Uflex Limited (UFLEX.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UFLEX.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFLEX.NS | ₹440.65 | +7.50% | 30.6B | 10.56 | ₹40.13 | +0.71% |
| TIMETECHNO.BO | ₹171.85 | -4.98% | 86.3B | 17.49 | ₹9.99 | +0.72% |
| TIMETECHNO.NS | ₹171.92 | -4.39% | 86.2B | 17.47 | ₹10.00 | +0.72% |
| BORORENEW.NS | ₹491.95 | -3.08% | 70.4B | 52.93 | ₹9.48 | N/A |
| BORORENEW.BO | ₹492.35 | -3.12% | 70.1B | 52.93 | ₹9.45 | N/A |
| EPL.BO | ₹214.25 | -0.56% | 68.6B | 17.65 | ₹12.13 | +2.34% |
| EPL.NS | ₹213.83 | -0.72% | 68.4B | 17.60 | ₹12.14 | +2.34% |
| AGI.NS | ₹598.65 | +2.01% | 38.2B | 10.85 | ₹54.35 | +1.19% |
| AGI.BO | ₹599.45 | +2.03% | 38.1B | 10.84 | ₹54.38 | +1.19% |
| MAXVIL.NS | ₹216.00 | -0.09% | 31.8B | 189.47 | ₹1.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UFLEX.NS vs TIMETECHNO.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.BO has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while TIMETECHNO.BO trades at ₹171.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas TIMETECHNO.BO's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIMETECHNO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check TIMETECHNO.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs TIMETECHNO.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.NS has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while TIMETECHNO.NS trades at ₹171.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas TIMETECHNO.NS's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIMETECHNO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check TIMETECHNO.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs BORORENEW.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BORORENEW.NS has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while BORORENEW.NS trades at ₹491.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BORORENEW.NS's P/E ratio is 52.93. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BORORENEW.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check BORORENEW.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs BORORENEW.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BORORENEW.BO has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while BORORENEW.BO trades at ₹492.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BORORENEW.BO's P/E ratio is 52.93. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BORORENEW.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check BORORENEW.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs EPL.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, EPL.BO has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while EPL.BO trades at ₹214.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas EPL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to EPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check EPL.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs EPL.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, EPL.NS has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while EPL.NS trades at ₹213.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas EPL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to EPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check EPL.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs AGI.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, AGI.NS has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while AGI.NS trades at ₹598.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas AGI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to AGI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check AGI.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs AGI.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, AGI.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while AGI.BO trades at ₹599.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas AGI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to AGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check AGI.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs MAXVIL.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, MAXVIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while MAXVIL.NS trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas MAXVIL.NS's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAXVIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to MAXVIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check MAXVIL.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs UFLEX.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, UFLEX.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while UFLEX.BO trades at ₹439.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas UFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is less volatile compared to UFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check UFLEX.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs MOLDTKPAC.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.NS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while MOLDTKPAC.NS trades at ₹690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas MOLDTKPAC.NS's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check MOLDTKPAC.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs MOLDTKPAC.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.BO has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while MOLDTKPAC.BO trades at ₹693.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas MOLDTKPAC.BO's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check MOLDTKPAC.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs TCPLPACK.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.BO has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while TCPLPACK.BO trades at ₹2,601.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas TCPLPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TCPLPACK.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check TCPLPACK.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs TCPLPACK.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.NS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while TCPLPACK.NS trades at ₹2,577.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas TCPLPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TCPLPACK.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check TCPLPACK.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs COSMOFIRST.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while COSMOFIRST.BO trades at ₹716.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas COSMOFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COSMOFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check COSMOFIRST.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs COSMOFIRST.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while COSMOFIRST.NS trades at ₹716.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas COSMOFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COSMOFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check COSMOFIRST.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs BOROSCI.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BOROSCI.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while BOROSCI.NS trades at ₹150.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BOROSCI.NS's P/E ratio is 82.88. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BOROSCI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to BOROSCI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check BOROSCI.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs HUHTAMAKI.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while HUHTAMAKI.BO trades at ₹158.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas HUHTAMAKI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check HUHTAMAKI.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs HUHTAMAKI.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while HUHTAMAKI.NS trades at ₹160.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas HUHTAMAKI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check HUHTAMAKI.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs ORICONENT.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, ORICONENT.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while ORICONENT.NS trades at ₹61.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas ORICONENT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORICONENT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check ORICONENT.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs ORICONENT.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, ORICONENT.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while ORICONENT.BO trades at ₹61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas ORICONENT.BO's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORICONENT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is less volatile compared to ORICONENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check ORICONENT.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs ARROWGREEN.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while ARROWGREEN.NS trades at ₹545.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas ARROWGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARROWGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check ARROWGREEN.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs ARROWGREEN.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while ARROWGREEN.BO trades at ₹545.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas ARROWGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check ARROWGREEN.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs NAHARPOLY.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while NAHARPOLY.BO trades at ₹255.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas NAHARPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NAHARPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check NAHARPOLY.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs NAHARPOLY.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while NAHARPOLY.NS trades at ₹255.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas NAHARPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NAHARPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check NAHARPOLY.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs COMSYN.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, COMSYN.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while COMSYN.BO trades at ₹153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas COMSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COMSYN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to COMSYN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check COMSYN.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs COMSYN.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, COMSYN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while COMSYN.NS trades at ₹153.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas COMSYN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COMSYN.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to COMSYN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check COMSYN.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs HALDYNGL.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, HALDYNGL.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while HALDYNGL.BO trades at ₹110.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas HALDYNGL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HALDYNGL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to HALDYNGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check HALDYNGL.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs PYRAMID.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, PYRAMID.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while PYRAMID.BO trades at ₹161.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas PYRAMID.BO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PYRAMID.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check PYRAMID.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs PYRAMID.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, PYRAMID.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while PYRAMID.NS trades at ₹161.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas PYRAMID.NS's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PYRAMID.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check PYRAMID.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs SHREERAMA.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while SHREERAMA.BO trades at ₹46.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas SHREERAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHREERAMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check SHREERAMA.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs SHREERAMA.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while SHREERAMA.NS trades at ₹46.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas SHREERAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHREERAMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to SHREERAMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check SHREERAMA.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs TPLPLASTEH.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, TPLPLASTEH.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while TPLPLASTEH.NS trades at ₹69.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas TPLPLASTEH.NS's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check TPLPLASTEH.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs KANPRPLA.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while KANPRPLA.BO trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas KANPRPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KANPRPLA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check KANPRPLA.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs KANPRPLA.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while KANPRPLA.NS trades at ₹192.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas KANPRPLA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KANPRPLA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check KANPRPLA.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs TIRUPATI.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, TIRUPATI.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while TIRUPATI.NS trades at ₹485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas TIRUPATI.NS's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIRUPATI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUPATI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check TIRUPATI.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs BBTCL.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BBTCL.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while BBTCL.NS trades at ₹225.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BBTCL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BBTCL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to BBTCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check BBTCL.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs BBTCL.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BBTCL.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while BBTCL.BO trades at ₹224.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BBTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BBTCL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to BBTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check BBTCL.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs KALYANI.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, KALYANI.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while KALYANI.BO trades at ₹605.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas KALYANI.BO's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KALYANI.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check KALYANI.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs HITECHCORP.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while HITECHCORP.BO trades at ₹267.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas HITECHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HITECHCORP.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check HITECHCORP.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs HITECHCORP.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while HITECHCORP.NS trades at ₹266.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas HITECHCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HITECHCORP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check HITECHCORP.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs SAH.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SAH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while SAH.BO trades at ₹106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas SAH.BO's P/E ratio is 368.79. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAH.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to SAH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check SAH.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs SAH.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SAH.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while SAH.NS trades at ₹104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas SAH.NS's P/E ratio is 361.21. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to SAH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check SAH.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs HPBL.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, HPBL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while HPBL.BO trades at ₹250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas HPBL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HPBL.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to HPBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check HPBL.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs PGFOILQ.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, PGFOILQ.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while PGFOILQ.BO trades at ₹206.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas PGFOILQ.BO's P/E ratio is -75.76. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGFOILQ.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to PGFOILQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check PGFOILQ.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs WORTH.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, WORTH.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while WORTH.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas WORTH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WORTH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to WORTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check WORTH.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs RDBRL.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, RDBRL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while RDBRL.BO trades at ₹145.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas RDBRL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDBRL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to RDBRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check RDBRL.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs BALAJEE.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BALAJEE.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while BALAJEE.NS trades at ₹30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BALAJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BALAJEE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to BALAJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check BALAJEE.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs AERONEU.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, AERONEU.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while AERONEU.NS trades at ₹88.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas AERONEU.NS's P/E ratio is 157.88. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AERONEU.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to AERONEU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check AERONEU.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs AERONEU.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, AERONEU.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while AERONEU.BO trades at ₹86.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas AERONEU.BO's P/E ratio is 157.47. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AERONEU.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is less volatile compared to AERONEU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check AERONEU.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs WORTHPERI.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while WORTHPERI.BO trades at ₹129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas WORTHPERI.BO's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WORTHPERI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check WORTHPERI.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs WORTHPERI.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while WORTHPERI.NS trades at ₹128.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas WORTHPERI.NS's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WORTHPERI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check WORTHPERI.