Worth Peripherals Limited
Worth Peripherals Limited (WORTH.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WORTH.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WORTH.NS | ₹159.00 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 16.24 | ₹9.79 | +0.63% |
| TIMETECHNO.NS | ₹192.67 | +0.00% | 96.9B | 20.13 | ₹9.75 | +0.64% |
| TIMETECHNO.BO | ₹192.35 | +0.00% | 96.9B | 20.13 | ₹9.75 | +0.64% |
| EPL.NS | ₹214.90 | +0.00% | 68.1B | 17.02 | ₹12.50 | +2.35% |
| EPL.BO | ₹214.75 | +0.00% | 68.1B | 17.03 | ₹12.49 | +2.35% |
| BORORENEW.NS | ₹478.30 | +0.00% | 67.2B | -106.05 | -₹4.52 | N/A |
| BORORENEW.BO | ₹477.95 | +0.00% | 67.1B | -105.95 | -₹4.52 | N/A |
| AGI.BO | ₹576.15 | -0.00% | 37.1B | 11.15 | ₹51.43 | N/A |
| AGI.NS | ₹575.70 | +0.00% | 37.1B | 11.14 | ₹51.45 | N/A |
| UFLEX.BO | ₹457.55 | +0.00% | 33B | 8.46 | ₹54.04 | +0.66% |
Stock Comparison
WORTH.NS vs TIMETECHNO.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.NS has a market cap of 96.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TIMETECHNO.NS trades at ₹192.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TIMETECHNO.NS's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIMETECHNO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TIMETECHNO.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs TIMETECHNO.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.BO has a market cap of 96.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TIMETECHNO.BO trades at ₹192.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TIMETECHNO.BO's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIMETECHNO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TIMETECHNO.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs EPL.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EPL.NS has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while EPL.NS trades at ₹214.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas EPL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to EPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check EPL.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs EPL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EPL.BO has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while EPL.BO trades at ₹214.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas EPL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to EPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check EPL.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs BORORENEW.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BORORENEW.NS has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BORORENEW.NS trades at ₹478.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BORORENEW.NS's P/E ratio is -106.05. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BORORENEW.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to BORORENEW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BORORENEW.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs BORORENEW.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BORORENEW.BO has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BORORENEW.BO trades at ₹477.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BORORENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -105.95. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BORORENEW.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to BORORENEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BORORENEW.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs AGI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGI.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AGI.BO trades at ₹576.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AGI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to AGI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AGI.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs AGI.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGI.NS has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AGI.NS trades at ₹575.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AGI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to AGI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AGI.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs UFLEX.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UFLEX.BO has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while UFLEX.BO trades at ₹457.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas UFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to UFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check UFLEX.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs UFLEX.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UFLEX.NS has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while UFLEX.NS trades at ₹456.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas UFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to UFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check UFLEX.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs MAXVIL.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MAXVIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while MAXVIL.NS trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas MAXVIL.NS's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAXVIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to MAXVIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check MAXVIL.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs TCPLPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TCPLPACK.BO trades at ₹2,855.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TCPLPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCPLPACK.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TCPLPACK.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs TCPLPACK.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TCPLPACK.NS trades at ₹2,874.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TCPLPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCPLPACK.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to TCPLPACK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TCPLPACK.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs MOLDTKPAC.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while MOLDTKPAC.NS trades at ₹557.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas MOLDTKPAC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check MOLDTKPAC.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs MOLDTKPAC.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.BO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while MOLDTKPAC.BO trades at ₹556.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas MOLDTKPAC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check MOLDTKPAC.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs COSMOFIRST.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.NS has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while COSMOFIRST.NS trades at ₹695.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas COSMOFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COSMOFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check COSMOFIRST.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs COSMOFIRST.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.BO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while COSMOFIRST.BO trades at ₹694.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas COSMOFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COSMOFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check COSMOFIRST.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs HUHTAMAKI.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HUHTAMAKI.NS trades at ₹183.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HUHTAMAKI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HUHTAMAKI.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs HUHTAMAKI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HUHTAMAKI.BO trades at ₹183.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HUHTAMAKI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HUHTAMAKI.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs ORICONENT.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ORICONENT.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ORICONENT.NS trades at ₹66.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ORICONENT.NS's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORICONENT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ORICONENT.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs ORICONENT.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ORICONENT.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ORICONENT.BO trades at ₹66.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ORICONENT.BO's P/E ratio is 38.16. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORICONENT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ORICONENT.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs BOROSCI.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BOROSCI.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BOROSCI.NS trades at ₹112.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BOROSCI.NS's P/E ratio is 62.33. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOROSCI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to BOROSCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BOROSCI.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs COMSYN.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, COMSYN.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while COMSYN.NS trades at ₹189.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas COMSYN.NS's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COMSYN.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to COMSYN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check COMSYN.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs COMSYN.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, COMSYN.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while COMSYN.BO trades at ₹189.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas COMSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COMSYN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to COMSYN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check COMSYN.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs SHREERAMA.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SHREERAMA.BO trades at ₹57.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SHREERAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHREERAMA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SHREERAMA.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs SHREERAMA.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SHREERAMA.NS trades at ₹57.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SHREERAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHREERAMA.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SHREERAMA.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs ARROWGREEN.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ARROWGREEN.BO trades at ₹432.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ARROWGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ARROWGREEN.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs ARROWGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ARROWGREEN.NS trades at ₹432.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ARROWGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARROWGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ARROWGREEN.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs NAHARPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while NAHARPOLY.BO trades at ₹240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas NAHARPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAHARPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check NAHARPOLY.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs NAHARPOLY.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while NAHARPOLY.NS trades at ₹239.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas NAHARPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAHARPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check NAHARPOLY.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs PYRAMID.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PYRAMID.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PYRAMID.NS trades at ₹151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PYRAMID.NS's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PYRAMID.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PYRAMID.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs PYRAMID.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PYRAMID.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PYRAMID.BO trades at ₹151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PYRAMID.BO's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PYRAMID.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PYRAMID.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs TPLPLASTEH.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TPLPLASTEH.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TPLPLASTEH.NS trades at ₹70.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TPLPLASTEH.NS's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TPLPLASTEH.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs HALDYNGL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HALDYNGL.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HALDYNGL.BO trades at ₹92.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HALDYNGL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HALDYNGL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HALDYNGL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HALDYNGL.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs KANPRPLA.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while KANPRPLA.BO trades at ₹200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas KANPRPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KANPRPLA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check KANPRPLA.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs KANPRPLA.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while KANPRPLA.NS trades at ₹197.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas KANPRPLA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KANPRPLA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check KANPRPLA.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs BBTCL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BBTCL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BBTCL.BO trades at ₹190.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BBTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBTCL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to BBTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BBTCL.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs BBTCL.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BBTCL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BBTCL.NS trades at ₹183.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BBTCL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBTCL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to BBTCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BBTCL.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs KALYANI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KALYANI.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while KALYANI.BO trades at ₹490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas KALYANI.BO's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KALYANI.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check KALYANI.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs RDBRL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RDBRL.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while RDBRL.BO trades at ₹160.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas RDBRL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDBRL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to RDBRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check RDBRL.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs SAH.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SAH.BO trades at ₹106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SAH.BO's P/E ratio is 368.79. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAH.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to SAH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SAH.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs PGFOILQ.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PGFOILQ.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PGFOILQ.BO trades at ₹229.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PGFOILQ.BO's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGFOILQ.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to PGFOILQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PGFOILQ.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs SAH.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAH.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SAH.NS trades at ₹104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SAH.NS's P/E ratio is 361.21. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SAH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SAH.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs BALAJEE.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BALAJEE.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BALAJEE.NS trades at ₹33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BALAJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BALAJEE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to BALAJEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BALAJEE.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs HITECHCORP.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HITECHCORP.NS trades at ₹151.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HITECHCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HITECHCORP.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HITECHCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HITECHCORP.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs HITECHCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HITECHCORP.BO trades at ₹151.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HITECHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 35.68. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HITECHCORP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HITECHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HITECHCORP.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs WORTHPERI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while WORTHPERI.BO trades at ₹140.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas WORTHPERI.BO's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORTHPERI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check WORTHPERI.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs WORTHPERI.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while WORTHPERI.NS trades at ₹137.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas WORTHPERI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORTHPERI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to WORTHPERI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check WORTHPERI.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs HPBL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HPBL.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HPBL.BO trades at ₹177.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HPBL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPBL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HPBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HPBL.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs AERONEU.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AERONEU.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AERONEU.BO trades at ₹70.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AERONEU.BO's P/E ratio is 92.30. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AERONEU.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to AERONEU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AERONEU.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs AERONEU.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AERONEU.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AERONEU.NS trades at ₹69.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AERONEU.NS's P/E ratio is 92.16. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AERONEU.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to AERONEU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AERONEU.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs EMMBI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EMMBI.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while EMMBI.BO trades at ₹92.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas EMMBI.BO's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMMBI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to EMMBI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check EMMBI.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs EMMBI.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EMMBI.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while EMMBI.NS trades at ₹91.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas EMMBI.NS's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMMBI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to EMMBI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check EMMBI.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs ECOPLAST.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ECOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ECOPLAST.BO trades at ₹465.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ECOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ECOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ECOPLAST.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs EASTINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EASTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while EASTINDIA.BO trades at ₹102.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas EASTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EASTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to EASTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check EASTINDIA.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs BI.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BI.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BI.BO trades at ₹64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BI.BO's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to BI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BI.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs WORTH.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WORTH.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while WORTH.BO trades at ₹3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas WORTH.BO's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WORTH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to WORTH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check WORTH.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs HINDTIN.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HINDTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HINDTIN.BO trades at ₹122.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HINDTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HINDTIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to HINDTIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HINDTIN.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs KAIRA.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KAIRA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while KAIRA.BO trades at ₹1,459.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas KAIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KAIRA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to KAIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check KAIRA.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs RPPL.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RPPL.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while RPPL.NS trades at ₹16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas RPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPPL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to RPPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check RPPL.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs CAPRIHANS.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CAPRIHANS.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while CAPRIHANS.BO trades at ₹84.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas CAPRIHANS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAPRIHANS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to CAPRIHANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check CAPRIHANS.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs BISIL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BISIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BISIL.BO trades at ₹2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BISIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BISIL.BO's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to BISIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BISIL.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs SHETR.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHETR.BO has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SHETR.BO trades at ₹111.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SHETR.BO's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHETR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to SHETR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SHETR.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs CLARA.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CLARA.BO has a market cap of 975.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while CLARA.BO trades at ₹38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas CLARA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLARA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to CLARA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check CLARA.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs GUJCONT.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GUJCONT.BO has a market cap of 957.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while GUJCONT.BO trades at ₹169.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas GUJCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJCONT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to GUJCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check GUJCONT.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs TOKYOPLAST.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 885.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TOKYOPLAST.BO trades at ₹91.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TOKYOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 83.92. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TOKYOPLAST.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs TOKYOPLAST.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.NS has a market cap of 856.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TOKYOPLAST.NS trades at ₹91.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TOKYOPLAST.NS's P/E ratio is 81.23. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TOKYOPLAST.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs BAPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BAPACK.BO has a market cap of 849M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BAPACK.BO trades at ₹170.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BAPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAPACK.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to BAPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BAPACK.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs AMDIND.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMDIND.NS has a market cap of 826.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AMDIND.NS trades at ₹42.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AMDIND.NS's P/E ratio is -26.78. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMDIND.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to AMDIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AMDIND.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs AMDIND.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMDIND.BO has a market cap of 805.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AMDIND.BO trades at ₹41.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AMDIND.BO's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMDIND.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to AMDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AMDIND.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs SHALIWIR.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SHALIWIR.BO has a market cap of 795.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SHALIWIR.BO trades at ₹19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SHALIWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHALIWIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SHALIWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SHALIWIR.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs HINDNATGLS.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HINDNATGLS.NS has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while HINDNATGLS.NS trades at ₹8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas HINDNATGLS.NS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HINDNATGLS.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to HINDNATGLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check HINDNATGLS.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs ORIENTLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.NS has a market cap of 602.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ORIENTLTD.NS trades at ₹60.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ORIENTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ORIENTLTD.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs ORIENTLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.BO has a market cap of 601.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ORIENTLTD.BO trades at ₹60.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ORIENTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -21.24. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ORIENTLTD.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs PERFEPA.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PERFEPA.BO has a market cap of 550.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PERFEPA.BO trades at ₹82.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PERFEPA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PERFEPA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to PERFEPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PERFEPA.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs BALKRISHNA.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.NS has a market cap of 541M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BALKRISHNA.NS trades at ₹16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BALKRISHNA.NS's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BALKRISHNA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BALKRISHNA.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs BALKRISHNA.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.BO has a market cap of 529.