRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TRANSFRE.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs TIRTPLS.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, TIRTPLS.BO has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while TIRTPLS.BO trades at ₹32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas TIRTPLS.BO's P/E ratio is 66.42. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIRTPLS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to TIRTPLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check TIRTPLS.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs ARROWHEAD.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, ARROWHEAD.BO has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while ARROWHEAD.BO trades at ₹73.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas ARROWHEAD.BO's P/E ratio is -34.56. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARROWHEAD.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWHEAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check ARROWHEAD.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs RAJPACK.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, RAJPACK.BO has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while RAJPACK.BO trades at ₹30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas RAJPACK.BO's P/E ratio is -1520.00. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAJPACK.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to RAJPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check RAJPACK.BO's competition here
BAPACK.BO vs GKP.BO Comparison June 2026
BAPACK.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAPACK.BO stands at 880M. In comparison, GKP.BO has a market cap of 138.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BAPACK.BO is priced at ₹177.60, while GKP.BO trades at ₹6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAPACK.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.99, whereas GKP.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, BAPACK.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GKP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAPACK.BO is more volatile compared to GKP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAPACK.BO.Check GKP.BO's competition here