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs EASTINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, EASTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while EASTINDIA.BO trades at ₹112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas EASTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EASTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to EASTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check EASTINDIA.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs WORTH.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, WORTH.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while WORTH.BO trades at ₹4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas WORTH.BO's P/E ratio is 74.17. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WORTH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to WORTH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check WORTH.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs MEGAFLEX.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, MEGAFLEX.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while MEGAFLEX.NS trades at ₹126.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas MEGAFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 31.36. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MEGAFLEX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to MEGAFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check MEGAFLEX.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs EMMBI.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, EMMBI.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while EMMBI.BO trades at ₹84.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas EMMBI.BO's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMMBI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to EMMBI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check EMMBI.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs EMMBI.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, EMMBI.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while EMMBI.NS trades at ₹84.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas EMMBI.NS's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMMBI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to EMMBI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check EMMBI.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs ECOPLAST.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, ECOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while ECOPLAST.BO trades at ₹484.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas ECOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ECOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to ECOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check ECOPLAST.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs BI.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BI.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while BI.BO trades at ₹63.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BI.BO's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is less volatile compared to BI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check BI.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs RPPL.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, RPPL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while RPPL.NS trades at ₹18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas RPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RPPL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is less volatile compared to RPPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check RPPL.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs KAIRA.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, KAIRA.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while KAIRA.BO trades at ₹1,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas KAIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAIRA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to KAIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check KAIRA.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs BISIL.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BISIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while BISIL.BO trades at ₹2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BISIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BISIL.BO's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to BISIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check BISIL.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs PURVFLEXI.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, PURVFLEXI.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while PURVFLEXI.NS trades at ₹52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas PURVFLEXI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PURVFLEXI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to PURVFLEXI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check PURVFLEXI.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs HINDTIN.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, HINDTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while HINDTIN.BO trades at ₹106.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas HINDTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HINDTIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to HINDTIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check HINDTIN.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs CAPRIHANS.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, CAPRIHANS.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while CAPRIHANS.BO trades at ₹76.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas CAPRIHANS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAPRIHANS.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to CAPRIHANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check CAPRIHANS.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs CLARA.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, CLARA.BO has a market cap of 962.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while CLARA.BO trades at ₹37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas CLARA.BO's P/E ratio is 44.12. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLARA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is less volatile compared to CLARA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check CLARA.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs GUJCONT.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, GUJCONT.BO has a market cap of 943.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while GUJCONT.BO trades at ₹167.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas GUJCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GUJCONT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to GUJCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check GUJCONT.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs SHETR.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SHETR.BO has a market cap of 903M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while SHETR.BO trades at ₹95.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas SHETR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHETR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to SHETR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check SHETR.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs AMDIND.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, AMDIND.NS has a market cap of 882.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while AMDIND.NS trades at ₹47.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas AMDIND.NS's P/E ratio is -15.88. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMDIND.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to AMDIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check AMDIND.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs AMDIND.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, AMDIND.BO has a market cap of 868.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while AMDIND.BO trades at ₹47.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas AMDIND.BO's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMDIND.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to AMDIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check AMDIND.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs BAPACK.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BAPACK.BO has a market cap of 864.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while BAPACK.BO trades at ₹171.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BAPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BAPACK.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to BAPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check BAPACK.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs TOKYOPLAST.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.NS has a market cap of 836.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while TOKYOPLAST.NS trades at ₹86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas TOKYOPLAST.NS's P/E ratio is 133.35. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check TOKYOPLAST.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs TOKYOPLAST.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 833.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while TOKYOPLAST.BO trades at ₹87.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas TOKYOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 79.05. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check TOKYOPLAST.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs SHALIWIR.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SHALIWIR.BO has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while SHALIWIR.BO trades at ₹17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas SHALIWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHALIWIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is less volatile compared to SHALIWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check SHALIWIR.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs HINDNATGLS.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, HINDNATGLS.NS has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while HINDNATGLS.NS trades at ₹8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas HINDNATGLS.NS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HINDNATGLS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to HINDNATGLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check HINDNATGLS.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs ORIENTLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.NS has a market cap of 620M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while ORIENTLTD.NS trades at ₹62.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas ORIENTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -31.16. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORIENTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check ORIENTLTD.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs ORIENTLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.BO has a market cap of 605.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while ORIENTLTD.BO trades at ₹63.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas ORIENTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -30.43. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORIENTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check ORIENTLTD.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs BALKRISHNA.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.BO has a market cap of 596.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while BALKRISHNA.BO trades at ₹18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BALKRISHNA.BO's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BALKRISHNA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check BALKRISHNA.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs BALKRISHNA.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.NS has a market cap of 590.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while BALKRISHNA.NS trades at ₹18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas BALKRISHNA.NS's P/E ratio is -9.70. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BALKRISHNA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check BALKRISHNA.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs PERFEPA.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, PERFEPA.BO has a market cap of 512.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while PERFEPA.BO trades at ₹74.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas PERFEPA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PERFEPA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to PERFEPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check PERFEPA.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs DKEGL.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, DKEGL.NS has a market cap of 502.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while DKEGL.NS trades at ₹68.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas DKEGL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DKEGL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to DKEGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check DKEGL.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs GUJCRAFT.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, GUJCRAFT.BO has a market cap of 487.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while GUJCRAFT.BO trades at ₹99.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas GUJCRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GUJCRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to GUJCRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check GUJCRAFT.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs JUMBO.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, JUMBO.BO has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while JUMBO.BO trades at ₹58.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas JUMBO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUMBO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to JUMBO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check JUMBO.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs SIEL.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SIEL.BO has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while SIEL.BO trades at ₹32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas SIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIEL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to SIEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check SIEL.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs KSHITIJPOL.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, KSHITIJPOL.NS has a market cap of 421.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while KSHITIJPOL.NS trades at ₹4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas KSHITIJPOL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check KSHITIJPOL.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs SPL.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SPL.BO has a market cap of 418.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while SPL.BO trades at ₹22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas SPL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to SPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check SPL.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs UMA.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, UMA.NS has a market cap of 399.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while UMA.NS trades at ₹19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas UMA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UMA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to UMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check UMA.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs PEARLPOLY.NS Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.NS has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while PEARLPOLY.NS trades at ₹19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas PEARLPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEARLPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check PEARLPOLY.NS's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs PEARLPOLY.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.BO has a market cap of 318.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while PEARLPOLY.BO trades at ₹19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas PEARLPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PEARLPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check PEARLPOLY.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs INNOVTEC.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, INNOVTEC.BO has a market cap of 317.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while INNOVTEC.BO trades at ₹13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas INNOVTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INNOVTEC.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to INNOVTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check INNOVTEC.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs POLYSPIN.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, POLYSPIN.BO has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while POLYSPIN.BO trades at ₹29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas POLYSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POLYSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to POLYSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check POLYSPIN.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs RISHITECH.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, RISHITECH.BO has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while RISHITECH.BO trades at ₹39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas RISHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RISHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is less volatile compared to RISHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check RISHITECH.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs RCAN.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, RCAN.BO has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while RCAN.BO trades at ₹17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas RCAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to RCAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check RCAN.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs ANUROOP.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, ANUROOP.BO has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while ANUROOP.BO trades at ₹14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas ANUROOP.BO's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANUROOP.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is less volatile compared to ANUROOP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check ANUROOP.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs TRANSFRE.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, TRANSFRE.BO has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while TRANSFRE.BO trades at ₹22.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas TRANSFRE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRANSFRE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to TRANSFRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check TRANSFRE.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs TIRTPLS.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, TIRTPLS.BO has a market cap of 150.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while TIRTPLS.BO trades at ₹35.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas TIRTPLS.BO's P/E ratio is 65.08. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIRTPLS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to TIRTPLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check TIRTPLS.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs RAJPACK.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, RAJPACK.BO has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while RAJPACK.BO trades at ₹30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas RAJPACK.BO's P/E ratio is -1540.00. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RAJPACK.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to RAJPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check RAJPACK.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs ARROWHEAD.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, ARROWHEAD.BO has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while ARROWHEAD.BO trades at ₹75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas ARROWHEAD.BO's P/E ratio is -34.56. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARROWHEAD.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to ARROWHEAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check ARROWHEAD.BO's competition here
UFLEX.NS vs GKP.BO Comparison June 2026
UFLEX.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFLEX.NS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, GKP.BO has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFLEX.NS is priced at ₹440.65, while GKP.BO trades at ₹6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFLEX.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.56, whereas GKP.BO's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, UFLEX.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GKP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFLEX.NS is more volatile compared to GKP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFLEX.NS.Check GKP.BO's competition here