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while BALKRISHNA.BO trades at ₹16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas BALKRISHNA.BO's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BALKRISHNA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check BALKRISHNA.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs SPL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SPL.BO has a market cap of 515.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SPL.BO trades at ₹25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SPL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SPL.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs GUJCRAFT.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GUJCRAFT.BO has a market cap of 513M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while GUJCRAFT.BO trades at ₹105.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas GUJCRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJCRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to GUJCRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check GUJCRAFT.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs SIEL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SIEL.BO has a market cap of 494.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while SIEL.BO trades at ₹35.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas SIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to SIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check SIEL.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs JUMBO.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, JUMBO.BO has a market cap of 486.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while JUMBO.BO trades at ₹61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas JUMBO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JUMBO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to JUMBO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check JUMBO.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs INNOVTEC.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, INNOVTEC.BO has a market cap of 415.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while INNOVTEC.BO trades at ₹18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas INNOVTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INNOVTEC.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to INNOVTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check INNOVTEC.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs PEARLPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.BO has a market cap of 327.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PEARLPOLY.BO trades at ₹19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PEARLPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEARLPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PEARLPOLY.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs PEARLPOLY.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.NS has a market cap of 326.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while PEARLPOLY.NS trades at ₹19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas PEARLPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEARLPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check PEARLPOLY.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs RISHITECH.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RISHITECH.BO has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while RISHITECH.BO trades at ₹42.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas RISHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RISHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to RISHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check RISHITECH.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs POLYSPIN.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, POLYSPIN.BO has a market cap of 303.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while POLYSPIN.BO trades at ₹34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas POLYSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POLYSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to POLYSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check POLYSPIN.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs RCAN.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RCAN.BO has a market cap of 269.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while RCAN.BO trades at ₹27.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas RCAN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to RCAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check RCAN.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs KSHITIJPOL.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KSHITIJPOL.NS has a market cap of 235M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while KSHITIJPOL.NS trades at ₹2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas KSHITIJPOL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check KSHITIJPOL.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs JAUSPOL.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, JAUSPOL.BO has a market cap of 158.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while JAUSPOL.BO trades at ₹33.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas JAUSPOL.BO's P/E ratio is 311.91. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JAUSPOL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to JAUSPOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check JAUSPOL.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs TRANSFRE.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRANSFRE.BO has a market cap of 156.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TRANSFRE.BO trades at ₹22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TRANSFRE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRANSFRE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSFRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TRANSFRE.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs ANUROOP.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ANUROOP.BO has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ANUROOP.BO trades at ₹12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ANUROOP.BO's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANUROOP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to ANUROOP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ANUROOP.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs RAJPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RAJPACK.BO has a market cap of 145.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while RAJPACK.BO trades at ₹31.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas RAJPACK.BO's P/E ratio is -42.44. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAJPACK.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to RAJPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check RAJPACK.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs ANTGRAPHIC.NS Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ANTGRAPHIC.NS has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ANTGRAPHIC.NS trades at ₹0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ANTGRAPHIC.NS's P/E ratio is -29.67. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ANTGRAPHIC.NS's competition here
WORTH.NS vs GKP.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GKP.BO has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while GKP.BO trades at ₹6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas GKP.BO's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GKP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to GKP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check GKP.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs ARROWHEAD.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ARROWHEAD.BO has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while ARROWHEAD.BO trades at ₹70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas ARROWHEAD.BO's P/E ratio is -32.26. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARROWHEAD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to ARROWHEAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check ARROWHEAD.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs TIRTPLS.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIRTPLS.BO has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while TIRTPLS.BO trades at ₹26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas TIRTPLS.BO's P/E ratio is 50.44. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIRTPLS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is more volatile compared to TIRTPLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check TIRTPLS.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs YASHRAJC.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, YASHRAJC.BO has a market cap of 94.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while YASHRAJC.BO trades at ₹5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas YASHRAJC.BO's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YASHRAJC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to YASHRAJC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check YASHRAJC.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs AADIIND.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AADIIND.BO has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while AADIIND.BO trades at ₹8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas AADIIND.BO's P/E ratio is -42.33. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AADIIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to AADIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check AADIIND.BO's competition here
WORTH.NS vs STANPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
WORTH.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WORTH.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, STANPACK.BO has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WORTH.NS is priced at ₹159.00, while STANPACK.BO trades at ₹11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WORTH.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.24, whereas STANPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 73.75. In terms of profitability, WORTH.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STANPACK.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WORTH.NS is less volatile compared to STANPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WORTH.NS.Check STANPACK.BO's competition here