Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 111.78B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while MMC trades at $226.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 86.59B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while AJG trades at $338.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 52.10. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 76.48B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while AON trades at $354.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 31.90B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while BRO trades at $111.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 30.64B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while WTW trades at $309.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is -671.89. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WTW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 16.31B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while ERIE trades at $353.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 5.78B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while CRVL trades at $112.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 66.57. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while BWIN trades at $38.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -73.25. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while BRP trades at $32.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, SBIGY has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while SBIGY trades at $5.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SBIGY's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SBIGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to SBIGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 548.28M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while SLQT trades at $3.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -39.81. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SLQT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 515.29M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while CRD-A trades at $10.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 513.60M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while CRD-B trades at $10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 480.51M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while TWFG trades at $32.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 179.11. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 194.40M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while GOCO trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GOCO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 155.27M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while EHTH trades at $5.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 86.76M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while FANH trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 34.99M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while ZBAO trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 14.55M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while TIRX trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, MAAL has a market cap of 10.17M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while MAAL trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas MAAL's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MAAL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to MAAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while RELIW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -3.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is more volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 3.18M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while RELI trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RELI's ROE of -3.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 1.13M. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while HUIZ trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.

WLTW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WLTW stands at 24.68B. In comparison, ARGQ has a market cap of 41369.00. Regarding current trading prices, WLTW is priced at $231.56, while ARGQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WLTW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ARGQ's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, WLTW's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARGQ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLTW is less volatile compared to ARGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLTW.